SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Instruction On Students’ English Achievement and Attitude

Öz-düzenleme Stratejileri Öğretiminin Öğrencilerin İngilizce Başarılarına ve Tutumlarına Etkisi

Aslıhan KUYUMCU VARDAR
Zeki ARSAL
Pages
32–52
Publication Date
2014-10-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

No significant difference was found in the points of English Attitude Scale between control and sample groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to investigate the effects of English instruction including self-regulated learning strategies on students’ English achievement and attitude towards lesson.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The instruction included the first classes of Furniture and Decoration (23) and Electrical Education (24) departments of Düzce University, Faculty of Technical Education, in 2008–2009 Academic year.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:No significant difference was found in the points of English Attitude Scale between control and sample groups.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2008–2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Öz-Düzenleme Stratejileri · İngilizce Öğretimi · İngilizce Akademik Başarı

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the effects of English instruction including self-regulated learning strategies on students’ English achievement and attitude towards lesson. Pre-test-post-test control group design of experimental method was used in the study. The dependent variables consist of English achievement and attitude towards English. The independent variable of which effects on dependent variables investigated is the English instruction prepared by the researcher based on self-regulated learning. The instruction included the first classes of Furniture and Decoration (23) and Electrical Education (24) departments of Düzce University, Faculty of Technical Education, in 2008–2009 Academic year. Three data collection instruments were used in the study. These were; the Achievement Test, Readiness Test which were prepared by the researcher and English Attitude Scale. The following findings were obtained after eight weeks of English instruction which was integrated with self-regulated learning strategies: English achievement of the sample group increased significantly depending on the instruction integrated with self-regulated learning strategies. No significant difference was found in the points of English Attitude Scale between control and sample groups.

Özet

Bu çalışmada öz-düzenleme stratejilerine göre düzenlenen İngilizce dersinin öğrencilerin başarılarına ve tutumlarına etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırmada deneysel yöntemin öntest-sontest kontrol gruplu deseni kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin İngilizce dersindeki başarıları ve İngilizce dersine yönelik tutumları araştırmanın bağımlı değişkenlerini oluşturmaktadır. Bu bağımlı değişkenler üzerindeki etkisi araştırılan bağımsız değişken ise araştırmacı tarafından öz-düzenleme stratejileri temel alınarak hazırlanan etkinliklerdir. Uygulama, 2008–2009 öğretim yılı, bahar yarıyılında, Düzce Üniversitesi, Teknik Eğitim Fakültesi Mobilya ve Dekorasyon (23) ve Elektrik Eğitimi (24) bölümlerinin 1. Sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışmada, üç veri toplama aracı kullanılmıştır. Bu araçlar “İngilizce Hazırbulunuşluk Testi, İngilizce Başarı Testi ve İngilizce Tutum Ölçeği”dir. Öz-düzenleme stratejilerine göre düzenlenmiş ve sekiz hafta süren İngilizce dersi sonunda şu bulgulara ulaşılmıştır: Uygulama sonrasında İngilizce öğretiminde öz-düzenleme stratejileri kullanımına bağlı olarak öğrenci başarısının anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu görülmüştür. Buna karşılık deney ve kontrol grupları arasında İngilizceye yönelik tutum puanlarında anlamlı bir farklılık bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

VARDAR, A. K., ARSAL, Z. (2014). The Effect of Self-Regulated Learning Strategies Instruction On Students’ English Achievement and Attitude. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 32–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/457532

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Arends, R. I. (1997). Classroom instruction and management. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Arsal, Z. (2010). The effects of diaries on self-regulation strategies of preservice science teachers. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 5(1), 85-103.
  2. Baharom S. (2003). Describing pre-university students’ learning strategies using the rasch Model Proceeding of NZARE AARE Conference Educational Research, Risks, & Dilemmas (29 November – 3 December, Auckland), New Zealand. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak, E.K, Akgün, Ö.E, Karadeniz, Ş. ve Demirel, F. (2010). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara:
  3. Pegem Akademi. Büyüköztürk, Ş (1998). Kovaryans analizi: varyans analizi ile karşılaştırmalı bir inceleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 31 (1)(91-105).
  4. Camahalan F. M. G. (2006). Effects of self-regulated learning on mathematics achievement of selected Southeast Asian Children. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(3), 194-205.
  5. Chen, C.S. (2002). Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information systems course, Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, Vol. 20, No. 1, Spring. Cheng, E. C. K. (2011). The role of self-regulated learning in enhancing learning performance. The International Journal of Research and Review, 6(1), 1-16.
  6. Chuan, W. (2004). Self-regulated learning strategies and self-efficacy beliefs of children learning english as a second language. The Ohio State University, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Columbus, Ohio. Çubukçu, F. (2008). Enhancing vocabulary development and reading comprehension through metacognitive strategies. Issues in Educational Research, 18(1), 1-11.
  7. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner. Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. UK: Psychology Pres, Taylor and Francis Group. Drmrod, J.E. 1990). Human learning. Macmillan P. Company. New York. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34 (10), 906-911.
  8. Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A. C. ( ed. ) (1998). Metacognition in Eductional Theory and Practice. Mahwah, NJ. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
  9. Hofer, B. K., Yu, S. L., & Pintrich, P. R. (1998). Teaching college students to be self-regulated learners. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 57- 85). New York: The Guilford Press. J