Journals / Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2

Sociological Discussions on Gender-Specific Medicine

James W. Messerschmidt / Hegemonik Erkeklik: Formülasyon, Yeniden Formülasyon ve Genişleme

Pages
295–303
Publication Date
2019-11-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

By emphasizing the insufficiency of sociological analysis about GSM, Annandale and Hammarström’s discourse analysis will be discussed GSM and its possible social consequences will be discussed sociologically by taking into consideration “techno-medicine” as a new stage of medicine in which biomedicalization is practiced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Various researches have long revealed gender inequalities in health and discussed the origins of these inequalities based on structural and cultural factors or biological differences.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Today, some of the most important indicators of the difference in the health status between men and women are the longer life expectancy of women and the higher morbidity rates of women compared to men, and certain tendencies in diseases of each gender.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:By emphasizing the insufficiency of sociological analysis about GSM, Annandale and Hammarström’s discourse analysis will be discussed GSM and its possible social consequences will be discussed sociologically by taking into consideration “techno-medicine” as a new stage of medicine in which biomedicalization is practiced.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:hegemonik erkeklik · hegemonik olmayan erkeklikler · toplumsal cinsiyet

Abstract

Various researches have long revealed gender inequalities in health and discussed the origins of these inequalities based on structural and cultural factors or biological differences. Today, some of the most important indicators of the difference in the health status between men and women are the longer life expectancy of women and the higher morbidity rates of women compared to men, and certain tendencies in diseases of each gender. Based on these differences, gender-specific medicine (GSM) emerged as an extension of personalized medicine, and it began to increase in the early 2000s. This paper discusses what GSM is, how it expands and how it can be reviewed sociologically. By emphasizing the insufficiency of sociological analysis about GSM, Annandale and Hammarström’s discourse analysis will be discussed GSM and its possible social consequences will be discussed sociologically by taking into consideration “techno-medicine” as a new stage of medicine in which biomedicalization is practiced.

Özet

Özgün Adı: Hegemonic Masculinity: Formulation, Reformulation, and Amplification Yazar(lar): James W. Messerschmidt Türkçe Çevirmeni: Eleştirel Erkeklik İncelemeleri İnisiyatifi Türkçe Basım Editörleri: Çimen Günay-Erkol, Nurseli Yeşim Sünbüloğlu Yayınevi: İstanbul: Özyeğin Üniversitesi Yayınları Basım Yılı/Sayfa Sayısı 2019/294 syf. ISBN: 978-605-5625-17-7

🔖

Cite This Article

BARAN, B. H. (2019). Sociological Discussions on Gender-Specific Medicine. Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 2, 295–303. https://ajindex.com/articles/456714

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Atay, T. (2012). Çin işi Japon işi: Cinsiyet ve cinsellik üzerine antropolojik değiniler. İstanbul:
  2. İletişim Yayınları Connell, R. W. (2016). Toplumsal cinsiyet ve iktidar (2. Basım). (Çev. C. Soydemir). İstanbul:
  3. Ayrıntı Yayınları Connell, R. W. (2019). Erkeklikler (Çev. N. Konukcu). Ankara:
  4. Phoenix Connell, R. W. ve Messerschmidt, J. W. (2005). Hegemonic masculinity: Rethinking the concept. Gender & Society, 19(6), 829-859. doi: 10.1177/0891243205278639 Çakmak, S. (2019). Etno-dinsel kimlikler ve ilişkisellik: Mardin örneği (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Aydın Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın Kaufman, M. (1994). Men, feminism, and men's contradictory experiences of power. H. Brod ve M. Kaufman (Ed.). Theorizing masculinities içinde (s. 142-163). London: SAGE Messerschmidt, J. W. (2019). Hegemonik erkeklik: Formülasyon, yeniden formülasyon ve genişleme (Çev. Eleştirel Erkeklik İncelemeleri İnisiyatifi). İstanbul: Özyeğin Üniversitesi Yayınları Özmakas, U. (2019). Mikropolitika ve gündelik direniş. M. Demirtaş (Ed.). Direnişin mikropolitikası içinde (s. 171-187). İstanbul: PİNHAN