Journals / Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Rewriting in the Context of Feminist Literary Criticism: The Case of Lavinia | Feminist Edebiyat Eleştirisi Bağlamında Yeniden Yazım: Lavinia Örneği

Feminist Edebiyat Eleştirisi Bağlamında Yeniden Yazım: Lavinia Örneği | Rewriting in the Context of Feminist Literary Criticism: The Case of Lavinia

Pages
35–62
Publication Date
2021-05-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the frame of all these theoretical approaches, Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia character has been comparatively examined with the character in Verigilius’ Aeneis legend, which is the original text, and the character analysis has been made accordingly.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Storytelling plays an important role for humanity not only in transferring knowledge and experience but also developing the ways of imagination and thinking.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Ancient narratives and fictions dating back to old ages continue to take hold of today’s literature, and therefore, society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the frame of all these theoretical approaches, Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia character has been comparatively examined with the character in Verigilius’ Aeneis legend, which is the original text, and the character analysis has been made accordingly.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:mit eleştirisi · yeniden yazım · kadın edebiyatı

Abstract

Storytelling plays an important role for humanity not only in transferring knowledge and experience but also developing the ways of imagination and thinking. Ancient narratives and fictions dating back to old ages continue to take hold of today’s literature, and therefore, society. This research states that patriarchal ideology has harbored sexual identities in legends and myths throughout history, especially the Western history of thought, and these identities still extend to today’s societies. Consequently, this research focuses on the rewriting of these ancient narratives, legends, and myths, that give societies a sense of common belonging and identity in the context of feminist literary criticism. Within this context, the development of feminist literary criticism through history, myth criticism, and the resulting feminist mythmaking/rewriting thoughts have been studied. In the frame of all these theoretical approaches, Ursula Le Guin’s Lavinia character has been comparatively examined with the character in Verigilius’ Aeneis legend, which is the original text, and the character analysis has been made accordingly.

Özet

Hikâye anlatmak, insanlık için bilgi ve deneyimlerini aktarmanın yanı sıra hayal kurma ve düşünme biçimini geliştirmesi bakımından da önemli bir yere sahiptir. Eski çağlara dayanan anlatı teknikleri ve kurguları günümüz edebiyatını ve dolayısıyla toplumlarını da etkisi altında tutmaya devam etmektedir. Bu araştırma, ataerkil ideolojinin tarih boyunca–özellikle Batı düşünce tarihi- destan ve mitlerde tekrar eden cinsel kimlikleri barındırdığını ve bu kimliklerin de günümüz toplumlarına sirayet ettiğini ileri sürer. Dolayısıyla bu çalışma, en eski anlatı biçimi olan, toplumlara ortak bir aidiyet ve kimlik veren destan ve mitlerin feminist edebiyat eleştirisi bağlamında yeniden yazımına odaklanır. Bu makalede, tarihsel olarak feminist edebiyat eleştirisinin gelişimi, mit eleştirisi ve sonucunda ortaya çıkan feminist mit yaratımı/yeniden yazımı düşünceleri irdelenmiştir. Tüm bu teorik yaklaşımlar çerçevesinde Ursula Le Guin’in Lavinia karakteri orijinal metin olan Vergilius’un Aeneis destanındaki aynı adlı karakteri ile karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenerek karakter analizi yapılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ULU, A. (2021). Rewriting in the Context of Feminist Literary Criticism: The Case of Lavinia | Feminist Edebiyat Eleştirisi Bağlamında Yeniden Yazım: Lavinia Örneği. Akdeniz Kadın Çalışmaları ve Toplumsal Cinsiyet Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 35–62. https://ajindex.com/articles/456655

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (23)

  1. Kaynakça Assmann, A. (2008). Canon and Archive. A. E. Nünning içinde, Cultural Memory Studies: An International and Interdisciplinary Handbook, 97-107.
  2. Bal, M. (1999). Acts of Memory: Cultural Recall in the Present. (M. Bal, Dü.) Hanover: University Press of New England. Beauvoir, S. D. (1993). İkinci Cins. (B. Onaran, Çev.) İstanbul:
  3. Payel Yayınları.
  4. Brooks, V. W. (1918). On Creating a Usable Past. The Dial: A Semi-monthly Journal of Literary Criticism, 64, 41-337.
  5. Carol Schreier Rupprecht, E. L. (1985). Feminist Archetypal Theory: A Proposal. Knoxville: University Tennessee Press.
  6. Dörschel, F. B. (2012).
  7. Ancient Texts, Contemporary Voices: Rewritings Of Greek And Biblical Myths By Women Writers. Lambert Academic Publishing. Daly, M. (1978). Gyn/ Ecology. Boston: Beacon Press.
  8. Donovan, J. (1975). Feminist Litarary Criticism. Kentucky: University Press of Kentucky. DuPlesis, R. B. (1985). Writing Beyond the Ending: Narrative Strategies of Twentieth Century Women Writiers. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
  9. Eagleton, T. (2017). Edebiyat Kuramı. İstanbul:
  10. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  11. Hite, M. (1992). The Other Side of the Story: Structures and Strategies of Contemporary Feminist Narratives. New York: Cornell University Press.
  12. Humm, M. (2002). Feminist Edebiyat Eleştirisi. (G. Bakay, Çev.) İstanbul:
  13. Say Yayınları.
  14. Irigaray, L. (1977).
  15. Woman's Exile, Ideology and Consciousness. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
  16. Irigaray, L. (1993). Toward a Culture of Difference. (A. Martin, Çev.) London: Routledge. Larrington, C. (1992). The Feminist Companion to Mythology. London: Pandora. Lauter, E. (1984). Women as Mythmakers: Poetry and Visual Art by Twentieth Century. Bloomington: University of Indiana Press.
  17. Le Guin, U. K. (2014). Lavinia. (G. Koca, Çev.) İstanbul:
  18. Metis. Lyotard, J. F. (1991). Rewriting Modernity içinde,. The Inhuman: Reflections of Time, s. 24-35.
  19. Millet, K. (1987). Cİnsel Politika. İstanbul:
  20. Payel Yayınları.
  21. Moraru, C. (2001). Rewriting: Postmodern Narrative and Cultural Critique in the Age of Cloning. Albany: SUNY Press.
  22. Ostriker, A. (1985). The Thieves of Language: Women Poets and Revisionist Mythmaking. E. Showalter içinde, The New Feminist Criticism (s. 314-339). New York: Pantheon. Plate, L. (2011). Transforming Memoriesin in Contemporary Women’s Rewriting. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. Pratt, A. (1978). Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers: Notes Toward a Preliterary History of Women’s Archetypes. Feminist Studies, 4, 163-194.
  23. Pratt, A. (1982). Archetypal Patter