Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 61

Glocal Culture in the Second Language Setting on a Glocal, Cosmopolitan Campus

Pages
539–552
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The purpose of this qualitative study is to dwell on glocal culture witnessed in second language settings on a glocal, cosmopolitan higher education campus.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Culture is the heritage handed down from generation to generation from the time people of the world started to live in communities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present outlook of culture is, in fact, the representation of a long historical process the world nations have experienced within their own states and through various interactions with other nations and cultures up till now.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The purpose of this qualitative study is to dwell on glocal culture witnessed in second language settings on a glocal, cosmopolitan higher education campus.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Culture is the heritage handed down from generation to generation from the time people of the world started to live in communities. The present outlook of culture is, in fact, the representation of a long historical process the world nations have experienced within their own states and through various interactions with other nations and cultures up till now. In today’s global world, local culture, national culture and cultural differences are approached as a whole making the global culture. Peoples of the world, today, are more familiar than ever with the aspects of other cultures thanks to the developments in a number of areas like international tourism, trade, education, and so on. The purpose of this qualitative study is to dwell on glocal culture witnessed in second language settings on a glocal, cosmopolitan higher education campus.

Özet

Dünyada insanların bir arada yaşamaya başlamasından beri, kültür nesilden nesile aktarılan bir miras olmuştur. Kültürün günümüzdeki durumu, aslında, dünya milletlerinin kendi ülke vatandaşları ve diğer milliyetlerle ve kültürlerle olan uzun tarihî ilişkileri ile şekillenmiştir. Günümüz küresel dünyasında; yerel kültür, millî kültür ve kültürel farklılıklar küresel kültürü oluşturan bir bütün olarak değerlendirilmektedir. Bugün, dünya milletleri uluslararası turizm, ticaret, eğitim gibi birçok alandaki gelişmeler sayesinde farklı kültürlere şimdiye kadar olduğundan daha aşina olmuştur. Bu nitel çalışmanın amacı, küyerel uluslararası bir kampüste ikinci dil öğrenme ortamında karşılaşılan küyerel kültür üzerine bir bakış açısı sunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TULGAR, A. T. (2022). Glocal Culture in the Second Language Setting on a Glocal, Cosmopolitan Campus. Atatürk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 61, 539–552. https://ajindex.com/articles/455289

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Tizon, Al. (2009). “The Glocalization of Mission as Transformation: How the Global and the Local have shaped a Movement”. Transformation,26(4), 247-257. DOI: 10.1177/0265378809342355. ISSN 0265-3788.
  2. Susa, Oleg. (2011). The Culture of global citizenship and global media. In Barrie Axford and Richard Huggins (Eds.), Cultures and/of Globalization (pp. 54-63). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. Roudometof, Victor. (2005). “Transnationalism, Cosmopolitanism and Glocalization”. Current Sociology, 53(1), 113-135. DOI: 10.1177/0011392105048291. Roudometof, Victor. (2014). “Nationalism, Globalization and Glocalization”. Thesis Eleven, 122(1), 18-33. DOI: 10.1177/0725513614535700. Robertson, Roland. (1995). “Glocalization: Time-space and Homogeneityheterogeneity”. In M. Featherstone, S. Lash, & R. Robertson (Eds.) (1995). Global modernities (pp. 25-44).
  3. Robertson, Roland. (2012). “Globalisation or Glocalisation?”. The Journal of International Communication, 18(2), 191-208. DOI: 10.1080/13216597.2012. 709925. Ritzer, George. (2003). “Rethinking Globalization: Glocalization/globalization and Something/nothing”. Sociological theory, 21(3), 193-209.
  4. Porta, Donetalle. (2005). “Globalizations and Democracy”. Democratization, 12(5), 668685. DOI: 10.1080/13510340500322140. Pantea, Marius. (2014). “Globalization and Remote Gambling”. Journal of criminal investigations, 1, 7-16.
  5. Palmer, John and Young Ha Cho. (2012). “South Korean Higher Education Internationalization Policies: Perceptions and Experiences”. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13, 387-401. DOI. 10.1007/s12564-012-9204-2.
  6. Mok, Joshua and Michael Lee. (2003). “Globalization or Glocalization? Higher Education Reforms in Singapore”. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 23(1), 1542. DOI: 10.1080/0218879030230103. Melluish, Steve. (2014). “Globalization, Culture and Psychology”. International Review of Psychiatry, 26(5), 538-543.
  7. McGrew, Anthony. (1998). “The Globalisation Debate: Putting the Advanced Capitalist State in its Place”. Global Society, 12(3), 299-321.
  8. Martens, Pim, Axel Dreher and Noel Gaston. (2010). “Globalisation, the Global Village and the Civil Society”. Futures, 42, 574-582.
  9. Martell, Luke. (2007). ‘The Third Wave in Globalization Theory’. International Studies Review, 9(2), 173-196.
  10. Markee, Numa. (2000). “Some Thoughts on Globalization: A Response to Warschauer”. TESOL Quarterly, 34(3), 569-574.
  11. Kraidy, Marwan (1999). “The Global, the Local, and the Hybrid: A Native Ethnography of Gloca