Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi (Y. A. The Eurasian Journal of Medicine) / 1998 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1-2

Quadriceps (Q) angle values in the students of physical education and sports department

Beden eğitimi ve spor bölümü öğrencilerinde quadriceps (Q) açısı değerleri

Pages
19–23
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Measurements were made on totally 196 cases in order to determine Q angle value (which is the clinical criterion of alignment formed anatomically by quadriceps femoris muscle) in supine and standing positions, and to observe how it changes according to the sex, position and knee axis.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mean Q angle in supine position in women were 12.97°, 12.74°; in men 10.59°, 10.75°; and in standing position the Q angle values in women were 13,69°, 13.98°and in men 10.38° and 10° in right and left knee respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05).
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Measurements were made on totally 196 cases in order to determine Q angle value (which is the clinical criterion of alignment formed anatomically by quadriceps femoris muscle) in supine and standing positions, and to observe how it changes according to the sex, position and knee axis. The results are evaluated statistically with student-t test. Mean Q angle in supine position in women were 12.97°, 12.74°; in men 10.59°, 10.75°; and in standing position the Q angle values in women were 13,69°, 13.98°and in men 10.38° and 10° in right and left knee respectively. The Q angle values of women were much higher statistically than those of men in both positions (pO.001), in knees with normal axis were found to be normal in women and higher in man in respect to the values indicated formerly. The Q angles in knees with varus were lower than the normal values. This angle difference between the knees with normal axis and the knees with varus was statistically significant. Q angle in standing position were higher than those of the angles in supine position as 0.95° in women and 0.77° in- men. This difference was not statistically significant (p> 0.05).

Özet

Quadriceps femoris adelesi diz eklemini etkileyen dinamik yapılardan en önemlisidir. Bu adelenin anatomik olarak oluşturduğu dizilimin klinik göstergesi olan Q açısının, yatarak ve ayaktaki pozisyonlardaki değerlerini belirlemek, cinse, pozisyona ve diz aksına göre ne şekilde değiştiğini tesbit etmek amacıyla 75'i bayan 121'i erkek toplam 196 sporcuda ölçüm yapıldı. Alınan sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak student t testi ile değerlendirildi. Tüm olgularda yatarak ölçülen Q açısı değerleri ortalama olarak bayanlarda sağ dizde 12.97°, sol dizde 12.74°; erkeklerde sağ dizde 10.59°; sol dizde 10.75°; ayakta ölçülen Q açısı değerleri ise, bayanlarda sağ dizde 13.69°, sol dizde 13.98°; erkeklerde sağ dizde 10.38°, sol dizde 10° bulunmuştur. Bayanların Q açısı değerlerinin, her iki pozisyonda da erkeklerden istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir şekilde yüksek olduğu belirlenmiştir (p0.05).

🔖

Cite This Article

KARSAN, O., YÜNCEVİZ, R., AYDIN, Ş., DANE, Ş. (2022). Quadriceps (Q) angle values in the students of physical education and sports department. Atatürk Üniversitesi Tıp Dergisi (Y. A. The Eurasian Journal of Medicine), Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1-2, 19–23. https://ajindex.com/articles/455055

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Scuderi GR. Surgical treatment for patellar instability: The patellofemoral joint. Orthop Clin North Am 1992
  2. 630 2. Freeman BL. Recurrent dislocation. In: Crenshaw AH (ed). Campbell's Operative Orthopaedics. Seventh ed St. Louis: CV Mosby Company, 1987: 2173-2184 3. Huberti HH, Hayes WC. Patellafemoral contact pressures: The influence of q angle and tendofemoral contact. J Bone Joint Surg 1984
  3. A: 715- 724 4. Hvid I, Andersen LI, Schmidt H. Chondromalacia patella: The relation to patellofemoral joint mechanics. Acta Orthop Scand 1981
  4. 666 5. Insall J, Falvo KA, Wise DW. Condromalacia patella: A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg 1976
  5. A: 1-8 6. Kettelkamp DB. Current concepts review: Management of patellar malalignment. J Bone Joint Surg 1981
  6. A: 1344-1347 7. Taskiran E, Bat E, Lok V. Sporcular ye normal bireylerde quadriseps femoris agisi. Spor Hek Der 1997
  7. 81 8. Aydin AT. Patellofemoral eklem hastaliklan (Semptomatoloji, klinik tans ve ayinci tans). Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1995
  8. 375 9. Hvid I, Andersen LI. The quadriceps angle and its relation to femoral torsion. Acta Orthop Scand 1982
  9. 579 10. Cox JS. An evaluation of the Elmslie-Trillat procedure for management of patellar dislocation and subluxations: A preliminary report. Am J Sports Med 1976
  10. 77 11. Kernozek TW, Greer NL. Quadriceps angle and rearfoot motion: relationships in walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993
  11. 410 12. Insall J, Bullough PG, Burstein AH. Proximal "Tube" realignment of the patella for chondromalacia patella. Clin Orthop 1979
  12. 69 13. Larson RL, Cabaud HE, Slocum DB, James SL, Keenan T, Hutchinson T. The patellar compression syndrome: surgical treatment by lateral retinacular release. Clin Orthop 1978
  13. 167 14. Gar E, Baydar ML. Patellar kondromalazinin artroskopik tans ve tedavisi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1995
  14. 390 15. Imamoglu 0, Kuru 0, Dogan AA, Tutkun E. Beden egittmi ye spor bOlCmC Ogrencilerinde sift Ostu yatis ye ayaktaki pozisyona gore quadriceps asisi de§erleri, Karadeniz Tip Der 1995
  15. 130 16. Olcay E, cetinus E, Men M, Kara AN. Gang erkek ve bayanlarda ayakta ye yatar pozisyonlarda quadriceps agisinin mukayesesi ye degerlendirilmesi. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 1994
  16. 27 17. D'Amico JC, Rubin M. The influence of foot orthoses on the quadriseps angle. J Am Pediat Med Assoc 1986
  17. 340 18. Horton MG, Hall TL. Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationsh