Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Molar diş çekimini takiben ağrı kontrolünde iki lokal anesteziğin etkinliğinin ve güvenilirliğinin karşılaştırılması

Comparison of efficacy and safety of two local anesthetics in the control of pain after molar removal

Pages
22–25
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it can be concluded that both anesthetics solutions showed not only similar effects but also they could be safely used for the control of postoperative pain.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Using local anesthetics to control a patients pain is one of the most important factors for successful dental treatment The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of prilocain (Citanest) with octapressin and articain HCL (Ultracain DS-Forte*) with ephinephrine HCL in the control of pain after molar removal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There were statistically significant differences between prilocain HCL and articain HCL on their ability to control the postoperative pain in only 4th hour.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it can be concluded that both anesthetics solutions showed not only similar effects but also they could be safely used for the control of postoperative pain.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Using local anesthetics to control a patients pain is one of the most important factors for successful dental treatment The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of prilocain (Citanest) with octapressin and articain HCL (Ultracain DS-Forte*) with ephinephrine HCL in the control of pain after molar removal. There were statistically significant differences between prilocain HCL and articain HCL on their ability to control the postoperative pain in only 4th hour. In addition, no serious adverse events related to the articain or prilocain were shown. According to the results, it can be concluded that both anesthetics solutions showed not only similar effects but also they could be safely used for the control of postoperative pain.

Özet

Lokal anestetikler kullanarak hastanın ağrısının kontrol altına alınması, başarılı dental tedavinin en önemli faktörlerinden biridir. Çalışmamızın amacı, octapressin içeren Prilocain (Citanesf) ile epinephrine HCL içeren Articain HCL (Ultracain DS-Forte )ün molar diş çekimi takibinde gelişen ağrının kontrolü üzerine olan etkilerini ve bu iki ajanın güvenilirliğini karşılaştırmaktı.Post-operatif ağrı kontrolleri açısından yalnız 4. saatte istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark gözlendi. Ayrıca, Articain HCL veya Prilocain ile ilgili ciddi bir ters etki gözlenmedi. Bu çalışmanın sonuçlarına dayanarak, postoperatif ağrı kontrolünde her iki anestezik solüsyonun sadece benzer şekilde bir etkiye sahip olmadıklarını aynı zamanda güvenli olarak kullanılabileceklerini de düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYA, Ş. G., BÜYÜKKURT, M. C., DAYI, E. (2022). Molar diş çekimini takiben ağrı kontrolünde iki lokal anesteziğin etkinliğinin ve güvenilirliğinin karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 22–25. https://ajindex.com/articles/452787

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Costa CG, Tortamano IP,Rocha RG, Francischone CE, Tortamano Nicolau. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration. Quintessence Int. 2005 Mar; 36(3): 197-201.
  2. Allman KG, McFadyen JG, Armstrong J, Sturrock GD, Wilson IH. Comparison of articaine and bupivacaine/lidocaine for single medial canthus peribulbar anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2001 Oct; 87(4):584-7.
  3. Uckan S, Güler N, Sümer M, Ungor M. Local anesthetic efficacy for oral surgery: Comparison of diphenhydramine and prilocaine. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1998 Jul; 86(1): 26-30.
  4. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. Efficacy of articaine: A new amid local anesthetic. JADA. 2000:131; 635-642.
  5. Oertel R, Rahn R and Kirch W. Clinical pharmacokinetics of articaine. Clin Pharmacokinet 1997 Dec; 33(6):417-25.
  6. Review. Metaxotos NG, Asplund O, and Hayes M. The efficacy of bupivacaine with adrenaline in reducing pain and bleeding associated with breast reduction: a prospective trial. The British of Plastic Surgery. 1999:52; 290-293.
  7. Jensen OT, Upton LG, Hayward JR, Sweet RB. Advantages of long-acting local anesthesia using etidocaine hydrochloride. J Oral Surg. 1981 May; 39(5):350-3.
  8. Tuffin JR, Cunliffe DR, Begg R, Shaw SR. Does bupivacaine irrigation of third molar sockets reduce postoperative pain? A double blind controlled trial. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990 Apr; 28(2):96-8. Laskin JL Use of etidocaine hydrochloride in oral surgery: a clinical study. J Oral Surg. 1978 Nov; 36(11):863-5.
  9. Meechan JG, Blair GS The effect of two different local anaesthetic solutions on pain experience following apicectomy. Br Dent J. 1993 Dec 11-25; 175(11-12):410-3.
  10. Laskin JL, Wallace WR, DeLeo B Use of bupivacaine hydrochloride in oral surgery-a clinical study. J Oral Surg. 1977 Jan; 35(1):25-9. Nespeca JA Clinical trials with bupivacaine in oral surgery. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1976 Sep; 42(3):301-7. Pricco DF. An evaluation of bupivacaine for regional nerve block in oral surgery. J Oral Surg. 1977 Feb; 35(2): 126-9.
  11. Malamed SF, Gagnon S, Leblanc D. A comparison between articaine HCI and lidocaine HCI in pediatric dental patients. Pediatr Dent. 2000 Jul-Aug; 22(4):3O7-ll. Donaldson D, James-Perdok L, Craig BJ, Derkson GD, Richardson AS. A comparison of Ultracaine DS (articaine HCI) and Citanest forte (prilocaine HCI) in maxillary infiltration and mandibular nerve block. J Can Dent Assoc. 1987 Jan;53(l):38-42.
  12. Haas DA, Harper DG, Saso MA, Young ER. Lack of differential