Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2

Failure in post-core restorations

Post-kor uygulamalarında başarısızlıklar

Pages
41–51
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although there are no long time follow-up reports, fiber posts seemed to be the most suitable type when considering the type, compensation and the frequency of the failure.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To provide retention to the final restoration of endodontically treated teeth with severe tooth tissue loss one of the post-core systems is preferred.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this article, the types of failure in application of post-core are mentioned by performing a comprehensive literature review.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although there are no long time follow-up reports, fiber posts seemed to be the most suitable type when considering the type, compensation and the frequency of the failure.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

To provide retention to the final restoration of endodontically treated teeth with severe tooth tissue loss one of the post-core systems is preferred. In this article, the types of failure in application of post-core are mentioned by performing a comprehensive literature review. The most important factors effecting success are the establishment of the correct indication and following the main principles. Although there are no long time follow-up reports, fiber posts seemed to be the most suitable type when considering the type, compensation and the frequency of the failure.

Özet

Aşırı madde kaybına uğramış endodontik tedavili dişlerde, restorasyona tutuculuk sağlamak amacıyla post-kor sistemlerinden biri kullanılmaktadır. Bu makalede geniş bir literatür taraması yapılarak, post-kor uygulamalarında karşılaşılan başarısızlık tiplerinden söz edilmiştir. Başarıda rol oynayan en önemli etken doğru endikasyonun konulması ve uygulamada ana prensiplerin takip edilmesidir. Henüz uzun takip sonuçları olmamasına rağmen, başarısızlığın tipi, telafi edilebilirliği ve sıklığı bakımından en uygun olan post tipinin fiber destekli postlar olduğu görülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKSAL, T., DİKBAŞ, İ. (2022). Failure in post-core restorations. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 2, 41–51. https://ajindex.com/articles/452771

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Rrosthet Dent 1984; 52: 28-35.
  2. Goodacre CJ, Berna I G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 121-32.
  3. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-8.
  4. Ferrari M, Scotti R. Fiber posts: Characteristics and clinical applications. Birinci baskı, Masson S.p.A., Milano, Italy, 2002:121-30.
  5. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 2:153-8.
  6. Goodacre CJ, Kan JYK. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. In: Ingle JI, Bakland LK. Endodontics. BC Decker Inc., Canada, 2002; 913-50.
  7. Ottl P, Lauer HC Success rates for two different types of post-and-cores. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25: 752-8.
  8. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AHC, Sabrosa CE. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin North Am 2004; 48:397-416.
  9. Qualtrough AJE, Mannocci F. Tooth colored post systems: A review. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 86-91.
  10. Silness J, Gustavsen F, Hunsbeth J. Distribution of corrosion products in teeth restored with metal crowns retained by stainless steel posts. Ada Odontol Scand 1979; 37:317-21.
  11. TorbjornerA, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate. and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-44. Turner CH. Post-retained crown failure: a survey. Dent Update 1982; 9:193-202.
  12. Pitel ML, Hicks NL Evolving technology in endodontic posts. Compendium 2003; 24:13-29.
  13. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Mannocci F, Mason PN. Retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2000; 13 (Spec No): 9B-13B. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garda-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cores. Am J Dent 2000; 13: (Spec No): 15B-18B. Fredriksson M, Astback J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:151-7. Glazer B. Restoration of endodontically treated teeth with carbon fiber posts- A prospective study. J Can Dent Assoc 2000; 66: 613-8.
  14. Malferrari S, Monaco C, Scotti R. Clinical evaluation of teeth restored with quartz fiber reinforced epoxy resin posts. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16:39-44.
  15. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically t