SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1

Effect of different application methods of composite resings on microhardness

Farklı uygulama yöntemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin mikrosertlikleri üzerine etkisi

Kağan GÖKÇE
Mustafa ERSOY
Emre ÖZEL
Pages
28–31
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Data were analyzed by using Studentt-test, One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different application methods of composite resins on microhardness.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Test samples (2mm thick, 6mm in diameter, n=12) were prepared by using a hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3MESPE, St.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Data were analyzed by using Studentt-test, One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of different application methods of composite resins on microhardness. Materials and Methods: Test samples (2mm thick, 6mm in diameter, n=12) were prepared by using a hybrid composite (Filtek Z250, 3MESPE, St. Paul MN, USA). Following applications were performed on the surface of the specimens. Groupl: Direct application (only composite application). Group2: Composite application under mylar strip. Group3: Composite application with Panavia F Oxyguard II (Kuraray Medical Inc, Japan). Group4: Composite application with Biscover (Bisco, Inc. Schaumburg, IL, USA). The hardness test was performed using a digital microhardness tester (Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA)(load: 500 g; dwell time: 15 seconds). All samples were measured from the top and the bottom of the composite discs. Data were analyzed by using Studentt-test, One-Way ANOVA and Tukey's tests (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı uygulama yöntemlerinin kompozit rezinlerin mikrosertliğine olan etkisinin incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 2mm kalınlığında, 6mm çapında (n=12) test örnekleri, hibrid bir kompozit (Filtek Z250, 3MESPE, St. Paul MN, USA) kullanılarak hazırlandı. Örneklerin yüzeyine şu uygulamalar yapıldı: Grupl: Sadece direkt kompozit uygulaması yapıldı. Grup2: Mylar strip altında kompozit uygulandı. Grup3: Panavia F Oxyguard II (Kuraray Medical Inc, Japan) ile kompozit uygulaması yapıldı. Grup4: Biscover (Bisco, Inc. Schaumburg, İL, USA) ile kompozit uygulaması yapıldı. Sertlik testi, dijital mikrosertlik test cihazı(Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois, USA) (kuvvet: 500 g; dwell time: 15 saniye) kullanılarak gerçekleştirildi. Tüm örnekler üst ve alt yüzeylerinden ölçüldü. Veriler Student t-test, One-Way ANOVA ve Tu keys test ile analiz edildi (p

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKÇE, K., ERSOY, M., ÖZEL, E. (2022). Effect of different application methods of composite resings on microhardness. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 1, 28–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/452721

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 10 ed CV Mosby, St. Louis, 1997
  2. Kalachandra S. Influence of fillers on the water sorption of composites. Dental Materials 1989; 5(4): 283-8
  3. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz N. Measurement of water sorption in dental composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19(1-3): 77-83
  4. Meyer JM, Cattani-Lorente MA, Dupuis V. Compomers: between glass-ionomer cements and composites, Biomaterials 1998; 19(6): 529-39
  5. Mills RW, Uhl A, Blackwell GB, Jandt KD. High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomaterials: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radiometric properties. Biomaterials 2002; 23(14): 2955-63
  6. Özel E. Beş farklı restoratif materyalin su emiliminin distile suda ve yapay tükürükte in vitro incelenmesi. Yeditepe Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul, 2003, Master Tezi
  7. Özel E. Kompozit rezinlerin su emiciliği. Akademik Dental Dişhekimliği Dergisi 2002; 4(4): 25-8
  8. Price RB, Ehrnford L, Andreou P, Felix CA. Comparison of quartz-tungsten-halogen, lightemitting diode and plasma arc curing lights. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5(3): 193-207
  9. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuda M. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25(5): 358-64
  10. Gordan W, Patel SB, Barrett AA, Shen C. Effect of surface finishing and storage media on bi-axial flexure strength and microhardness of resin-based composite. Oper Dent 2003; 28(5): 560-7
  11. Yap AU, Wong ML, Lim AC. The effect of polishing systems on microleakage of tooth-coloured restoratives. Part 2: composite and polyacid-modified composite resins J Oral Rehabil 2000;27(3): 205-10
  12. Civelek A, Özel E. Işıkla Polimerize Olan Kompozitlerin Polimerizasyon Derinliği. Akademik Dental Dişhekimliği Dergisi 2004; 6(4): 34-8
  13. Cook WD. Factors affecting the depth of cure of UV-polymerized composites. J Dent Res 1980; 59(5): 800-8
  14. Chung SM, Yap AU. Effects of surface finish on identation modulus and hardness of dental composite restoratives. Dent Mater 2005; 21(11): 1008-16
  15. Jefferies SR. The art and science of abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42(4): 613-27
  16. Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives polished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22(6): 260-5
  17. Asmussen E Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of rema