Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Lower face profiloplasty with multidisciplinary treatment approach: a case report

Multidisipliner tedavi yaklaşımı ile alt yüz profiloplastisi: vaka raporu

Pages
119–124
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case report, multidisciplinary treatment approach of a young male patient who had a protrusive profile at lower third of the face with thick lower lip and class I skeletal relationship is prensented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Orthodontic treratment options are prefered for correction of malocclusions and protrusive profile in mandibular alveolar prognathism patients.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Orthodontic treatment provides excessive labial movement of maxillary incisors and lingual movement of mandibular incisors while does not make change on typical aspect of skeletal prognathism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case report, multidisciplinary treatment approach of a young male patient who had a protrusive profile at lower third of the face with thick lower lip and class I skeletal relationship is prensented.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Orthodontic treratment options are prefered for correction of malocclusions and protrusive profile in mandibular alveolar prognathism patients. Orthodontic treatment provides excessive labial movement of maxillary incisors and lingual movement of mandibular incisors while does not make change on typical aspect of skeletal prognathism. Mandibular alveolar osteotomy is an alternative treatment option for mandibular alveolar prognathism as a minor invasive surgical technique. This technique avoids the excessive movement of the teeth and corrects the skeletal prognatic appearance. In this case report, multidisciplinary treatment approach of a young male patient who had a protrusive profile at lower third of the face with thick lower lip and class I skeletal relationship is prensented.

Özet

Mandibular alveolar prognatizmi olan hastalarda, malokluzyonların ve protrüziv profilin düzeltilmesinde ortodontik tedavi yaklaşımları tercih edilmektedir. Ortodontik tedavi keserlerin maksillada labiale ve mandibulada da linguale aşırı hareketine neden olurken, iskeletsel prognatizmin karakteristik görünümünde değişikliğe yol açmaz. Mandibular alveolar prognatizmin tedavisinde minör invaziv cerrahi bir işlem olan mandibular alveolar osteotomi alternatif bir tedavi seçeneğidir. Bu teknik dişlerin aşırı hareket etmesini engellerken, iskeletsel prognatik görünümü de düzeltir. Bu vaka raporunda yüzün alt 1/3 lük kısmında kalın alt dudak ile birlikte protruziv bir profile sahip, klas I iskeletsel ilişkisi olan genç erkek hastanın multidisipliner yaklaşımla tedavisi sunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

YÜCEL, E., VEZİROĞLU, F., VARLIK, K. S., SOYDAN, S. S., ATAÇ, M. S. (2022). Lower face profiloplasty with multidisciplinary treatment approach: a case report. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 119–124. https://ajindex.com/articles/452563

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Yoshioka I, Khanal A, Tominaga K, Horie A, Furuta N, Fukuda J. Vertical ramus versus sagittal split osteotomies: comparison of stability after mandibular setback. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;66:1138-1144
  2. Ichida T, Kikuta T, Fukuda J, Yamada K. Treatment of Mandibular Alveolar prognatism by a Lower Anterior Subapical Osteotomy. J Clin Orthod 1998;32:747-752
  3. Proffit WR, White RP, Saver DM. Contemporary treatment of Dentofacial Deformities. 1st ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby: 2002. p. 394-415
  4. Bloomquist DS, Lee JL. In: Peterson’s Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2nd ed. Ontario; BC Decker Inc: 2004. p. 1135-1178
  5. Hausamen JE. The scientific development of maxillofacial surgery in the 20th century and an outlook into the future. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2001; 29: 2-21
  6. Silvestri A, Caputo A, Della Grotta AM. Segmental osteotomies of the mandible in the orthodontic surgical treatment of malformations of the facial bones. Ann Ital Chir 1990;61:125-139
  7. Mobarak KA, Krogsrad O, Espeland L,Lyberg T. Factors Influencing the predictability of soft tissue profile changes following mandibuler setback surgery. Angle Orthodontist 2001;71:216-227
  8. Gjørup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft-tissue and dentoskeletal profile changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1991;100:312-323
  9. Fanibunda KB. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1989;27:277-286
  10. Baek SM, Baek RM. Profiloplasty of the lower face by maxillary and mandibular anterior segmental osteotomies. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1993;17: 129-137
  11. Freihofer HP, Mooren RE. Profiloplasty: variations in personal views. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1997;25:249-253
  12. Iino M, Ohtani N, Niitsu K, Horiuchi T, Nakamura Y, Fukuda M. Two-stage orthognathic treatment of severe class III malocclusion: report of a case. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;42:170-172
  13. Lew KK, Loh FC. A comparison of profile changes between ramus and anterior mandibular subapical osteotomies in class III chinese patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:831-37
  14. Smith RG, Reed EH, Hendler BH. Fonseca Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1st ed. Philadelphia; WB Saunders Co: 2000. p. 491-511
  15. Schmitt SM, Cronin RJ Jr, Berg S. Anterior mandibular subapical osteotomy: a useful treatment for patients with severely worn mandibular anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:468-471.