SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Anadolu'nun üç farklı bölgesinden alınan propolis örneklerinin Antimikrobiyal aktivitelerinin in vitro olarak incelenmesi

In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from three different regions of anatolia

Alper KUŞTARCI
Zeynep SÜMER
Pages
82–87
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, 2.5% NaOCl was shown to be the most effective irrigant and statistically significant differences were found between 2.5% NaOCl and other experimental solutions against all microorganisms (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from Zara/Sivas, Trabzon and Aydın regions in Turkey by the agar diffusion method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Antimicrobial activities of different propolis extracts (10 and 20%) were tested against E. faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli and C. albicans, in the present study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, 2.5% NaOCl was shown to be the most effective irrigant and statistically significant differences were found between 2.5% NaOCl and other experimental solutions against all microorganisms (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from Zara/Sivas, Trabzon and Aydın regions in Turkey by the agar diffusion method. Antimicrobial activities of different propolis extracts (10 and 20%) were tested against E. faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli and C. albicans, in the present study. Microorganisms were inoculated into plates containing Mueller Hinton (MH) agar. Then round wells were punched in the cultivated agar plates and filled with test solutions. The MH agar plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C and diameters of inhibition zones around each well were then measured and recorded. The test was repeated 7 times for each solution. The results of the present study showed that 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and all propolis extracts showed antimicrobial activity against all microorganisms tested. However, 2.5% NaOCl was shown to be the most effective irrigant and statistically significant differences were found between 2.5% NaOCl and other experimental solutions against all microorganisms (p

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye'nin Zara/Sivas, Trabzon ve Aydın bölgelerinden alınan propolis örneklerinin, agar difüzyon yöntemi ile antimikrobiyal aktivitelerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışmada, farklı propolis ekstratlarının (%10 ve %20) E. faecalis, S. aureus, E. coli ve C. albicans üzerine olan antimikrobiyal aktiviteleri test edildi. Mikroorganizmalar Mueller Hinton (MH) agar içeren plaklara ekildi. Daha sonra ekim yapılan agar plaklarına kuyucuklar açıldı ve test solüsyonları ile dolduruldu. MH agar plakları 37°C'de 24 saat inkübe edildi ve inhibisyon alanlarının genişlikleri ölçülerek kaydedildi. Her solüsyon için bu test 7 kere tekrarlandı. Çalışmanın sonucunda, %2,5'lik sodyum hipoklorit (NaOCl) ve tüm propolis ekstratlarının test edilen mikroorganizmalara karşı antimikrobiyal aktivitesinin olduğu görüldü. Bununla birlikte, %2,5'lik NaOCl'nin en etkili irrigan olduğu ve tüm mikroorganizmalara karşı diğer solüsyonlarla arasında istatistiksel olarak fark olduğu görüldü (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞTARCI, A., SÜMER, Z. (2022). Anadolu'nun üç farklı bölgesinden alınan propolis örneklerinin Antimikrobiyal aktivitelerinin in vitro olarak incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 82–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/452537

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Sundqvist GK, Eckerbom MI, Larsson AP, Sjögren UT. Capacity of anaerobic bacteria from necrotic dental pulps to induce purulent infections. Infect Immun 1979; 25: 685-93
  2. Baumgartner JC, Watkins BJ, Bae KS, Xia T. Association of black-pigmented bacteria with endodontic infections. J Endod 1999; 25: 413-5
  3. Sundqvist GK, Johansson E, Sjögren UT. Prevalence of black-pigmented bacteroides species in root canal infections. J Endod 1989; 15: 13-9
  4. Moller AJR, Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Heyden G. Influence on periapical tissues of indigenous oral bacteria and necrotic pulp tissue in monkeys. Scand J Dent Res 1981; 89: 475-84
  5. Molander A, Reit C, Dahlen G, Kvist T. Microbiological status of root-filled teeth with apical periodontits. Int Endod J 1998; 31: 1-7
  6. Walton RE, Torabinejad M. Principles and practices of endodontics. 2nd ed. Philadelphia (PA): B. Saunders; 1996
  7. Harrison JW, Hand RE. The effect of dilution and organic matter on the antibacterial property of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endod 1981; 7: 128-32
  8. Izu KH, Thomas SJ, Zhang P, Izu AE, Michalek S. Effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite in preventing inoculation of periapical tissues with contaminated patency files. J Endod 2004; 30: 92-4
  9. Sabala CL, Powell SE. Sodium hypochlorite injection into periapical tissues. J Endod 1989; 15: 490-2
  10. Becking AG. Complications in the use of sodium hypochlorite during endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 346-8
  11. Ozturk B, Ozer F. Effect of NaOCl on bond strengths of bonding agents to pulp chamber lateral walls. J Endod 2004; 30: 362-5
  12. Uzel A, Sorkun K, Önçag Ö, Çogulu D, GenÇay Ö, Salih B. Chemical compositions and antimicrobial activities of four different Anatolian propolis samples. Microbiol Res 2005; 160: 189–95
  13. Gopikrishna V, Baweja PS, Venkateshbabu N, Kandaswamy D. Comparison of coconut water, propolis, HBSS, and milk on PDL cell survival. J Endod 2008; 34: 587–9
  14. Basrani B, Tjäderhane L, Santos JM, Pascon E, Grad H, Lawrence HP, Friedman S. Efficacy of chlorhexidine- and calcium hydroxide-containing medicaments against Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2003; 96: 618-24
  15. Jeansonne MJ, White RR. A comparison of 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite as antimicrobial endodontic irrigants. J Endod 1994; 20: 276–8
  16. Ayhan H, Sultan N, Çirak M, Ruhi MZ, Bodur H. Antimicrobial effects of various endodontic irr