SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Aerobic and anaerobic microbiologic investigations of periapical granulomas

Periapikal granulomların aerop ve anaerop mikrobiyolojik incelemesi

Cihan BEREKET
Murat METİN
Mustafa TEK
İsmail ŞENER
Adil KARADAĞ
Pages
272–276
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that some of the periapical granulomas were found to be polymicrobial by nature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To determine microorganisms in periapical granulomas using modern laboratory techniques and to discuss the results in the light of the recent literature.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Specimens of periapical granuloma were obtained by apical curettage from 35 patients, 15 male and 20 female.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that some of the periapical granulomas were found to be polymicrobial by nature.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To determine microorganisms in periapical granulomas using modern laboratory techniques and to discuss the results in the light of the recent literature. Material and Methods: Specimens of periapical granuloma were obtained by apical curettage from 35 patients, 15 male and 20 female. Aerobic and anaerobic microbiologic cultures were performed for each specimen. Statistical analyses were conducted on the data that were collected. Results: Microorganisms were isolated only in 11 of the 35 clinical materials (31,42%). The percentages of the isolated microorganisms were: Streptococcus sanguis (20 %), Streptococcus anginosus (13,3 %), Streptococcus constellatus (13,3 %), Streptococcus milleri (13,3 %), Propionibacterium acnes (6,6 %), Bacteroides capillosus (6,6 %), Staphylococcus xylosus (6,6 %), Actinomyces meyeri (6,6 %), and Candida albicans (6,6 %). Conclusion: Different types of Streptococcus were found to be most common bacteria among the isolated microorganisms. The results showed that some of the periapical granulomas were found to be polymicrobial by nature.

Özet

Amaç: Modern laboratuar teknikleri kullanarak periapikal granulomlardaki mikroorganizmaları tespit etmek ve güncel literatür ışığında tartışmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: 15’i erkek, 20’si kadın toplam 35 hastadan, apikal küretaj yöntemi ile periapikal granulom örnekleri alındı. Daha sonra, her bir örneğin aerop ve anaerop mikrobiyolojik kültürleri oluşturuldu. Sonuçlar istatistiksel olarak değerlendirildi. Bulgular: 35 klinik materyalin 11 tanesinden (% 31,42) mikroorganizma izole edildi. İzole edilen mikroorganizmaların yüzde sıklık sırası: Streptococcus sanguis (% 20), Streptococcus anginosus (% 13,3), Streptococcus constellatus (% 13,3), Streptococcus milleri (% 13,3), Propionibacterium acnes (% 6,6), Bacteroides capillosus (% 6,6), Staphylococcus xylosus (% 6,6), Actinomyces meyeri (% 6,6), Candida albicans (% 6,6) tır. Sonuç: İzole edilen mikroorganizmalar içerisinde en sık streptokok türü bakteriler olduğu belirlendi. Bu sonuçlara göre periapikal granulomların doğası gereği polimikrobiyal olabileceği gözlemlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

BEREKET, C., METİN, M., TEK, M., ŞENER, İ., KARADAĞ, A. (2022). Aerobic and anaerobic microbiologic investigations of periapical granulomas. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 272–276. https://ajindex.com/articles/452527

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Boyle PE. Intracellular bacteria in a dental granuloma. J Dent Res 1934;14:297-301
  2. Iwu C, MacFarlane TW, MacKenzie D, Stenhouse D. The microbiology of periapical granulomas. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990;69(4):502-5
  3. Samaranayake LP, Stassen LF, Still DM. A microbiological study of pre- and postoperative apicoectomy sites. Clin Oral Investig 1997;1(2):77- 80
  4. Abou-Rass M, Bogen G. Microorganisms in closed periapical lesions. Int Endod J 1998;31(1):39-47
  5. Yamamoto K, Fukushima H, Tsuchiya H, Sagawa H. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Eubacterium, Peptostreptococcus, and Bacteroides isolated from root canals of teeth with periapical pathosis. J Endod 1989;15(3):112-6
  6. Haapasalo M, Ranta H, Ranta KT. Facultative gram-negative enteric rods in persistent periapical infections. Acta Odontol Scand 1983;41(1):19-22
  7. Akimoto Y, Kaneko K, Fujii A, Yamamoto H. Ampicillin concentrations in human radicular granuloma following a single oral dose of bacampicillin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1992; 50(1): 11-3
  8. Akimoto Y, Mochizuki Y, Uda A, et al. Josamycin concentrations in radicular cysts following a single oral administration. Gen Pharmacol 1993; 24(1): 143-5
  9. Lewis MA, McGowan DA, MacFarlane TW. Short- course high-dosage amoxycillin in the treatment of acute dento-alveolar abscess. Br Dent J 1986; 161(8):299-302
  10. Wayman BE, Murata SM, Almeida RJ, Fowler CB. A bacteriological and histological evaluation of 58 periapical lesions. J Endod 1992;18(4):152-5
  11. Andreasen JO, Rud J. A histobacteriologic study of dental and periapical structures after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1972;1(5):272-81
  12. Langeland K, Block RM, Grossman LI. A histopathologic and histobacteriologic study of 35 periapical endodontic surgical specimens. J Endod 1977; 3(1):8-23
  13. Nair PN, Sjogren U, Krey G, Kahnberg KE, Sundqvist G. Intraradicular bacteria and fungi in root-filled, asymptomatic human teeth with therapy-resistant periapical lesions: a long-term light and electron microscopic follow-up study. J Endod 1990;16(12):580-8.