Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2

Conventional and adhesive dental luting agents; A literature review

Geleneksel ve adeziv dental simanlar hakkında bir derleme çalışması

Pages
205–216
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this literature review, luting agents and their proporties are explained in order to give information to the dentist which can be useful in clinical practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Fixed prosthodontic approaches in restorative dentistry are changed with the introduction of innovative techniques and materials in recent years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With this change, improvements and modification of luting agents became mandotary.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this literature review, luting agents and their proporties are explained in order to give information to the dentist which can be useful in clinical practice.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Fixed prosthodontic approaches in restorative dentistry are changed with the introduction of innovative techniques and materials in recent years. With this change, improvements and modification of luting agents became mandotary. Luting agents provide the mechanical bond and adhesion between a fixed prosthesis and the supporting tooth structure. Zinc phosphate and zinc polycarboxylate cements retained their popularity for luting fixed prosthodontic restorations. Their disadvantages are particularly solubility and lack of adhesion. In order to struggle these problems glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer luting agents are firstly developed. Recently resin cements became popular, primarily because they overcame the disadvantages of solubility and lack of adhesion. In this literature review, luting agents and their proporties are explained in order to give information to the dentist which can be useful in clinical practice.

Özet

Son yıllarda sabit protetik yaklaşımlardaki teknik ve materyallerin değişimi simanların geliştirilmesini zorunlu hale getirmiştir. Simanlar sabit protetik restorasyon ve destek diş dokusu arasında mekanik bağlanma ve adezyon sağlar. Çinko fosfat simanlar ve çinko polikarboksilat simanlar sabit protetik restorasyonların yapıştırılmasında güncelliğini korumaktadırlar. Ancak adezyon eksikliği ve çözünürlük gibi dezavantajları vardır. Bu gibi sorunları gidermek için ilk olarak cam iyonomer simanlar ve reçine modifiye cam iyonomer simanlar geliştirilmiştir. Son zamanlarda ise reçine simanlar çözünürlük ve adezyon eksikliği gibi dezavantajların üstesinden geldikleri için kullanımı yaygınlanmıştır. Bu derleme çalışmasında simanlar ve taşıması gereken özellikler açıklanarak, hekime klinik pratiğinde kullanabileceği bilgiler verilmeye çalışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

EKREN, O., KURTOĞLU, C., KÖROĞLU, A. (2022). Conventional and adhesive dental luting agents; A literature review. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 2, 205–216. https://ajindex.com/articles/452509

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. O’Brien WJ. Dental Materials and Their Selection,3rd ed. Canada, Quintessence, 2002: p.132,35-143,46. 1. Pegoraro TA, da Silva NR, Carvalho RM. Cements for use in esthetic dentistry. Dent Clin North Am. 2007
  2. 51(2):453-471 2. Diaz-Arnold AM, Vargas MA, Haselton DR. Current status of luting agents for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1999
  3. :135-141. 3. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues, 1st ed. Chicago, Quintessence,1998. p.97 4. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Bacterial growth and pulpal changes under inlays cemented with zinc phosphate cement and Epoxylite CBA 9080. J Prosthet Dent 1974
  4. :556. 5. Brannstrom M, Nyborg H. Comparison of pulpal effect of two liners. Acta Odontol Scand 1969
  5. :443–451. 6. Akyor A. Tanalp J. Operatif Dişhekimliğinde Gelişmeler Güncel Pratik Uygulamalar Cilt 1. Birinci baskı. İstanbul, Quintessence 2006. s:98 7. Rosenstiel SF, Land MF, Crispin BJ. Dental luting agents: A review of the current litarature. J Prosthet Dent 1998
  6. : 280-301 8. Önal B, Restoratif Dişhekimliğinde Maddeler ve Uygulamaları, Birinci baskı, Ege Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Yayınları İzmir, 2004 p.111- 14,128-29 9. Caughman WF, Caughman GB, Dominy WT, Schuster GS. Glass ionomer and composite resin cements: effects on oral cells. J Prosthet Dent 1990
  7. :513-521. 10. Fitzgerald M, Heys RJ, Heys DR, Charbeneau GT. An evaluation of aglass ionomer luting agent: bacterial leakage. J Am Dent Assoc 1987
  8. :783-786 11. Inoue S, Abe Y, Yoshida Y, De Munck J, Sano H, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effects of conditioner on bond strength of glass-ionomer adhesive to dentin/enamel with and without smear layer interposition. Oper Dent 2004
  9. 29(6):685–692 12. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P. Four-year water degradation of a resinmodified glass-ionomer adhesive bonded to dentin. Eur J Oral Sci 2004
  10. 112(1):73–83. 13. Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Glassionomer adhesion: the mechanisms at the interface, J Dent 2006:615–617. 14. Yli-Urpo H, Lassila LVJ, Narhi TO, Valittu PK. Compressive strength and surface characterization of glass ionomer cements modified by particles of bioactive glass. Dent Mater 2005
  11. :201–209. 15. Yli-Urpo H, Forsback AP, Vakiparta M, Narhi TO, Valittu PK. Release of silica, calcium, phosphorus and fluoride fromglass ionomer cement containing bioactive glass. J Biomater Appl 2004
  12. :5–20. 16. Palmer G, Jonesa FH, Billingtonb RW, Pearson GJ.