SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

AN EFFICACY EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION ACTIVATION SOLUTIONS FOR REMOVAL OF CALCIUM HYDROXIDE AND CHLORHEXIDINE GEL/CALCIUM HYDROXIDE COMBINATION PASTE FROM ROOT CANAL SYSTEMS

KALSİYUM HİDROKSİT VE KLORHEKSİDİN JEL/KALSİYUM HİDROKSİT KANAL İÇİ MEDİKAMANLARININ FARKLI İRRİGASYON AKTİVASYON YÖNTEMLERİ İLE KÖK KANALINDAN UZAKLAİTIRMA ETKİNLİĞİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

İsmail UZUN
Özgür Soysal ÖZDEMİR
Pages
524–533
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Maleic acid irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation activation was found as the most efficient method, however none of the tested methods was able to render canal systems free of medicaments

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation solutions and irrigation techniques for removal of root-canal filling paste from root canal systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Removal of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine gel/ calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments from root canals attempted with using 3 different irrigation solutions ( NaOCl, qmix and maleic acide) activated by 4 activation techniques ( needle/syringe irrigation, Endoactivator, Endovac ve passive ultrasonic irrigation).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Maleic acid irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation activation was found as the most efficient method, however none of the tested methods was able to render canal systems free of medicaments
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different irrigation solutions and irrigation techniques for removal of root-canal filling paste from root canal systems. Materials and Methods: Removal of calcium hydroxide, chlorhexidine gel/ calcium hydroxide intracanal medicaments from root canals attempted with using 3 different irrigation solutions ( NaOCl, qmix and maleic acide) activated by 4 activation techniques ( needle/syringe irrigation, Endoactivator, Endovac ve passive ultrasonic irrigation). Remaining medicaments within root canals explorated under stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Bonferronni corrected MannWhitney U tests (p= 0.05). Results: Its found that maleic acid of irrigation solutions and passive ultrasonic irrigation of activation techniques was significantly superior to other tested methods in removing both calcium hydroxide and chlorhexidine gel/calcium hydroxide combined root canal medicaments from root canals (P0.05). Conclusions: Irrigation activation methods are required for efficient removal of intracanal medicaments from root canal system. Maleic acid irrigation and passive ultrasonic irrigation activation was found as the most efficient method, however none of the tested methods was able to render canal systems free of medicaments

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı; farklı irrigasyon solüsyonlarının,aktivasyon yöntemleri ile aktive edildiktensonra, kök kanal tedavisi sırasında kullanılan kanal içimedikamanlarını, kök kanallarından uzaklaştırmaetkinliklerinin değerlendirilmesidir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Dişlere uygulanan kanal içi medikamanlardankalsiyum hidroksit ve klorheksidin jel/kalsiyumhidroksit, 3 farklı irrigasyon solüsyonu (NaOCl,Qmix ve Maleik asit), 4 farklı aktivasyon tekniği (iğne/şırınga irrigasyonu, Endoaktivatör, Endovac ve pasifultrasonik irrigasyon) ile aktive edilerek kök kanallarındanuzaklaştırılmaya çalışıldı. Kök kanallarında kalanmedikaman miktarı steromikroskop ile incelendi. Eldeedilen veriler Kruskal Wallis ve Bonferoni düzeltmeliMann-Whitney U testleri ile istatistiksel olarak analizedildi (p = 0.05).Bulgular: İrrigasyon solüsyonlarından maleik asit veirrigasyon aktivasyon yöntemlerinden pasif ultrasonikirrigasyon aktivasyon yöntemi, hem kalsiyum hidroksitihem de klorheksidin jel/kalsiyum hidroksit kombinasyonunuuzaklaştırmada diğer yöntemlere göre istatikselolarak anlamlı derecede daha etkili bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

UZUN, İ., ÖZDEMİR, Ö. S. (2022). AN EFFICACY EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT IRRIGATION ACTIVATION SOLUTIONS FOR REMOVAL OF CALCIUM HYDROXIDE AND CHLORHEXIDINE GEL/CALCIUM HYDROXIDE COMBINATION PASTE FROM ROOT CANAL SYSTEMS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 524–533. https://ajindex.com/articles/452435

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Bystrom A, Claesson R, Sundqvist G. The antibacterial effect of camphorated paramonochlorophenol, camphorated phenol and calcium hydroxide in the treatment of infected root canals. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:170-5.
  2. Siqueira JF, Machado AG, Silveira RM, Lopes HP, de Uzeda M. Evaluation of the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite used with three irrigation methods in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis from the root canal, in vitro. Int Endod J 1997;30:279-82.
  3. Siqueira JF, Lopes HP. Mechanisms of antimicrobial activity of calcium hydroxide: a critical review. Int Endod J 1999; 32, 361-9.
  4. Ricucci D, Langeland K. Incomplete calcium hydroxide removal from the root canal: a case report. Int Endod J 1997;30:418-21.
  5. Margelos J, Eliades G, Verdelis C, Palaghias G. Interaction of calcium hydroxide with zinc oxideeugenol type sealers: a potential clinical problem. J Endod 1997; 23, 43–8.
  6. Tatsuta CT, Morgan LA, Baumgartner JC, Adey JD. Effect of calcium hydroxide and four irrigation regimens on instrumented and uninstrumented canal wall topography. J Endod 1999;25:93-8.
  7. Calt S, Serper A. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers after root canal dressing with calcium hydroxide. J Endod 1999;25:431-3
  8. Capar ID, Ozcan E, Arslan H, et al. Effect of different final irrigation methods on the removal of calcium hydroxide from an artificial standardized groove in the apical third of root canals. J Endod 2014;40:451–4.
  9. Kenee DM, Allemang JD, Johnson JD, et al. A quantitative assessment of efficacy of various calcium hydroxide removal techniques. J Endod. 2006; 32:563-5.
  10. Townsend C, Maki J. An in vitro comparison of new irrigation and agitation techniques to ultrasonik agitation in removing bacteria from a simulated root canal. J Endod 2009; 35: 1040-3.
  11. Desai P, Himel V. Comparative safety of various intracanal irrigation systems. J Endod 2009; 35(4): 545-9.
  12. Rodig T, Hirschleb M, Zapf A, et al. Comparison of ultrasonic irrigation and RinsEndo for the removal of calcium hydroxide and Ledermix paste from root canals. Int Endod J 2011;44:1155–61.
  13. Lambrianidis T, Margelos J, Beltes P. Removal efficiency of calcium hydroxide dressing from the root canal. J Endod 1999;25:85-8.
  14. Akyüz Ekim ŞF, Erdemir A. Endodontide İrrigasyon Aktivasyon Yöntemleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2015; 25(Supp10): 98-104.
  15. Gu LS, Kim JR, Ling J, Choi KK, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Review of contemporary irrigant agitation techniques and devices. J Endod 2009;35: 791- 804. Rodig T, Vogel S, Zapf A,