Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

Assesement of dental implant success and patient profile: A retrospective study

Dental implant başarısının ve hasta profilinin değerlendirilmesi: Retrospektif bir çalışma

Pages
1–8
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Smoking and periodontal disease are important factors affecting the success of the implant.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: This study made in 2010-2011 years and Xive Straumann dental implants and implant failure was evaluated on the factors influencing the determination of the profile of patients who have sought to implant.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: At 2010-2011 years 79 patients evaluated pose risks of dental implant treatment in the parameters (systemic disease, smoking, implant dimensions, due to loss of teeth, chin implant is placed and thearea, additional surgical procedures), 193 implants were placed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Smoking and periodontal disease are important factors affecting the success of the implant.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010-2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: This study made in 2010-2011 years and Xive Straumann dental implants and implant failure was evaluated on the factors influencing the determination of the profile of patients who have sought to implant. Material and Methods: At 2010-2011 years 79 patients evaluated pose risks of dental implant treatment in the parameters (systemic disease, smoking, implant dimensions, due to loss of teeth, chin implant is placed and thearea, additional surgical procedures), 193 implants were placed. Patients’sclinical and radiographic evaluations were recorded in control sessions. The success rate of implant survival was evaluated as the mouth. Placement date of the implant and the implant’s lost date or time intervalbetween the last control period was considered to be survival of the implant in the mouth. Results: In this study, a total of 193 implants were evaluated in 79 patients. 6 patients fully edentulous, 73 had partial edentulism. 20 patients with partial edentulous had single tooth loss and 19 patients had was more than one tooth loss . In 34 patients had edentulous dentition finite. 50 patients had lost the tooth due to tooth caries and endodontic problems, 28 patients had lost the tooth as a result of periodontal disease occurred in were identified. İn this study the implant loss rate is 2.6%. 4 implants had lost because of the periimplantitis before loading, and 1 had lost after installing. Conclusion: In this study the success rate of implants is 97.4%. Smoking and periodontal disease are important factors affecting the success of the implant.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışma 2010-2011 yıllarında yapılmışStraumann ve Xive dental implantların implant başa- rısızlığını etkileyen faktörlere göre değerlendirilmesinive implant yaptıran hastaların profilinin belirlenmesini amaçladı.Gereç ve Yöntem: 2010-2011 yıllarında 79 hastayadental implant tedavisi için risk oluşturacak para- metreler değerlendirilerek (sistemik hastalık, sigara,implantın boyutları, diş kayıp nedeni, implantınyerleştirildiği çene ve bölge, ilave cerrahi işlemler) 193 implant yerleştirildi. Klinik ve radyografik değerlendir-meler hastaların kontrol seanslarında kaydedildi. İmplant başarısı ağızda kalım oranı olarak değerlen- dirildi. İmplantın yerleştirilmesi ve son kontrol arası süre veya implantın kaybedildiği zaman aralığı imp-lantın ağızda kalım süresi olarak kabul edildi. Bulgular: Bu çalışmada toplam 79 hastaya yapılan 193 implant değerlendirildi. Hastaların 6’sı tam dişsiziken, 73’ü kısmi dişsizliğe sahipti. Kısmi dişsiz hasta-ların 20’sinde tek diş eksikliği, 19’unda dişli sonlananbirden fazla diş eksikliği görüldü. 34 hasta ise dişsiz sonlanan vakalardı. Hasta öykülerinde 50 hastada diş kayıplarının çürük ve endodontik problem nedeniyle,28 hastada ise periodontal hastalıklar sonucu diş ka- yıplarının meydana geldiği tespit edildi. Bu çalışmadaimplant kayıp oranı %2.6’dır. Kaybedilen implantların 4’ü periimplantitis nedeniyle yüklemeden önce kaybe-dilirken, 1’i yüklemeden sonra implant boyun kırığı nedeniyle kaybedildi. Sonuç: İmplantların başarı oranı %97,4’dür. Sigarave periodontal hastalık implant başarısını etkileyenönemli faktörlerdendir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, M. M., UZUN, İ. H., ELTAS, A., DÜNDAR, S. (2022). Assesement of dental implant success and patient profile: A retrospective study. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 1–8. https://ajindex.com/articles/452374

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Branemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J. & Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scandinavian Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Hand Surgery1969; 3: 81-100
  2. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP,Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long- term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral İmpl Res 1997;8: 161-72
  3. Petricevic N, Celebic A, Rener-Sitar K. A 3-year longitudinal study of quality-of-life outcomes of elderly patients with implant- and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures in posterior dental regions. Gerodontology 2012; 29:e956-63
  4. Leite-Cavalcanti A, Menezes SA, Granville-Garcia AF, Correia-Fontes LB. Prevalence of early loss of primary molars: Study retrospective. Acta Sci Health Sci 2008; 30: 139–43
  5. Donos N, Laurell L, Mardas N Hierarchical decisions on teeth vs. implants in the periodontitis- susceptible patient: the modern dilemma. Periodontology 2000 2012; 59: 89–110
  6. Carcuac O, Jansson L. Peri-implantitis in a specialist clinic of periodontology. Clinical features and risk indicators. Swed Dent J 2010; 34: 53–61
  7. Heitz-Mayfield LJ. Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. J Clin Periodontol 2008; Suppl. 8: 292–304
  8. Moy PK, Medina D, Shetty V, Aghaloo TL. Dental implant failurerates and associated risk factors. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 569-77
  9. Lindeboom JA, Frenken JW, Dubois L, Frank M, Abbink I, Kroon FH. Immediate loading versus immediate provisionalisation of maxillary single- tooth replacements: a prospective randomized study with BioComp implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006; 64: 936-42
  10. Alberkston T, Zarb G, Worhington P,Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1986; 1: 11-25
  11. Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Singh M, Weber HP, Galucci GO. Success Criteria in Implant dentistry: A systematic review. J Dent Res 2012;91:242-8
  12. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J,Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival and failure: The International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008; 17: 5-15
  13. Smith RA, Berger R, Do