Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

EFFECT OF BRUSHING AND WHITENING-TOOTHPASTE ON SURFACE PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITES

FIRÇALAMANIN VE BEYAZLATICILI DİŞ MACUNLARIN KOMPOZİTLERİN YÜZEY ÖZELLİKLERİNE ETKİSİ?

Pages
22–32
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Statistical significance level was established at p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: Purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the effect of brushing and two different whitening toothpaste brushing on surface roughness and microhardness of four different type of composites (hybrid, nanohybrid, nanofilledand silorane based composites).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: 80 composite samples were prepared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Statistical significance level was established at p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: Purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the effect of brushing and two different whitening toothpaste brushing on surface roughness and microhardness of four different type of composites (hybrid, nanohybrid, nanofilledand silorane based composites). Material and Methods: 80 composite samples were prepared. Samples were classified into 4 main groups (n=20): Control,Colgate Motion Whitening Toothbrush (CWT),Opalescence Whitening Toothpaste (OWT) and Beyond Pearl White Toothpaste (BPW). Control group was stored in distilled water for 14 day, as baseline. CWT brushing were applied 2 minutes a day with distilled water or OWT or BPW for 14 days. After 14 days, surface roughness (Sa) was measured by noncontact 3D laser profilometer and surface hardness (VHN) were measured by Vickers tester. SEM Evaluation was done under x750. Kruskal Wallis, post Hoc Dunn's multiple comparison, Mann Whitney U tests were used in the comparison of groups. Statistical significance level was established at p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı diş fırçası ve beyazlatıcı etkili dişmacunları ile fırçalama sonrası dört farklı kompozitin (hibrid, nanohibrid, nanofil ve siloran yapıda) yüzey pürüzlülüğü ve mikro sertliğinin in vitro incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: 80 adet örnek; Kontrol, Colgate Hareketli Beyazlatıcı Diş fırçası (CWT), Opalescence Beyazlatıcı Diş Macunu (OWT) ve Beyond Pearl White Diş Macunu (BPW) olmak üzere 4 ana gruba ayrıldı (n=20). Kontrol grubundaki örnekler 2 hafta boyunca distile suda bekletildi. Deney gruplarında ise; CWT ile sadece distile su ile fırçalama yapılırken; OWT ve de BPW dişmacunları ile ise günde 2 dakikadan 14 gün boyunca fırçalama yapıldı. 14 gün sonra yüzey pürüzlülüğü değeri (Sa) temassız üç boyutlu lazer profilometresi ile değerlendirilirken; yüzey sertlik değerleri Vickers testi ile ölçüldü. SEM incelemesi, x750 büyütmede yapıldı. İstatistiksel olarak Kruskal Wallis, post Hoc Dunn's multiple comparison, Mann Whitney U testleri grupların karşılaştırılmasında kullanıldı. İstatistiksel değerlendirme p

🔖

Cite This Article

TOPBAŞI, F. B., ATALI, P. Y., ÖKSÜZ, M. (2022). EFFECT OF BRUSHING AND WHITENING-TOOTHPASTE ON SURFACE PROPERTIES OF COMPOSITES. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 22–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/452293

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Hossain A, Okawa S, Miyakawa O. Effect of toothbrushing on titanium surface: an approach to understanding surface properties of brushed titanium. Dent Mater 2006; 22:346-52.
  2. Abouelatta OB, AA Abdel-Samad and AA Sakrana. Wear and surface roughness of current veneered materials after toothbrush/ dentifrice abrasion. J. Mater. Process. Technol 2005, 168: 431-7.
  3. Sharif N, MacDonald E, Hughes J, Newcombe RG, Addy M. The chemical stain removal properties of 'whitening' toothpaste products: studies in vitro. Br Dent J 2000; 10:620-4.
  4. Worschech CC, Rodrigues JA, Martins LR, Ambrosano GM. Brushing effect of abrasive dentifrices during at-home bleaching with 10% carbamide peroxide on enamel surface roughness. J Contemp Dent Pract 2006; 15:25-34.
  5. Amaral CM, Rodrigues JA, Erhardt MC, Araujo MW, Marchi GM, Heymann HO, Pimenta LA.Effect of whitening dentifrices on the superficial roughness of esthetic restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent 2006; 18:102-8.
  6. Maldupa I, Brinkmane A, Rendeniece I, Mihailova A. Evidence based toothpaste classification, according to certain characteristics of their chemical composition. Stomatologija. 2012;14:12- 22. Joiner A Whitening toothpastes: a review of the literature. J Dent. 2010;38 Suppl 2:e17-24. Camargo IM, Saiki M, Vasconcellos MB, Avila DM. (2001). Abrasiveness evaluation of silica and calcium carbonate used in the production of dentifrices. J Cosmet Sci 2001; 52:163-7.
  7. Liljeborg A, Tellefsen G, Johannsen G. The use of a profilometer for both quantitative and qualitative measurements of toothpaste abrasivity. Int J Dent Hygiene 2010; 8:237-243.
  8. Lewis R, Dwyer-Joyce RS, Pickles MJ. Interaction between toothbrushes and toothpaste abrasive particles in simulated tooth cleaning. Wear 2004; 257:368-76.
  9. Heintze SD, Forjanic M, Ohmiti K, Rousson V. Surface deterioration of dental materials after simulated toothbrushing in relation to brushing time and load. Dent Mater 2010; 26:306-19.
  10. Lea SC, Khan A, Patanwala HS, Landini G, Walmsley AD. The effects of load and toothpaste on powered toothbrush vibrations. J Dent 2007; 35:350-4.
  11. Neme AL, Frazier KB, Roeder LB, Debner TL. Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent 2002; 27:50-8.
  12. Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M.Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface roughness for bacterial plaque retention: A review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13:258-69. Dabanoğlu A. Nano kompoz