SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF FLUORIDE UPTAKE FROM FOUR DIFFERENT FLUORIDE- RELEASING RESTORATIVE MATERIALS BY BOVINE ENAMEL: IN VITRO STUDY

DÖRT FARKLI FLUORİD SALINIMI YAPAN RESTORATİF MATERYALDEN FLUORİD EMİLİMİNİN SIĞIR MİNESİNDE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: İN VİTRO ÇALIŞMA

Aysel BERKKAN
Nurhan ÖZTAŞ
Mehmet BANI
Didem ATABEK
Pages
226–231
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Glass ionomers and giomer had significantly higher fluoride uptake than compomer (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the fluoride uptake from four different of fluoride releasing restorative materials by bovine enamel and to determine the effect of time on this uptake.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 120 bovine enamel slabs were prepared from the buccal surfaces of the bovine teeth.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Glass ionomers and giomer had significantly higher fluoride uptake than compomer (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the fluoride uptake from four different of fluoride releasing restorative materials by bovine enamel and to determine the effect of time on this uptake. Material and Method: A glass ionomer cement (Fuji II), resin-modified glass ionomer cement(Fuji II LC), giomer (Beautifil) and compomer (Dyract AP) were elected. A total of 120 bovine enamel slabs were prepared from the buccal surfaces of the bovine teeth. The slabs were divided into 5 subgroups (n=6) representing 5 time intervals (1, 7, 14, 21 and 35 days). Fluoride-ion selective electrode method was used to determine the enamel fluoride uptake was determined. Results: Glass ionomers and giomer had significantly higher fluoride uptake than compomer (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı fluorid salınımı yapan 4 farklı tip restoratif materyalin sığır dişlerinin minesinde flourid emilimini karşılaştırmak ve bu emilime zamanın etkisini belirlemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada cam iyonomer siman (Fuji II), rezin modifiye cam iyonomer siman (Fuji II LC), giomer (Beautifil) ve kompomer (Dyract AP) materyalleri kullanıldı. Sığır dişinin minesinin bukkal yüzeylerinden toplam120 adet örnek hazırlandı. Örnekler her bir materyal grubu için 5 zaman aralığını (1, 7, 14, 21 ve 35 gün) temsil eden 5 alt gruba (n =6) ayrıldı. Fluorid emilimini belirlemek icin florür iyonu seçici elektrot yöntemi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Cam iyonomerler ve giomer kompomere göre (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BERKKAN, A., ÖZTAŞ, N., BANI, M., ATABEK, D. (2022). EVALUATION OF FLUORIDE UPTAKE FROM FOUR DIFFERENT FLUORIDE- RELEASING RESTORATIVE MATERIALS BY BOVINE ENAMEL: IN VITRO STUDY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 226–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/452288

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ahiropoulos V, Helvatjoglu-Antoniades M, Papadogiannis Y. In vitro fluoride uptake by bovine enamel from aesthetic restorative materials. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18:291-9
  2. Dionysopoulos D, Koliniotou-Koumpia E, Helvatzoglou-Antoniades M, Kotsanos N. Fluoride release and recharge abilities of contemporary fluoride-containing restorative materials and dental adhesives. Dent Mater J 2013;32:296-304
  3. Ozdemir-Ozenen D, Sungurtekin E, Issever H, Sandalli N. Surface roughness of fluoride-releasing restorative materials after topical fluoride application. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2013;14:68-72
  4. Naoum S, Ellakwa A, Martin F, Swain M. Fluoride release, recharge and mechanical property stability of various fluoride-containing resin composites. Oper Dent 2011;36:422-32
  5. Moreau JL, Xu HH. Fluoride releasing restorative materials: Effects of pH on mechanical properties and ion release. Dent Mater 2010;26:e227-35
  6. Mitra SB, Oxman JD, Falsafi A, Ton TT. Fluoride release and recharge behavior of a nano-filled resin-modified glass ionomer compared with that of other fluoride releasing materials. Am J Dent 2011;24:372-8
  7. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V. Effect of xylitol versus sorbitol: a quantitative systematic review of clinical trials. Int Dent J 2012;62:175-88
  8. Stoodley P, Wefel J, Gieseke A, Debeer D, von Ohle C. Biofilm plaque and hydrodynamic effects on mass transfer, fluoride delivery and caries. J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139:1182-90
  9. Sari ME, Ozmen B. Comparison of different resinmodified glass ionomer cements of water sorption and microleakage values used in. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2013;21:43-9
  10. Dhull KS, Nandlal B. Effect of low-concentration daily topical fluoride application on fluoride release of giomer and compomer: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2011;29:39-45
  11. Tay WM, Braden M. Fluoride ion diffusion from polyalkenoate (glass-ionomer) cements. Biomaterials 1988;9:454-6
  12. Roberts TA, Miyai K, Ikemura K, Fuchigami K, Kitamura T. Fluoride ion sustained release performed glass ionomer filler and dental compositions containing the same. Uniited States Patent No. 5,883,153;1999. 13.Ikemura K, Tay FR, Kouro Y, Endo T, Yoshiyama M, Miyai K, Pashley DH. Optimizing filler content in an adhesive system containing pre-reacted glassionomer fillers. Dent Mater 2003;19:137-46. 14.Itota T, Carrick TE, Yoshiyama M, McCabe JF. Fluoride release and recharge in giomer, compomer and resin composite. Dent Mater 2004;20:789-95
  13. Duckwort