Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

RETREATMENT OF ROOT CANAL FILLINGS PERFORMED WITH A CALCIUM SILICATE BASED ROOT CANAL SEALER AND GUTTA-PERCHA WITH DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL SOLVENTS

ALSİYUM SİLİKAT İÇERİKLİ BİR KÖK KANAL PATI VE GUTTA-PERKA KULLANILARAK YAPILMIŞ KÖK KANAL DOLGULARININ FARKLI KÖK KANAL SOLVENTLERİ İLE YENİDEN KANAL TEDAVİSİ

Pages
219–225
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Root fillings performed with MTA Fillapex® and gutta percha could be retreated with the solvents used in the study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiencies of different conventional solvents on the removal of root fillings performed with MTA Fillapex root canal sealer and gutta- percha.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Sample lengths were adjusted to 16 mm and root canal preparations were performed with K3 instruments up to 30/.04 size.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Root fillings performed with MTA Fillapex® and gutta percha could be retreated with the solvents used in the study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficiencies of different conventional solvents on the removal of root fillings performed with MTA Fillapex root canal sealer and gutta- percha. Material and Method: Forty-five maxillary central incisorshuman teeth were included. Sample lengths were adjusted to 16 mm and root canal preparations were performed with K3 instruments up to 30/.04 size. MTA Fillapex®root canal sealer and gutta percha were used to obturate the canals with cold lateral condensation technique. The teeth were stored for 1 week at 37 ºC in 100% relative humidity. Specimens were randomly assigned into three groups (n:15): G1: Resosolv, G2: Endosolv E and G3: Guttasolv. 35/.04 K3 instruments were used as the final retreatment instruments. Final irrigation was performed and root canals were dried. The teeth were split along their long axis and operating microscope at 10x magnification was used to evaluate the amount of remaining root filling material. Samples were then scored. SEM and EDS analysis were used to enhance the accuracy of evaluations. Data were subjected to statistical interpretation using Kruskal-Wallis test at a 95% confidence level (p0.05). Intra group comparisons showed that apical, middle and coronal thirds of each group showed no significant differences among themselves (p>0.05). Conclusion: Root fillings performed with MTA Fillapex® and gutta percha could be retreated with the solvents used in the study.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, MTA Fillapex kök kanal patı ve güta-perka-ile yapılmış kanal dolgularının uzaklaştırılmasında farklı geleneksel solventlerin etkinliğini değerlendirmekti. Gereç ve Yöntem: 45 maksiller santral kesici insan dişi çalışmaya dahil edildi. Örneklerin boyları 16 mm'ye ayarlandı ve kök kanal preparasyonları K3 enstrümanlarıyla 30/.04 boyuta ulaşılıncaya kadar yapıldı. Kök kanallarının doldurulması, soğuk lateral kondensasyon tekniği kullanılarak MTA Fillapex kök kanal patı ve güta perkaile gerçekleştirildi. Dişler 1 hafta süresince 37 ºC'de ve %100 nemli ortamda saklandı. Örnekler rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n:15): G1: Resosolv G2: Endosolv E G3: Guttasolv. 35/.04 K3 enstrümanları son retreatment enstrümanları olarak kullanıldı. Son irrigasyon ve kurulama yapıldı. Dişler uzun eksenleri boyunca ikiye ayrıldı ve artık kök kanal dolgu maddesi operasyon mikroskobuyla 10X büyütmede incelendi. Örnekler skorlandı. Değerlendirmenin doğruluğunu arttırmak amacıyla SEM ve EDS analizleri yapıldı. %95 güven seviyesinde (p0.05). Grupların kendi içinde apikal, orta ve koronal üçlülerinin karşılaştırmasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı farklılık yoktu (p>0.05). Sonuç: MTA Fillapex ve gutta-perka ile yapılan kanal dolgularının yeniden kanal tedavisinde bu çalışmada kullanılan solventler kullanılabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, T., ÜSTÜN, Y., SAĞSEN, B. (2022). RETREATMENT OF ROOT CANAL FILLINGS PERFORMED WITH A CALCIUM SILICATE BASED ROOT CANAL SEALER AND GUTTA-PERCHA WITH DIFFERENT ROOT CANAL SOLVENTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 219–225. https://ajindex.com/articles/452287

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Friedman S. Expected outcomes in the prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. In: Orstavik D, Ford TP, editors. Essential endodontology: Prevention and treatment of apical periodontitis. Oxford: Blackwell Munksgaard; 2007. 432
  2. Siqueira JF Jr. Aetiology of root canal treatment failure: why well-treated teeth can fail. Int Endod J 2001;34:1-10. 3. de Chevigny C, Dao TT, Basrani BR, Marquis V, Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study-- phases 3 and 4: orthograde retreatment. J Endod 2008;34:131-7
  3. Barletta FB, de Sousa Reis M, Wagner M, Borges JC, Dall'Agnol C. Computed tomography assessment of three techniques for removal of filling material. Aust Endod J 2008;34:101-5
  4. Sjogren U, Hagglund B, Sundqvist G, Wing K. Factors affecting the long-term results of endodontic treatment. J Endod 1990;16:498-504
  5. Odesjo B, Hellden L, Salonen L, Langeland K. Prevalence of previous endodontic treatment, technical standard and occurrence of periapical lesions in a randomly selected adult, general population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:265-72
  6. Hulsmann M, Bluhm V. Efficacy, cleaning ability and safety of different rotary NiTi instruments in root canal retreatment. Int Endod J 2004;37:468- 76
  7. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Meyer KM, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Efficacy of different rotary instruments for gutta-percha removal in root canal retreatment. J Endod 2006;32:469-72
  8. Tasdemir T, Yildirim T, Celik D. Comparative study of removal of current endodontic fillings. J Endod 2008;34:326-9
  9. Viducic D, Jukic S, Karlovic Z, Bozic Z, Miletic I, Anic I. Removal of gutta-percha from root canals using an Nd:YAG laser. Int Endod J 2003;36:670- 3
  10. Krell KV, Neo J. The use of ultrasonic endodontic instrumentation in the re-treatment of a pastefilled endodontic tooth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985;60:100-2
  11. Friedman S, Mor C. The success of endodontic therapy--healing and functionality. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32:493-503
  12. Friedman S, Moshonov J, Trope M. Efficacy of removing glass ionomer cement, zinc oxide eugenol, and epoxy resin sealers from retreated root canals. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992;73:609-12
  13. Schirrmeister JF, Wrbas KT, Schneider FH, Altenburger MJ, Hellwig E. Effectiveness of a hand file and three nickel-titanium rotary instruments for removing gutta-percha in curved root canals during retreatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2006;101:542-7.