Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

EFFECT OF SEPARATED ROTARY INSTRUMENTS ON THE APICAL MICROLEAKAGE OF ROOT CANAL FILLINGS

KÖK KANALINDA KIRILMIŞ DÖNER ALETLERİN KÖK KANALININ APİKAL MIKROSIZINTISI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
246–251
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Separation of rotary NiTi instruments in the root canals negatively affected the apical seal of the root canal fillings, regardless of the instrument type.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of separated fragments from two different nickel titanium rotary instruments on microleakage of the root canal filling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1 and Group 3 (the control group) were shaped with ProTaper® rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files; Group 2 was shaped with Revo-S® rotary files.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Separation of rotary NiTi instruments in the root canals negatively affected the apical seal of the root canal fillings, regardless of the instrument type.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of separated fragments from two different nickel titanium rotary instruments on microleakage of the root canal filling. Material and method: Extracted anterior teeth with single canal and straight roots were used. The teeth were divided into three groups. Group 1 and Group 3 (the control group) were shaped with ProTaper® rotary nickel-titanium (NiTi) files; Group 2 was shaped with Revo-S® rotary files. In Group 1, ProTaper® F3 files and in Group 2, Revo-S® 30/06 files, were broken in the apical one-third part of the root canals. All canals were obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus sealer. After immersion in basic fuchsine stain solutions for 48 h, the roots were longitudinally sectioned. Digital photographs of the root sections were evaluated with image analysis software. Statistical analyses were performed with one way ANOVA and Tamhane test. Results: Microleakage of the control group was significantly less than Group 1 and Group 2. However, there was no statistically significant difference between the microleakage values of the groups separated ProTaper® or Revo-S® instruments. Conclusion: Separation of rotary NiTi instruments in the root canals negatively affected the apical seal of the root canal fillings, regardless of the instrument type.

Özet

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı kök kanalının apikal üçlü bölgesinde kırılmış iki farklı tipteki nikel titanyum döner aletin kök kanal dolgusunun apikal mikrosızıntısı üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Materyal ve metot: Bu çalışmada çekilmiş üst çene ön dişler kullanıldı. Kronlar uzaklaştırıldıktan sonra dişler rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı (n=12). Kontrol grubu (Grup 3) ve Grup 1 ProTaper döner aletleri ile, Grup 2 Revo-S döner aletler ile şekillendirildi. Grup 1'de Protaper F3, Grup 2'de Revo-S 30/06 döner alet kök kanalının apikal üçlü bölgesinde kırıldı. Bütün dişler lateral kondensasyon tekniği ile AH Plus ve guta-perka kullanılarak dolduruldu. 48 saat bazik fuksin solüsyonunda bekletildikten sonra dişler uzunlamasına iki eşit parçaya bölündü. Doğrusal mikrosızıntı ölçümü için kök kesitlerinin dijital fotoğrafları imaj analiz yazılımı analizler tek yönlü ANOVA ve Tamhane testleri ile yapıldı. Bulgular: Kontrol grubunun mikrosızıntısı kırık alet olan gruplardan anlamlı şekilde azdı. Ancak, kanal içinde ProTaper ve Revo-S eğeleri kırılan gruplar arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark yoktu (p=0,992). Sonuç: Döner NiTi kök kanal eğelerinin kök kanalı içerisinde kırılması kök kanal dolgusunun apikal mikrosızıntısını kanal eğesinin tipinden bağımsız olarak olumsuz şekilde etkiledi.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERTAŞ, H., OK, E., UYSAL, B. (2022). EFFECT OF SEPARATED ROTARY INSTRUMENTS ON THE APICAL MICROLEAKAGE OF ROOT CANAL FILLINGS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 246–251. https://ajindex.com/articles/452276

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Hubscher W, Barbakow F, Peters OA. Root-canal preparation with FlexMaster: canal shapes analysed by micro-computed tomography. Int Endod J 2003;36:740-7
  2. Ruddle CJ. Nonsurgical endodontic retreatment. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004;32:474-84
  3. Iqbal MK, Kohli MR, Kim JS. A retrospective clinical study of incidence of root canal instrument separation in an endodontics graduate program: a PennEndo database study. J Endod 2006;32:1048- 52
  4. Parashos P, Messer HH. Rotary NiTi instrument fracture and its consequences. J Endod 2006;32:1031-43
  5. Al-Fouzan KS. Incidence of rotary ProFile instrument fracture and the potential for bypassing in vivo. Int Endod J 2003;36:864-7
  6. Spili P, Parashos P, Messer HH. The impact of instrument fracture on outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod 2005;31:845-50
  7. Alapati SB, Brantley WA, Svec TA, et al. SEM observations of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments that fractured during clinical use. J Endod 2005;31:40-3
  8. Wu J, Lei G, Yan M, et al. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy. J Endod 2011;37:758-63
  9. Souter NJ, Messer HH. Complications associated with fractured file removal using an ultrasonic technique. J Endod 2005;31:450-2
  10. Ward JR, Parashos P, Messer HH. Evaluation of an ultrasonic technique to remove fractured rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments from root canals: an experimental study. J Endod 2003; 29:756-63
  11. Suter B, Lussi A, Sequeira P. Probability of removing fractured instruments from root canals. Int Endod J 2005;38:112-23
  12. Ingle JI, Glick D. The Washington study. In: Ingle JI, editor. Endodontics. 1 ed. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger; 1965.54 13. Crump MC, Natkin E. Relationship of broken root canal instruments to endodontic case prognosis: a clinical investigation. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;80:1341-7
  13. Madarati AA, Watts DC, Qualtrough AJ. Opinions and attitudes of endodontists and general dental practitioners in the UK towards the intracanal fracture of endodontic instruments: part 1. Int Endod J 2008;41:693-701
  14. Lin LM, Rosenberg PA, Lin J. Do procedural errors cause endodontic treatment failure? J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:187-93; quiz 231
  15. Hulsmann M, Schinkel I. Influence of several factors on the success or failure of removal of fractured instruments from the root canal. Endod Dent Traumato. 1999;15:252-8
  16. Peters OA, Peters CI, Schonenberger K, Barbakow F. ProTaper rotary root canal prepar