SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Our anesthesia experıences of sedoanalgesia for minor dental surgery approaches

Sedoanaljezi altında minör dental cerrahi girişimlerde anestezi deneyimlerimiz

Ayşe Hande ARPACI
Poyzan BOZKURT
Pages
1–6
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Noother side effects or complications were observed.Conclusion: When OAA/S:3 level is achieved in MACwith intravenous anesthetics, minor surgery attempts(tooth extractions) ca n be trustfully carried out.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: The majority of dental practice isimplemented under local anesthesia and do notrequire monitorization of systemic functions.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study wepresent and evaluate data obtained by MonitoredAnesthesia Care (MAC) of patients who couldn t beadministered local anesthesia, instead been appliedsedoanalgesia.Material and Method:Data of 621 patientsbetween the age of 1 -75 years who administered toAnkara University Faculty of Dentistry Department ofOral and Maxillofacial Surgery operating room , duringone year for minor surg ery attempts (tooth extraction)under Sedoanalgesia with MAC were examined.Intraoperative and postoperative side effects as wellas parameters recorded on the anesthesia forms wereevaluated.Result: As result of evaluations; in all patients agedbetween 1 -75, minor surgery attempts (toothextraction) were carried out under MAC whichObserver Assessment of the Alertness/Sedation Scale(OAA/S): 3 level was aimed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Noother side effects or complications were observed.Conclusion: When OAA/S:3 level is achieved in MACwith intravenous anesthetics, minor surgery attempts(tooth extractions) ca n be trustfully carried out.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: The majority of dental practice isimplemented under local anesthesia and do notrequire monitorization of systemic functions. Howeverit is crucial to monitor the patient and applyappropriate treatment when dental care isaccompanied by health problems. In this study wepresent and evaluate data obtained by MonitoredAnesthesia Care (MAC) of patients who couldn t beadministered local anesthesia, instead been appliedsedoanalgesia.Material and Method:Data of 621 patientsbetween the age of 1 -75 years who administered toAnkara University Faculty of Dentistry Department ofOral and Maxillofacial Surgery operating room , duringone year for minor surg ery attempts (tooth extraction)under Sedoanalgesia with MAC were examined.Intraoperative and postoperative side effects as wellas parameters recorded on the anesthesia forms wereevaluated.Result: As result of evaluations; in all patients agedbetween 1 -75, minor surgery attempts (toothextraction) were carried out under MAC whichObserver Assessment of the Alertness/Sedation Scale(OAA/S): 3 level was aimed. Intraoperatively rashesoccurred in %4, nausea was observed in %3.2 of allpatients. Postoperatively nausea was observed in%6.4, vomitus was seen in %7.2 of all patients. Noother side effects or complications were observed.Conclusion: When OAA/S:3 level is achieved in MACwith intravenous anesthetics, minor surgery attempts(tooth extractions) ca n be trustfully carried out.

Özet

Giriş ve Amaç: Dental uygulamaların önemli bir kısmılokal anestezi altında gerçekleştirilmekte, sistemikfonksiyonların monitörizasyonu gerekmemektedir.Ancak dental tedaviye eşlik eden sağlık sorunlarıvarlığında yakın monitörizasyon ve uygun tedavilerinyapılması zorunludur. Bu araştırmada; dental tedavilerilokal anestezi altında gerçekleştirilemeyen olgularınsedoanaljezi altında Moni törize Anestezi Bakımı (MAB) uygulamalarına ait verileri değerlendirilerek sonuçlarısunulmuştur.Gereç ve Yöntem: Ankara Üniversitesi Diş HekimliğiFakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Cerrahisi GenelAmeliyathanesinde bir yıl süresince sedoanaljezialtında MAB ile minör cerrahi girişim (diş çekimi)gerçekleştirilen 1 -75 yaş arası 621 olguya ait kayıtlarincelendi. Anestezi formlarında kayıt altına alınanparametreler yanı sıra, işlem sırasında ve sonrasındagözlemlenen yan etkiler de değerlendirildi.Bulgular: Değerlendirme sonucunda; 1 - 75 yaş arasıtüm olgularda Gözlemcinin Uyanıklık/SedasyonDeğerlendirme Skalası (OAA/S):3 düzeyi hedeflenerekuygulanan sedoanaljezi altında MAB ile minör cerrahigirişim (diş çekimi) başarı ile gerçekleştirildi. İşlemsırasında %4 olguda döküntü, %3.2 olguda bulantı,işlem sonrası nda %6.4 olguda bulantı, %7.2 olgudakusma saptandı .Sonuç: İntravenöz anestezikler ile MABda OAA/S:3düzeyi sağlandığında minör cerrahi girişimlerin (dişçekimi) güvenle gerçekleştirilebileceği kanısı ndayız .

🔖

Cite This Article

ARPACI, A. H., BOZKURT, P. (2022). Our anesthesia experıences of sedoanalgesia for minor dental surgery approaches. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 1–6. https://ajindex.com/articles/452124

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akarslan ZZ, Erten H. Diş hekimliği korkusu ve kaygısı. Hacettepe Diş Hek Fak Derg 2009; 33: 62- 8
  2. Beringer RM, Segar P, Pearson A, Greamspet M, Kilpatrick N. Observational stu dy of perioperative behavior changes in children having teeth extracted under general anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth 2014; 24: 499- 5 04
  3. Ogle OE, Hertz MB. Anxiety control in the dental patient. Dent Clin North Am 2012; 56: 1 -16
  4. Schniering CA, Hudson JL, Rapee RM. Issu es in the diagnosis and assessment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. Clin Psychol Rev 2000; 20: 453 -78
  5. Birch BR, Anson KM, Miller RA. Sedoanalgesia in urology: a safe, cost-effective alternative to general anaesthesia. A review of 1020 cases Br J Urol 1990; 66: 342- 50
  6. Morgan GE, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ, Larson CP: Clinical Anesthesiology. 3rd (ed), Mc Graw Hill, New York 2002. p.882-8
  7. White PF, Fre ire AR: Ambulatory (Outpatient) anesthesia: Anesthesia. 6th ed Miller RD (ed). Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia 2005. p. 2589- 637
  8. ASA. Position on monitored anesthesia care (Approved by the ASA House of House of Delegates on October 21, 1986,and last amended on October 25, 2005). Available from URL: http://www.asahq.org/ publicationsAnd Services/ standards/23.pdf 9. Novak LC. ASA updates its position on monitored anesthesia ca re. ASA Newsletter 62: 12, 1998. Available from URL: www.asahq.org/Newsletters/ 1998/12 _98/ASAupdates_1298.html 10. Cavaliere F, Antonelli M, Arcangeli A, Conti G, Costa R, Pen nisi MA, Proietti R. A low - dose remifentanil infusion is well tolerated for sedation in mechanically ventilated, critically -ill patients. Can J Anesth 2002; 49: 1088- 94
  9. Glass PS, Bloom M, Kearse L, Rosow C, Sebel P, Manberg P. Bispectral analysis measures sedation and memory effects of propofol, midazolam, isoflurane, and alfentanil in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology 1997; 86: 836-47
  10. Nicolas E, Collado V, Faulks D, Bullier B, Hennequin M. A national cross- sectional survey of dental anxiety in the Frenc h adult population. BMC Oral Health 2007; 7: 12
  11. Gisler V, Bassetti R, Mericske - Stern R, Bayer S, Enkling N. A crosssectional analysis of the prevalence of dental anxiety and its relation to the oral health - related quality of life in patients with dental treatment needs at a university clinic in Switzerland. Gerodontology 2012; 29: 290-6
  12. Ünlü G, Gülsün B. Pediatrik Diş Hekimliğinde Sedasyon. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1996; 6: 108-14