Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Türkiye nin kuzey doğu populasyonunda pulpa taşlarının değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of pulp stones in a subpopulation of northeast Turkey

Pages
29–34
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Pearson s ch i -squared and Fisher s exacttests were used for difference comparisons (P

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim : To evaluate the prevalence and distribu - tion ofpulp stones in posterior teeth by u sing digitalpanoramic radiographs in a Turki sh subpopulation.Materials and method : Panoramic radiographs of3,113 patients ranging in age from 15 to 35 (1,836females and 1,277 males) were retrospectivelyexamined to determine the prevalence and distributionof the pulp stones.
📊
Key Findings & Data:All data were obtain ed from dentalrecords.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Pearson s ch i -squared and Fisher s exacttests were used for difference comparisons (P
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim : To evaluate the prevalence and distribu - tion ofpulp stones in posterior teeth by u sing digitalpanoramic radiographs in a Turki sh subpopulation.Materials and method : Panoramic radiographs of3,113 patients ranging in age from 15 to 35 (1,836females and 1,277 males) were retrospectivelyexamined to determine the prevalence and distributionof the pulp stones. All data were obtain ed from dentalrecords. All posterior teeth were investigated exceptthird molars, and the d ata obtained were recorded aspresent or absent according to genders in both arches,in the left and right side according to tooth type inboth arches. Pearson s ch i -squared and Fisher s exacttests were used for difference comparisons (P

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalıĢmanın amacı bir Türk populasyonundadijital panoramik radyografiler kullanarak arka grupdiĢlerde pulpa taĢlarının sıklık ve dağılımınıdeğerlendirmekti.Gereç ve Yöntemler: YaĢları 15 ile 35 arasındadeğiĢen 3113 hastanın panoramik radyografileri pulpataĢlarının sıklık ve dağılımını belirlemek için retrospektifolarak incelendi. Tüm veriler hastalara ait kayıtlardanelde edildi. Üçüncü büyük azı diĢleri dıĢındaki tüm azıdiĢleri incelendi. Elde edilen veriler her iki arktacinsiyetlere göre kayd edildi ve ayrıca her iki çenede diĢtipine göre sağ ve sol tarafta var ya da yok olarakkaydedildi. Pearson ki -kare ve Fisher exact testiistatistiksel farklılığı karĢılaĢtırmak için kullanıldı(P

🔖

Cite This Article

KARADAŞ, M., HATİPOĞLU, Ö., DEMİRBUĞA, S., AKDAĞ, M. S. (2022). Türkiye nin kuzey doğu populasyonunda pulpa taşlarının değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 29–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/452122

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Colak H, Celebi AA, Hamidi MM, Bayraktar Y, Colak T, Uzgur R. Assessment of the prevalence of pulp stones in a sample of Turkish Central Anatolian population. ScientificWorldJournal 2012;3:1 -7
  2. Goga R, Chandler NP, Oginni AO. Pulp stones: a review. Int Endod J 2008;41:457- 68
  3. White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiolog y Principles and Interpretation. 6 th ed. St Lous; Mosby: 2009. p. 310-3 65
  4. Gulsahi A, Cebeci AI, Ozden S. A radiographic assessment of th e prevalence of pulp stones in a group of Turkish dental patients. Int Endod J 2009;42:735 -9
  5. Moss -Salentijn L, Klyvert MH. Epithelially induced denticles in the pulps of recently erupted, noncarious human premolars. J Endod 1983;9:554- 60
  6. Hillmann G, Geur tsen W. Light-microscopical investigation of the distribution of extracellular matrix molecules and calcifications in human dental pulps of various ages. Cell Tissue Res 1997;289:145 - 54
  7. Sundell JR, Stanley HR, White CL. The relationship of coronal pulp stone formation to experimental operative procedures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1968;25:579- 89
  8. Stenvik A, Mjor IA. Epithelial remnants and denticle formation in the human dental pulp. Acta Odontol Scand 1970;28:72-8
  9. Siskos GJ, Georgopoulou M. Unusual case of general pulp calcification (pulp stones) in a young Greek girl. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990;6:282- 4
  10. VanDenBerghe JM, Panther B, Gound TG. Pulp stones throughout the dentition of monozygotic twins: a case report. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:749- 51
  11. Ranjitkar S, Taylor JA, Townsend GC. A radiographic assessment of the prevalence of pulp stones in Australians. Aust Dent J 2002;47:36-40
  12. Tomczyk J, Komarnitki J, Zalewska M, Wisniewska E, Szopinski K, Olczyk-Kowalczyk D. The prevalence of pulp stones in historical populations from the middle euphrates valley (Syria). Am J Phys Anthropol 2014;153:103 -15
  13. Ibarrola JL, Knowles KI, Ludlow MO, McKinley IB, Jr. Factors affecting the negotiability of second mesiobuccal canals in maxil lary molars. J Endod 1997;23:236-8
  14. Seven N, Kırzıoğlu Z, Özkaral A. Dentin dysplasia, type II: report of case. Atatürk Univ DiĢ Hek Fak Derg 1998;8:77-80 15. Baghdady VS, Ghose LJ, Nahoom HY. Prevalence of pulp stones in a teenage Iraqi group. J Endod 1988;14:309-11. 16. al - Hadi Hamasha A, Darwazeh A. Prevalence of pulp stones in Jordanian adults. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998;86:730-2
  15. Satheeshkumar PS, Mohan MP, S