SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1

Effect of fiber reinforcement on the flexure strength of nanofilled-resin composite

Fiberle güçlendirmenin nanofil kompozitin eğme direncine etkisinin incelenmesi

Nesrin ERONAT
Ümit CANDAN
Murat TÜRKÜN
Pages
13–20
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Glass fiber -reinforced nanofilcomposite applied with flowable composite (Gr III)exhibited higher flexural strength values in comparisonto the other groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim : The purpose of this in vitro study was toinvestigate the effect of woven glass fiber layering onflexural strength of nanofil composite resin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: Sixty specimens wereprepared standard metallic mold (25x2x2 m m)prepared according to ISO 4049 for flexural strength.The specimens were divided into four groups (n: 15)as follows; Flowable (Filtek Flow) + nanofil composite(Filtek Supreme) (Gr I), nanofil composite (Gr II),Flowable +woven glass fiber (EverStick Net) + nanofilcomposite (Gr III), woven glass fiber + nanofilcomposite (Gr IV).The specimens were stored indistilled water at 370 C for 24 hour, thenevaluated withthree -point bending test using Universal TestingMachine.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Glass fiber -reinforced nanofilcomposite applied with flowable composite (Gr III)exhibited higher flexural strength values in comparisonto the other groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim : The purpose of this in vitro study was toinvestigate the effect of woven glass fiber layering onflexural strength of nanofil composite resin. Material and Method: Sixty specimens wereprepared standard metallic mold (25x2x2 m m)prepared according to ISO 4049 for flexural strength.The specimens were divided into four groups (n: 15)as follows; Flowable (Filtek Flow) + nanofil composite(Filtek Supreme) (Gr I), nanofil composite (Gr II),Flowable +woven glass fiber (EverStick Net) + nanofilcomposite (Gr III), woven glass fiber + nanofilcomposite (Gr IV).The specimens were stored indistilled water at 370 C for 24 hour, thenevaluated withthree -point bending test using Universal TestingMachine. Data were analysed using Kruskal l Wallis andMann Whitney U tests. Three samples from eachgroup were examined by SEM.Result : The mean flexural strength values of thegroups I, II, III and IV were 93.6±4, 85.5±6, 107±9and 101±5 respectively. Glass fiber -reinforced nanofilcomposite applied with flowable composite (Gr III)exhibited higher flexural strength values in comparisonto the other groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı; fiberlegüçlendirmenin, nanofil kompozit materyalinin eğmedirencine etkisinin araştırılmasıdır.Materyal ve Metod : Eğme direnci testi içinISO 4049 standartlarına uygun hazırlanan standart birmetal kalıp (2 ×2 ×25 mm) kullanılarak 60 örnek ha -zırlandı. Örnekler dört çalışma grubuna ayrıldı (n:15).Akışkan Kompozit (Filtek Flow)+ Nanofil Kompozit (Fil -te k Supreme) (Grup I), Nanofil Kompozit (Kontrol)(Grup II) , Akışkan Kompozit+ Örgü Ca m Fiber (Ever-Stick Net)+ Nanofil Kompozit (Grup III) , Örgü CamFiber+Nanofil Kompozit (Grup IV). Örnekler 24 saat370 C de distile suda bekletildi. Daha sonra UniversalTe st cihazı ile üç nokta eğilme testine tabi tutuldu.Veriler istatistiksel olarak Kruskall Vallis ve MannWhitney U testi kullanılarak analiz edildi. Her gruba aitüç örnek, taramalı elektron mikroskobunda (SEM)incelendi. Bulgular: Ortalama eğme direnci değerleri vestandart sapmaları Grup I, II, III ve IV de sırasıyla93.6±4, 85.5±6, 107±9 ve 101±5 bulundu. Diğergruplarla karşılaştırıldığında kontrol grubunun (Gr II)en düşük değere sahip olduğu belirlenirken en yüksekeğme direncinin akışkan kompozit i le beraber fiber uy -gulanan nanofil kompozit grubunda olduğu gözlendi(p

🔖

Cite This Article

ERONAT, N., CANDAN, Ü., TÜRKÜN, M. (2022). Effect of fiber reinforcement on the flexure strength of nanofilled-resin composite. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 1, 13–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/452103

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Manhart J, Chen HY, Hamm G, Hickel R. Review of the Survival of Direct and Indirect Restorations I n Posterior Te eth of the Permanent Dentition. Operative Dentistry 2004; 29:481 -508
  2. Ferracane JL. Resin Composite -State of the Art. Dental Materials 2011; 27: 29-38
  3. Beun S, Glorieux T, Devaux J, Vreven J, Leloup G. Characterization of Nanofilled Compared to Universal and M icrofilled Composites. Dental Materials 2007; 23: 51 -9
  4. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes HB. An Application of Nanotechnology in Advanced Dental M aterials. Journal of American Dental Association 2003; 134: 1382-90
  5. Chen MH. Update on Dental Nanocomposites. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 549-60
  6. Butterworth, C., Ellakwa, A.E, Shortall, A. Fibre - Reinforced Composites in Restorative Dentistry. Dent Update 2003; 30:300-8
  7. Freilich MA, Meiers JC, Duncan JP, Goldberg AJ. Fiber -Reinforced Composites in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago, Berlin, London, Tokyo; Quintessence Publishing Co, Inc: 2000. p. 9-22
  8. Aydın C, Yılmaz H, Korkmaz T, Atlı Y,Zan T. Değişik Kron Köprü Veneer M ateryallerinin Sertliklerinin İ ncelenmesi. Cumhuriyet Ün iv Diş Hek Fak Derg 1998;12:46-53
  9. Yılmaz H, Aydın C. Akrilik Rezi nlerin Güçlendirme Teknikleri. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2002;12:46-53
  10. Garoushi S, Lippo VJ, Tezvergil A, Vallittu PK. Load B earing Capacity of Fiber -Reinforced a nd Particulate Filler Composite Resin Combination. Journal of Dentistry 2006; 34:179- 84
  11. Pereira, CL, Demarco FF, Cenci MS, Osinaga PWR, Piovesan EM. Flexural Strength of Composites: Influence of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforcement and Type of Composite, Clin Oral Invest 2003;7:116-9
  12. Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Burstone CJ, Goldberg AJ. Developme nt and Clinical Applications of a L ight- Polymerized Fiber- Reinforced Composite. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:311 – 8
  13. Xu HHK, Quinn JB, Smith DT, Guiseppetti AA. Effect of Different Whiskers O n The Reinforcement of Dental Resin Composites. Dent Mater 2003; 19:3 59-67
  14. Kanie T, Arikawa H, Fuji K, Ban S. Mechanical Properties of Reinforced Denture Base Resin: The Effect of Position and The Number of Woven Glass Fibers. Dent Mater J 2002;21:261 -9
  15. Van Dijken JWV, Sunnegardh -Grönberg K. Fiber - Reinforced Packable Re sin Composites in Class II Cavities. Journal of Dentistry 2006;34: 763 -9
  16. Goldberg, AJ. Freilich MA. An Innovative Pre - I mpregnated Glass Fiber For Reinforcing Composites. Dent Clin North Am 1999;43:127-33
  17. Freilich MA, Karmaker AC, Bursto