SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

COMPARISON OF MARGINAL AND INTERNAL ADAPTATION OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN-COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING AND HEAT- PRESSED CERAMIC LAMINATE VENEERS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY

BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ TASARIM-BİLGİSAYAR DESTEKLİ ÜRETİM VE PRESLEME SİSTEMLERİYLE ÜRETİLEN PORSELEN LAMİNAT VENERLERİN KENAR VE İNTERNAL UYUMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI: İN-VİTRO ÇALIŞMA

Ayşe Gözde TÜRK
Ş Mert YÜCE
Pages
19–26
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Levene and independent samples t-test was used to identify the statistical difference among the groups (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptations of porcelain laminate veneers produced with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heat-pressed techniques.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A total of 40 porcelain laminate veneers were evaluated whether the marginal and internal adaptations are changed due to fabrication technique.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Levene and independent samples t-test was used to identify the statistical difference among the groups (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the marginal and internal adaptations of porcelain laminate veneers produced with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heat-pressed techniques. Material and Methods: A total of 40 porcelain laminate veneers were evaluated whether the marginal and internal adaptations are changed due to fabrication technique. The veneers were fabricated with Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacturing and Heatpressed techniques (n=20). The marginal and internal adaptations of veneers were measured by using a replica technique. Replicas of each veneer were obtained by using a light-body silicone impression material. The replicas were sectioned mesio-distally and gingivoincisally. Then the marginal and internal gap adaptation of each cross section were measured by a stereomicroscope at x40 magnification. Nine measurement locations for internal, 3 measurement locations for marginal adaptation were used to obtain the mean values. Levene and independent samples t-test was used to identify the statistical difference among the groups (p

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmanın amacı, Bilgisayar destekli tasarımBilgisayar destekli üretim ve Isı ile Presleme yöntemleriyle üretilmiş porselen laminat venerlerin kenar ve iç yüzey uyumlarının karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve yöntem: Kenar ve iç yüzey uyumlarının fabrikasyon tekniğine göre farklılık gösterip göstermediğini belirlemek amacıyla toplam 40 adet porselen laminat vener değerlendirildi. Venerler, Bilgisayar destekli tasarım-Bilgisayar destekli üretim ve Isı ile Presleme yöntemleriyle üretildi (n=20). Kenar ve iç yüzey uyumları replika tekniği kullanılarak değerlendirildi. Her bir venerin replikası akışkan kıvamlı elastomerik ölçü materyali kulanılarak alındı ve replikalar, meziyo-distal ve insizo-gingival yönde kesildi. Her bir kesitin iç yüzey ve kenar uyumları ışık mikroskobunda x40 büyütme kullanılarak ölçüldü. İç yüzey uyumu için 9 nokta, kenar uyum içinse 3 nokta ölçüldü ve ortalamaları alındı. Levene ve independent samples t testi kullanılarak istatistiksel analiz yapıldı (p

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRK, A. G., YÜCE, Ş. M. (2022). COMPARISON OF MARGINAL AND INTERNAL ADAPTATION OF COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN-COMPUTER AIDED MANUFACTURING AND HEAT- PRESSED CERAMIC LAMINATE VENEERS: AN IN-VITRO STUDY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 19–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/452087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Peumans M, Van Meerbeek B, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Porcelain veneers: a review of the literature. J Dent 2000;28:163–77
  2. Nalbant DA, Ömeroğlu N. Farklı porselen laminate veneer yapım yöntemlerinin mikrosızıntı yönünden karşılaştırılmalı olarak değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv. Diş Hek. Fak. Derg 2001;11:5-12
  3. Sadowsky SJ. An overview of treatment considerations for esthetic restorations: a review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:433-42
  4. Oztürk E, Bolay S. Survival of porcelain laminate veneers with different degrees of dentin exposure: 2-year clinical results. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:481-9
  5. Taskonak B, Anusavice K, Mecholsky J. Role of investment interaction layer on strength and toughness of ceramic laminates. Dent Mater 2004;20:701–8
  6. Aboushelib MN, Elmahy WA, Ghazy MH. Internal adaptation, marginal accuracy and microleakage of a pressable versus a machinable ceramic laminate veneers. J Dent 2012;40:670-7
  7. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, Qian F. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:304-9
  8. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crownsvalidation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehab 2008;35:116-22
  9. Sulaiman F, Chai J, Jameson LM, Wozniak WT. A comparison of the marginal fit of In-Ceram, IPS Empress and procera crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:478-84
  10. Gemalmaz D, Çelik Ç. Comparison of marginal integrity of ceramic and composite veneer restorations luted with two different resin agents: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:59-64
  11. Giannetopoulos S, Van Noort R, Tsitrou E. Evaluation of the marginal integrity of ceramic copings with different marginal angles using two different CAD/CAM systems. J Dent 2010;38:980-6