Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED TWO SURFACE CLASS II RESIN NANO CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS

CAD/CAM SİSTEMİYLE HAZIRLANAN İKİ YÜZLÜ SINIF 2 NANO SERAMİK REZİN İNLEY RESTORASYONLARIN BİR YILLIK KLİNİK PERFORMANSININ DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
79–87
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin nano ceramic inlay restorations was found successful according to FDI criteria after 1 year.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single centre clinical trial was to evaluate the one year clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin nano-ceramic inlay restorations in two surface class II cavities in comparison with direct posterior composite restorations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty 2-surface (MO/OD) carious lesions or old restorations that needed to be replaced were included and randomly assigned into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin nano ceramic inlay restorations was found successful according to FDI criteria after 1 year.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this randomized, controlled, single centre clinical trial was to evaluate the one year clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin nano-ceramic inlay restorations in two surface class II cavities in comparison with direct posterior composite restorations. Materials and Methods: One hundred and twenty 2-surface (MO/OD) carious lesions or old restorations that needed to be replaced were included and randomly assigned into two groups. The restorations in experimental group were fabricated by a CAD/CAM system with resin nano ceramic blocks (Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE, USA), while a posterior nanohybrid composite resin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Kuraray, Japan) was used for direct posterior composite restorations in control group with a three-step etch & rinse dentin adhesive system (Optibond FL, Kerr, USA). All tested restorative materials were used according to the manufacturers' instructions. Clinical evaluation was performed after 1 week, 6 months and 1 year according to the FDI criteria. The data were analysed using Friedman's ANOVA and Mann-Whitney U tests (? = 0.05). Results: After 1 year, all restorations were clinically acceptable with no need for clinical attempt. Considering all criteria, the differences between two groups were not statistically significant. Only surface lustre of direct composite restorations significantly reduced to score 2 after 1 year (p =0.046). Conclusion: The clinical performance of CAD/CAM fabricated resin nano ceramic inlay restorations was found successful according to FDI criteria after 1 year.

Özet

Amaç: Bu randomize, kontrollü ve tek merkezli klinik çalışmanın amacı, CAD/CAM sistemiyle hazırlanan iki yüzlü sınıf 2 nano seramik rezin inley restorasyonların 1 yıllık klinik performansını direkt kompozit rezin restorasyonlarla karşılaştırmaktır. Gereç ve Yöntem: İki yüzlü (MO veya OD) çürük lezyonu veya değiştirilmesi gereken eski restorasyona sahip 120 adet diş çalışmaya dahil edildi ve rastgele iki gruba ayrıldı. Deney grubundaki restorasyonlar CAD/CAM sistemi kullanılarak nano seramik rezin bloklar (Lava Ultimate, 3M ESPE, ABD) ile üretilirken, kontrol restorasyonlar için üç aşamalı etch-and-rinse dentin adeziv sistemiyle (Optibond FL, Kerr, ABD) birlikte posterior nanohibrit bir kompozit rezin (Clearfil Majesty Posterior, Kuraray, Japonya) kullanıldı. Test edilen tüm restoratif materyaller üretici firmaların önerileri doğrultusunda uygulandı. Klinik değerlendirmeler 1. haftada, 6. ayda ve 1. yılda FDI kriterleri kullanılarak yapıldı. Veriler Friedman's ANOVA ve Mann-Whitney U testleri ile analiz edildi (? = 0.05). Bulgular: Birinci yılın sonunda tüm restorasyonlar ideal veya klinik girişim gerektirmeyen kabul edilebilir klinik performans gösterdi. Tüm kriterlerde iki grup arasında istatistiksel olarak herhangi bir fark gözlenmedi. Sadece 1. yılda direkt kompozit rezin restorasyonların yüzey parlaklığında 2 skoruna doğru anlamlı bir azalma görüldü (p =0,046). Sonuç: CAD/CAM sistemiyle hazırlanan nano seramik rezin inley restorasyonların 1 yıllık klinik performansı FDI kriterlerine göre başarılı bulunmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, E. U., YAŞA, B. (2022). EVALUATION OF THE CLINICAL PERFORMANCE OF CAD/CAM FABRICATED TWO SURFACE CLASS II RESIN NANO CERAMIC INLAY RESTORATIONS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 79–87. https://ajindex.com/articles/452085

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Keshvad A, Hooshmand T, Asefzadeh F, Khalilinejad F, Alihemmati M, Van Noort R. Marginal gap, internal fit and fracture load of leucite-reinforced ceramic inlays fabricated by CEREC inLab and hot-pressed techniques. J Prosthodont 2011;20:535-40
  2. Öztürk Ö. Seramik inley restorasyonlar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2015;10:118-24
  3. Şahin E, Aktaş DG, Özcan DN, Aydın DDH, Akça K. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde CAD/CAM klinik uygulamalar: Sirona CEREC sistemi. Hacettepe Dis Hek Fak Derg 2009;33:34-40
  4. Fasbinder DJ. Clinical performance of chairside CAD/CAM restorations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:22S-31S
  5. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz N. Clinical performance of CEREC ceramic inlays: a systematic review. Dent Mater 1999;15:54-61
  6. Brauner AW, Bieniek KW. Seven years of clinical experience with the CEREC inlay system. CAD/CAM in aesthetic dentistry: CEREC. 1996;10:217-228
  7. Chabouis HF, Faugeron VS, Attal J-P. Clinical efficacy of composite versus ceramic inlays and onlays: A systematic review. Dent Mater 2013;29:1209-18
  8. Koller M, Arnetzl G, Holly L, Arnetzl G. Lava ultimate resin nano ceramic for CAD/CAM: customization case study. Int J Comput Dent 2011; 15:159-64
  9. Fleming M. In-office milling: maximizing aesthetics and efficiency. Dent Today 2012;31:140-2. 10. https://www.e-calib.info/ Erişim: 23.08.2016
  10. Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg. 2014;6:103-9
  11. Hickel R, Peschke A, Tyas M, Mjör I, Bayne S, Peters M, Hiller KA, Randall R, Vanherle G, Heintze SD. FDI World Dental Federation - Clinical Criteria for the Evaluation of Direct and Indirect Restorations. Update and Clinical Examples. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:259-72
  12. Hickel R, Dasch W, Mehl A, Kremers L. CAD/CAM- Fillings of the future? Int Dent J 1997;47:247-58
  13. Mehl A, Hickel R. A new optical 3D-scanning system for CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 1999;2:129-36
  14. Alt V, Hannig M, Wöstmann B, Balkenhol M. Fracture strength of temporary fixed partial dentures: CAD/CAM versus directly fabricated restorations. Dent Mater 2011;27:339-47
  15. Stawarczyk B, Ender A, Trottmann A, Özcan M, Fischer J, Hämmerle CH. Load-bearing capacity of CAD/CAM milled polymeric three-unit fixed dental prostheses: Effect of aging regimens. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:1669-77
  16. Stawarczyk B, Krawczuk A, Ilie N. Tensile bond strength of resin composite repair in vitro using different surface preparation conditionings to an aged CAD/CAM resin nanoceramic. Cl