SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2

COMPARING OF MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF THREE DIFFERENT SELF-ETCH ADHESIVE SYSTEMS TO PRIMARY TOOTH DENTINE CONTAMINATED WITH FERRIC SULPHATE

ÜÇ FARKLI SELF-ETCH ADEZİVİN DEMİR SÜLFAT İLE KONTAMİNE SÜT DİŞİ DENTİNİNE BAĞLANMA DAYANIMLARININ KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Gülsüm DURUK
Neslihan KAYA
Veli Alper GÖRGEN
Pages
67–72
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The lowest value of microtensile has been found in Group II (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strengths of compomer placed to primary dentin contaminated with ferric sulphate following the application of three different acidic and acid-free self-etch adhesive systems.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and method: 45 non-carious second primary molars human teeth were cut horizontally so as to be released the occlusal dentin surface.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The lowest value of microtensile has been found in Group II (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strengths of compomer placed to primary dentin contaminated with ferric sulphate following the application of three different acidic and acid-free self-etch adhesive systems. Materials and method: 45 non-carious second primary molars human teeth were cut horizontally so as to be released the occlusal dentin surface. Teeth were randomly divided into 3 groups with equal numbers. Group I: control, Group II: contaminated with ferric sulphate, Group III: exposed to acid contaminated with ferric sulphate. Each group was divided into 3 subgroups for 3 different adhesive agents (Clearfil SE-Bond, 3MESPE Single Bond Universal, Tokuyama Bond ForceII). After the teeth were contaminated with human blood in group II and III, ferric sulphate was applied to teeth for 30 seconds and they were rinsed with physiological serum for 30 seconds. 34.5% phosphoric acid was applied to teeth in group 3 for 15 seconds. After the application of adhesive and compomer restoration to all groups, 3 test sticks from each tooth were obtained by cutting the teeth to 1x1mm. Microtensile test was applied to the strips and fracture types (adhesive, cohesive, mixed) obtained were determined at stereomicroscope. The data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Post-Hoc test. Results: The lowest value of microtensile has been found in Group II (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı demir sülfat ile kontamine süt dişi dentinine 3 farklı self-etch adeziv sistemlerin asitli ve asitsiz uygulamalarını takiben yerleştirilen kompomerin mikrogerilim bağlanma dayanımlarını değerlendirmektir. Materyal-Metod: 45 adet çürüksüz insan süt II. azı dişinin kuronları, okluzalden dentin yüzeyi açığa çıkacak şekilde yatay yönde uzaklaştırılmış ve eşit sayıda rastgele 3 gruba ayrılmıştır. Grup I: kontrol, Grup II: demir sülfatla kontamine, Grup III: demir sülfatla kontamine asit uygulanan grup. Her bir grup kendi içinde 3 farklı adeziv ajan (Clearfil SE-Bond, 3M-ESPE Single Bond Universal, Tokuyama Bond Force) için 3 alt gruba ayrılmıştır. Grup II ve III'teki dişler insan kanıyla kontamine edildikten sonra 30 sn demir sülfat uygulanmış ve 30 sn süreyle serum fizyolojik ile yıkanmıştır. Grup III'e %34,5' lik fosforik asit 15 sn uygulanmıştır. Tüm gruplara adeziv uygulaması ve kompomer restorasyonu sonrası, dişler 1x1 mm kalınlığında kesilerek her dişten 3'er adet test çubukları elde edilmiştir. Çubuklara mikrogerilim testi uygulanmıştır. Oluşan steromikroskopta değerlendirilmesinde tek yönlü varyans analizi ve Posthoc çoklu karşılaştırma testleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular: En düşük mikrogerilim değeri Grup II'de iken (p

🔖

Cite This Article

DURUK, G., KAYA, N., GÖRGEN, V. A. (2022). COMPARING OF MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF THREE DIFFERENT SELF-ETCH ADHESIVE SYSTEMS TO PRIMARY TOOTH DENTINE CONTAMINATED WITH FERRIC SULPHATE. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 2, 67–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/452084

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Prabhakar AR, Bedi S. Effect of glutaraldehyde and ferric sulfate on shear bond strength of adhesives to primary dentin. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2008;26:109-13
  2. Zarzar PA, Rosenblatt A, Takahashi CS, Takeuchi PL, Costa Junior LA. Formocresol mutagenicity following primary tooth pulp therapy: an in vivo study. J Dent 2003;31:479-85
  3. Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilute formocresol in pulpotomized primary molars: long-term follow up. Pediatr Dent 1997;19:327-30
  4. Salama FS. Influence of zinc-oxide eugenol, formocresol, and ferric sulfate on bond strength of dentin adhesives to primary teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005;6:14-21
  5. Shalan H, Awad S, El-Fallal AA. Influence of pulpotomy medicaments on the ultrastructure and shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive to primary tooth dentin. Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 517-23
  6. Inoue S, Koshiro K, Yoshida Y, et al. Hydrolytic stability of self-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res 2005;84:1160-4
  7. Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater 2008;24:90-101
  8. Peumans M, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Eight-year clinical evaluation of a 2-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective enamel etching. Dent Mater 2010;26:1176-84
  9. Perdigao J, Carmo AR, Anauate-Netto C, et al. Clinical performance of a self-etching adhesive at 18 months. Am J Dent. 2005;18:135-40
  10. Keleş S, Derelioğlu S, Çelik P, Yılmaz Y. Demir Sülfat ile Kontamine Süt Dişi Dentininde Farklı Yüzey Uygulamalarının Kompomerin MikroGerilimine Etkisi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2013; 2:159-64
  11. Kuphasuk W, Harnirattisai C, Senawongse P, Tagami J. Bond strengths of two adhesive systems to dentin contaminated with a hemostatic agent. Oper Dent 2007;32:399-405
  12. Land MF, Rosenstiel SF, Sandrik JL. Disturbance of the dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agents. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:4-7
  13. Christoffersen MR, Thyregod HC, Christoffersen J. Effects of aluminum(III), chromium(III), and iron(III) on the rate of dissolution of calcium hydroxyapatite crystals in the absence and presence of the chelating agent desferrioxamine. Calcif Tissue Int 1987;41:27-30
  14. Selvig KA, Halse A. The ultrastructural localization of iron in rat incisor enamel. Scand J Dent Res 1975;83:88-95
  15. Kumar P, Shenoy A, Joshi S. The effect of vario