SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

PREMOLAR ÇEKİMLERİ VEYA MİNİ VİDA DESTEKLİ İNTRÜZYON İLE TEDAVİ EDİLMİŞ ÖN AÇIK KAPANIŞLI HASTALARDA TEDAVİ SONUÇLARININ VE STABİLİTENİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

EVALUATION OF TREATMENT RESULTS AND STABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH ANTERIOR OPEN BITE TREATED BY PREMOLAR EXTRACTIONS OR MINI- IMPLANT ANCHORED INTRUSION

Işıl ARAS
Pages
147–153
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: At T2, SNB increased and SNGoGn decreased significantly in MG, with significant intergroup difference (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment results and stability of open bite treatment achieved via intrusion of posterior teeth and extraction of 1st premolars Material and Methods: This study was conducted on pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2) and follow-up (T3) cephalograms of 28 patients who received open bite treatment. 14 patients (mean age 14.61±0.87) were treated with the extraction of the 1st premolar (extraction group: EG) while 14 patients (mean age 15.06±1.05) had bite closure via intrusion of the posterior teeth using mini-implants (miniimplant group: MG).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean follow-up periods in EG and MG were 3.32±1.25 (range, 2.10-6.20) and 2.74±0.77 years (range, 2.05-4.34), respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: At T2, SNB increased and SNGoGn decreased significantly in MG, with significant intergroup difference (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the treatment results and stability of open bite treatment achieved via intrusion of posterior teeth and extraction of 1st premolars Material and Methods: This study was conducted on pretreatment (T1), posttreatment (T2) and follow-up (T3) cephalograms of 28 patients who received open bite treatment. 14 patients (mean age 14.61±0.87) were treated with the extraction of the 1st premolar (extraction group: EG) while 14 patients (mean age 15.06±1.05) had bite closure via intrusion of the posterior teeth using mini-implants (miniimplant group: MG). The mean follow-up periods in EG and MG were 3.32±1.25 (range, 2.10-6.20) and 2.74±0.77 years (range, 2.05-4.34), respectively. Results: At T2, SNB increased and SNGoGn decreased significantly in MG, with significant intergroup difference (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı 1. Premolar çekimi ve maksiller posterior dişlerin intrüzyonu ile gerçekleştirilen açık kapanış tedavilerinin sonuç ve stabilitesinin karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma açık kapanış tedavisi gören 28 hastanın tedavi öncesi (T1), tedavi sonrası (T2) ve takip (T3) sefalometrik röntgenleri üzerinde yürütüldü. 14 hastada (ortalama yaş 14.61±0.87) 1. Premolar çekimli konvensiyonel ortodontik tedavi uygulanırken, 14 hastanın (15.06±1.05) tedavisi posterior dişlerin intrüzyonu ile yapıldı. Çekim ve mini-implant gruplarında ortalama takip zamanları sırası ile 3.32±1.25 ve 2.74±0.77 yıldı. Bulgular: Tedavi sonunda mini-implant grubunda, SNB açısındaki artış ve SNGoGn açısındaki azalma önemli bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

ARAS, I. (2022). PREMOLAR ÇEKİMLERİ VEYA MİNİ VİDA DESTEKLİ İNTRÜZYON İLE TEDAVİ EDİLMİŞ ÖN AÇIK KAPANIŞLI HASTALARDA TEDAVİ SONUÇLARININ VE STABİLİTENİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 147–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/452071

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Zuroff JP, Chen SH, Shapiro PA, Little RM, Joondeph DR, Huang GJ. Orthodontic treatment of anterior open-bite malocclusion: stability 10 years postretention. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:302 e301-8
  2. Lopez-Gavito G, Wallen TR, Little RM, Joondeph DR. Anterior open-bite malocclusion: a longitudinal 10- year postretention evaluation of orthodontically treated patients. Am J Orthod 1985;87:175-86
  3. Katsaros C, Berg R. Anterior open bite malocclusion: a follow-up study of orthodontic treatment effects. Eur J Orthod 1993;15:273-80
  4. Baek MS, Choi YJ, Yu HS, Lee KJ, Kwak J, Park YC. Long-term stability of anterior open-bite treatment by intrusion of maxillary posterior teeth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:396 e391-9
  5. Greenlee GM, Huang GJ, Chen SS, Chen J, Koepsell T, Hujoel P. Stability of treatment for anterior open-bite malocclusion: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;139:154-69
  6. Kim YH, Han UK, Lim DD, Serraon ML. Stability of anterior openbite correction with multiloop edgewise archwire therapy: A cephalometric follow-up study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:43-54
  7. Remmers D, Van't Hullenaar RW, Bronkhorst EM, Berge SJ, Katsaros C. Treatment results and longterm stability of anterior open bite malocclusion. Orthod Craniofac Res 2008;11:32-42
  8. Chang YI, Moon SC. Cephalometric evaluation of the anterior open bite treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:29-38
  9. Janson G, Valarelli FP, Beltrao RT, de Freitas MR, Henriques JF. Stability of anterior open-bite extraction and nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;129:768-74
  10. Reitan K, Rygh P. Biomechanical principles and reactions. In: Graber TM, Vanarsdall RL, editors. Orthodontics--current principles and techniques. St Louis, M0: Mosby; 1994, p.168-69
  11. Janson G, Valarelli FP, Henriques JF, de Freitas MR, Cancado RH. Stability of anterior open bite nonextraction treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2003;124:265-76. 12. de Freitas MR, Beltrao RT, Janson G, Henriques JF, Cancado RH. Long-term stability of anterior open bite extraction treatment in the permanent dentition. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;125:78-87
  12. Kucera J, Marek I, Tycova H, Baccetti T. Molar height and dentoalveolar compensation in adult subjects with skeletal open bite. Angle Orthod 2011;81:564-9
  13. Scheffler NR, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Outcomes and stability in patie