Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3

THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS RETROCAVITY PREPARATION TECHNIQUES AND RETROFILLING WITH BIODENTINE ON APICAL MICROLEAKAGE

FARKLI RETROGRAD KAVİTE AÇMA TEKNİKLERİNİN VE RETROGRAD DOLGU BİODENTİNİN APİKAL SIZINTI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Pages
139–146
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However; there were statistical significant differences between apicoectomy and apicoectomy+Nd:YAG laser group (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical microleakage of root-end cavities prepared by Er:YAG (400 mJ, 10 Hz) or Nd:YAG (150 mJ, 10 Hz) laser and the effect of Biodentine by using dye penetration method.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Decoronated sixty-four extracted single-rooted human teeth were prepared using ProTaper® up to F4 and obturated by lateral condensation technique with Guta-perka ve AH plus.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However; there were statistical significant differences between apicoectomy and apicoectomy+Nd:YAG laser group (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the apical microleakage of root-end cavities prepared by Er:YAG (400 mJ, 10 Hz) or Nd:YAG (150 mJ, 10 Hz) laser and the effect of Biodentine by using dye penetration method. Material and Methods: Decoronated sixty-four extracted single-rooted human teeth were prepared using ProTaper® up to F4 and obturated by lateral condensation technique with Guta-perka ve AH plus. The 3-mm of 90° apicoectomy was performed by low-speed diamond burs. The roots were randomly divided into eight groups (n=8) as follows; Group1: Only apicoectomy without a cavity preparation (CP); Group2: Nd:YAG laser after apicoectomy without a CP; Group: CP with bur; Group4: CP/bur and filled with Biodentine; Group5: CP/bur+Nd:YAG irradiation+Biodentine; Group6: CP with Er:YAG; CP/Er:YAG+Nd:YAG irradiation+Biodentine. The root surfaces were coated with a double layer of nail varnish except the retrograde-filled surfaces and roots were immersed in Indian-ink for 15 days. Dye penetration level was assessed with clearing technique. Data were statistically analyzed by using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. Results: Retrofilling with Biodentine groups showed the lowest microleakage (p0.05). However; there were statistical significant differences between apicoectomy and apicoectomy+Nd:YAG laser group (p

Özet

Amaç: Erbium:Yttrium Aluminium Garnet (Er:YAG) ve Neodymium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet (Nd:YAG) lazer kullanılarak hazırlanmış retrograd kavitelerde Biodentin dolgu materyeli kullanımının apikal sızıntı üzerine etkisinin boya penetrasyon testi kullanılarak incelenmesidir. Gereç ve yöntem: Kuronları uzaklaştırılan 64 adet tek köklü çekilmiş insan dişi ProTaper eğe sistemi ile F4'e kadar ile şekillendirildi. Guta-perka ve AH plus kanal patı kullanılarak lateral kondensasyon yöntemi ile dolduruldu. Apikal 3 mm' lik parçalar kökün uzun aksına 90° olacak şekilde kesilerek uzaklaştırıldı. Kökler rastgele 8 gruba ayrıldı. (n:8); Grup 1: Hiçbir işlem yapılmadı, Grup 2: Apikal kök yüzeyine Nd:YAG lazer uygulandı, Grup 3: Fissür frez ile Sınıf 1 kavite açıldı (KP), Grup 4: Fissür frez ile KP+Biodentin, Grup 5: Fissür frez ile KP+Nd:YAG lazer+Biodentin, Grup 6: Er:YAG lazer ile KP, Grup 7: Er:YAG lazer ile KP+Biodentin, Grup 8: Er:YAG lazer ile KP+Nd:YAG lazer+ Biodentin. Kök yüzeyleri apikal 1mm hariç iki kat tırnak cilası kaplandı ve 15 gün süre ile çini mürekkebinde bekletildi. Apikal sızıntı şeffaflaştırma yöntemi ile değerlendirildi. İstatistiksel analiz MannWhitney U ve Kruskal-Wallis testleri kullanılarak yapıldı. Bulgular: Biodentin ile doldurulmuş gruplar (4,5,7,8) arasında boya sızıntısı açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir fark bulunmamıştır (p>0.05). Biodentin uygulanan tüm gruplar ile (4,5,7,8) uygulanmayan diğer tüm gruplar (1,2,3,6) arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark tespit edilmiştir (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KAPLAN, F., ARSLAN, D., GÜNEŞER, M. B., ÜŞÜMEZ, A. (2022). THE EFFECT OF VARIOUS RETROCAVITY PREPARATION TECHNIQUES AND RETROFILLING WITH BIODENTINE ON APICAL MICROLEAKAGE. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 3, 139–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/452052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kim S, Kratchman S. Modern endodontic surgery concepts and practice: a review. J Endod 2006;32:601-23
  2. Mohammadi Z. Laser applications in endodontics: an update review. Int Dent J 2009;59:35-46
  3. Wang N, Knight K, Dao T, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics-The Toronto Study. Phases I and II: apical surgery. J Endod 2004;30:751-61
  4. Garip H, Garip Y, Orucoglu H, Hatipoglu S. Effect of the angle of apical resection on apical leakage, measured with a computerized fluid filtration device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;111:50-5
  5. Pereira CL, Cenci MS, Demarco FF. Sealing ability of MTA, Super EBA, Vitremer and amalgam as rootend filling materials. Braz Oral Res 2004;18:317- 21
  6. Roy R, Chandler NP, Lin J. Peripheral dentin thickness after root-end cavity preparation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;105:263-6
  7. Post LK, Lima FG, Xavier CB, Demarco FF, Gerhardt-Oliveira M. Sealing ability of MTA and amalgam in different root-end preparations and resection bevel angles: an in vitro evaluation using marginal dye leakage. Braz Dent J 2010;21:416-9
  8. Cohen S, M.Hargreaves K. Pathways of the pulp. 9th ed. St Louis; C.V. Mosby:2006.p.628
  9. Taschieri S, Testori T, Francetti L, Del Fabbro M. Effects of ultrasonic root end preparation on resected root surfaces: SEM evaluation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;98:611-8
  10. Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Garcia RB, Bernardineli N, Baldi JV, Victorino FR, et al. Evaluation of apical cavity preparation with a new type of ultrasonic diamond tip. J Endod 2007;33:484-7. 11.Ishikawa H, Sawada N, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Evaluation of root-end cavity preparation using ultrasonic retrotips. Int Endod J 2003;36:586-90
  11. Kimura Y, Wilder-Smith P, Matsumoto K. Lasers in endodontics: a review. Int Endod J 2000;33:173- 85
  12. Araki AT, Ibraki Y, Kawakami T, Lage-Marques JL. Er:Yag laser irradiation of the microbiological apical biofilm. Braz Dent J 2006;17:296-9
  13. Kato J, Moriya K, Jayawardena JA, Wijeyeweera RL. Clinical application of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation in children. J Clin Laser Med Surg 2003;21:151-5
  14. Franco EJ AG, Greghi SLA. Comparative evaluation of periodontal radicular therapies conventional. Oral Sci 2005;1:35-42
  15. Oliveira RG, Gouw-Soares S, Baldochi SL, Eduardo CP. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and optical microscopy: effects of Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers on apical seals after apicoectomy and retrofill.