SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT PROSTHESUS CONNECTION

İMPLANT – PROTEZ BAĞLANTISINDA SONLU ELEMAN ANALİZ YÖNTEMİ

Ali Can BULUT
Saadet ATSÜ
Muhammet Emin AKSAN
Pages
91–97
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article efforts to give a general overview about finite element stress analysis and its use in the implant-supported prosthesis

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Stress analysis techniques are being used in dental research for a long time because of allowing more successful restorations by giving an aid to a better understanding of biomechanics in the oral environment.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Finite element analysis (FEA) has been used extensively to predict the biomechanical performance of various dental implant designs as well as the effect of clinical factors on implant success.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article efforts to give a general overview about finite element stress analysis and its use in the implant-supported prosthesis
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Stress analysis techniques are being used in dental research for a long time because of allowing more successful restorations by giving an aid to a better understanding of biomechanics in the oral environment. Finite element analysis (FEA) has been used extensively to predict the biomechanical performance of various dental implant designs as well as the effect of clinical factors on implant success. This article efforts to give a general overview about finite element stress analysis and its use in the implant-supported prosthesis

Özet

Stres analizi yöntemleri ağız içi biyomekaniğin daha iyi anlaşılmasına restorasyonlar yapılabilmesine imkan verdikleri için diş hekimliği kullanılmaktadır. Sonlu eleman stres analiz yöntemi birçok implant dizaynının biyomekanik performansının yanı sıra klinik faktörlerin de implant başarısı üzerindeki etkisinin geniş bir biçimde incelenebildiği bir yöntemdir. Bu derleme çalışmasında sonlu elemanlar stres analizi ve implant destekli protez uygulama alanlarıyla ilgili genel bir bakış açısı sunulmaya çalışılmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

BULUT, A. C., ATSÜ, S., AKSAN, M. E. (2022). FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS OF IMPLANT PROSTHESUS CONNECTION. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 91–97. https://ajindex.com/articles/451947

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Taşkınsel E, Gümüş HÖ. Sonlu elemanlar stres analizi ve restoratif diş hekimliğinde kullanımı. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2014; 8: 131-5
  2. Geng JP, Tan K, Liu G, Application of finite element analysis in implant dentistry: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 585-98
  3. Kayabaşı O, Yüzbaşıoğlu E, Erzincanlı F. Static, dynamic and fatigue behaviors of dental implant using finite element method. Advances in Engineering 2006; 37: 649–58
  4. Misch, CE. Dental Implant Prosthetics. 1st ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby 2005; 324-36
  5. Lisa A, Lang LA, Kang BB, Wang RF, Lang BR. Finite element analysis to determine implant preload. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 539-46
  6. Silva GC, Cornacchia TM, Magalhães CS, Bueno AC, Moreira AN. Biomechanical evaluation of screwand cement-retained implant-supported prostheses: A nonlinear finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112: 1479-88
  7. Ebadian B, Farzın M, Talebi S, Khodaeian N. Evaluation of stress distribution of implant‑retained mandibular overdenture with different vertical restorative spaces: A finite element analysis. Dent Res J 2012; 9: 117-21
  8. Liu J, Pan S, Dong J, Mo Z, Fan Y, Feng H. Influence of implant number on the biomechanical behaviour of mandibular implant-retained/ supported overdentures: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent 2013; 41: 241-9
  9. Dashti MH, Atashrazm P, Emadi MI, Mishaeel S, Banava S. The effects of two attachment types on the stresses introduced to the mandibular residualridge: A 3D finite element analysis. Quint Int Prosthod 2013; 44: 8
  10. Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, Barao VAR, Rocha EP. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA, J Oral Rehabil 2008; 35: 766–74
  11. Prakash V, De Souza M, Adhikari R. A comparison of stress distribution and flexion among various designs of bar attachments for implant overdentures: A three dimensional finite element analysis Indian J Dent Res 2009; 20: 31-6
  12. Meriç G, Erkmen E, Kurt A, Tunç Y, Eser A. Influence of prosthesis type and material on thestress distribution in bone around implants: A 3- dimensional finite element analysis, J Dent Sci 2011; 6: 25-32
  13. Tsumita M, Kokubo Y, Von Steyern PV, Fukushima S, Effect of framework shape on the fracture strength of ımplant-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures in the molar region. J Prosthod 2008; 17: 274–85
  14. Klineberg IJ, Trulsson M, Murray GM. Occlusion on implants - is there a p