SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1

COMPARISON OF EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FILE SYSTEMS ON GLIDE PATH CREATION

REHBER YOLU OLUŞTURULMASINDA FARKLI EĞE SİSTEMLERİNİN ETKİNLİKLERİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Koray YILMAZ
Gülşah USLU
Taha ÖZYÜREK
Pages
13–17
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, there was no significant difference among PathFile, ProGlider and manual file groups in 5 different measurement points

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the shaping ability of different glide path rotary nickel-titanium files in simulated J-shaped canals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Thirty J-shaped canals in resin blocks were prepared using PathFile, ProGlider or manual files (n: 10 canals/group).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, there was no significant difference among PathFile, ProGlider and manual file groups in 5 different measurement points
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the shaping ability of different glide path rotary nickel-titanium files in simulated J-shaped canals. Material and Methods: Thirty J-shaped canals in resin blocks were prepared using PathFile, ProGlider or manual files (n: 10 canals/group). Composite images were made from the superimposition of pre- and postinstrumentation images in digital platform. The amount of resin removed by each system was measured by using a digital template and image analysis software. Canal aberrations were also recorded. The data were statistically analyzed by using one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Results: There was no significantly difference between groups according to the amount of resin removal (P > 0.05). One ledge formation was inspected during canal preparation in manual group. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, there was no significant difference among PathFile, ProGlider and manual file groups in 5 different measurement points

Özet

Amaç: Farklı nikel-titanyum döner rehber yol eğelerinin şekillendirme etkinliklerinin J şekilli yapay kanallarda değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Otuz adet J şekilli kanallara sahip rezin blok PathFile, ProGlider ve manuel eğeler (n: 10 kanal/grup) kullanılarak şekillendirildi. Şekillendirme öncesi ve sonrası elde edilen fotoğraflar dijital ortamda üst üste getirilerek çakıştırılmış görüntüler elde edildi. Eğeler tarafından uzaklaştırılan rezin miktarı dijital ölçüm kalıbı ve fotoğraf analiz programı kullanılarak ölçüldü. Kanal düzensizlikleri de kayıt edildi. Elde edilen veriler tek yönlü varyans analizi ve post hoc Tukey testi kullanılarak istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Eğelerin uzaklaştırdığı rezin miktarları arasında gruplar arasında istatistiksel fark bulunmadı (P > 0,05). Kanal şekillendirmesi sırasında manuel eğe grubunda 1 örnekte basamak oluşumu gözlendi. Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sınırları dahilinde test edilen

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, K., USLU, G., ÖZYÜREK, T. (2022). COMPARISON OF EFFECT OF DIFFERENT FILE SYSTEMS ON GLIDE PATH CREATION. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 1, 13–17. https://ajindex.com/articles/451946

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Roland DD, Andelin WE, Browning DF, et al. The effect of preflaring on the rates of separation for 0.04 taper nickel titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 2002;28:543-5
  2. Berutti E, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, et al. Use of nickel-titanium rotary Pathfile to create the glide path: comparison with manual preflaring in simulated root canals. J Endod 2009;35:408-12
  3. Platino PV, Biedma BM, Liebana CR, et al. The influence of a manual glide path on the separation rate of NiTi rotary instruments. J Endod 2005; 31:114-6
  4. Berutti E, Negro AR, Lendini M, et al. Influence of manual preflaring and torque on the failure rate of Protaper rotary instruments. J Endod 2004;30:228- 30
  5. Jafarzadeh H, Abbott PV. Ledge formation: Review of a great challenge in endodontics. J Endod 2007;33:1155-62
  6. Blum JY, Machtou P, Ruddle C, et al. Analysis of mechanical preparations in extracted teeth using ProTaper rotary instruments: value of the safety quotient. J Endod 2003;29:567-75
  7. Berutti E, Paolino DS, Chiandussi G, Alovisi M, Cantatore G, Castellucci A, Pasqualin D. Root canal anatomy preservation of WaveOne reciprocating files with or without glide path. J Endod 2012;38:101-4
  8. Zanette F, Grazziotin-Soares R, Flores ME, Fontanella VRC, Gavini G, Barletta FB. Apical root canal transportation and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Universal with and without PathFile. J Endod 2014;40:688-93
  9. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, et al. Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire and controlled memory wire. J Endod 2015;41:535-8
  10. Thompson M, Sidow SJ, Lindsey K, Chuang A, McPherson JC. Evaluation of a new filing system's ability to maintain canal morphology. J Endod 2014;40:867-70
  11. Sonntag D, Guntermann A, Kim SK, Stachniss V. Root canal shaping with manual stainless steel files and rotary Ni-Ti files performed by students. Int Endod J 2003;36:246-55
  12. Calberson FLG, Deroose CAJG, Hommez GMG, De Moor RJG. Shaping ability of ProTaper nickeltitanium files in simulated resin root canals. Int Endod J 2004;37:613-23
  13. Schäfer E, Tepel J, Hoppe W. Properties of endodontic hand instruments used in rotary motion Part 2. instrumentation of curved canals. J Endod 1995;21:493-7
  14. Kum KY, Spängberg L, Cha BY, Il-Young J, SeungJong L, Chan-Young L. Shaping ability of three ProFile rotary instrumentation techniques in simulated resin root canals. J Endod