Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3

FIXED DENTAL REHABILITATION USING MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA CERAMIC: A CLINICAL CASE REPORT

MONOLİTİK ZİRKONYA SERAMİK KULLANILARAK SABİT DENTAL REHABİLİTASYON: KLİNİK VAKA RAPORU

Pages
385–390
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Good esthetic and functional results were achieved with no complications reported after 12 months.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Most of the current all-ceramic restorations are composed of monolithic yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramics, which exhibits superior mechanical properties compared with other ceramics.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Monolithic zirconia is a biocompatible material that is not cytotoxic and has low bacterial adhesion.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Good esthetic and functional results were achieved with no complications reported after 12 months.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Most of the current all-ceramic restorations are composed of monolithic yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) ceramics, which exhibits superior mechanical properties compared with other ceramics. Monolithic zirconia is a biocompatible material that is not cytotoxic and has low bacterial adhesion. Prosthetic rehabilitation using monolithic zirconia may help to prevent complications associated with bilayered ceramics systems. Monolithic zirconia fixed partial dentures represent an alternative option to zirconia based or metal ceramic restorations. Moreover, the use of monolithic zirconia becomes popular for anterior teeth due to their translucent property. This clinical report describes the use of a monolithic ceramic restoration. Good esthetic and functional results were achieved with no complications reported after 12 months.

Özet

Günümüzde yapılan tam seramik restorasyonlarınbüyük çoğunluğu diğer seramikler ile karşılaştırıldığızaman yüksek mekanik özellikler gösteren monolitikitriyum-stabilize tetragonal zirkonya polikristal(Ytterbium- Y-TZP) seramiklerden oluşmaktadır. Monolitikzirkonya sitotoksik etki göstermeyen ve bakteriyeladezyonun düşük olduğu biyouyumlu bir materyaldir.Protetik rehabilitasyonda monolitik zirkonya kullanılmasıile çift tabakalı seramik sistemlerde gözlenenkomplikasyonlar engellenebilir. Monolitik zirkonya, zirkonyaveya metal alt yapılı sabit bölümlü protezlerinalternatifi olarak kullanılabilir. Ayrıca translusensi özelliğindendolayı anterior bölgede kullanımı gün geçtikçeyaygınlaşmaktadır. Bu klinik raporda monolitik zirkonyaseramik sistemi ile kantilever restorasyon uygulamasıanlatılmaktadır. 12 aylık sonuçlara göre herhangi birkomplikasyon görülmemiştir. İyi estetik ve fonksiyonelsonuçlar elde edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DURKAN, R., DESTE, G. (2022). FIXED DENTAL REHABILITATION USING MONOLITHIC ZIRCONIA CERAMIC: A CLINICAL CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 3, 385–390. https://ajindex.com/articles/451901

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Takeichi T, Katsoulis J, Blatz MB. Clinical outcome of single porcelain-fused-to-zirconium dioxide crowns: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:455-61.
  2. Marchack BW, Sato S, Marchack CB, White SN. Complete and partial contour zirconia designs for crowns and fixed dental prostheses: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:145-52.
  3. Denry I, Kelly JR. State of the art of zirconia for dental applications. Dent Mater 2008;24:299–307.
  4. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37: 41–52.
  5. Thulasidas S, Givan DA, Lemons JE, O'Neal SJ, Ramp LC, Liu PR. Influence of implant angulation on the fracture resistance of zirconia abutments. J Prosthodont 2015;24:127-35.
  6. Stober T, Bermejo JL, Rammelsberg P, Schmitter M. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use. J Oral Rehabil 2014;41:314-22.
  7. Yoon HI, Han JS. Prosthetic rehabilitation with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing dental technology for a patient with a mandibulectomy: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:133-6.
  8. Heintze SD, Rousson V. Survival of zirconia- and metal-supported fixed dental prostheses: a systematic review. Int J Prosthodont 2010;23:493– 502. Thalji GN, Cooper LF. Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Rehabilitation with Monolithic Zirconia: A Clinical Case Report. J Esthet Restor Dent 2014;26:88-96.
  9. Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2013;24:659–65.
  10. Uludamar A, Aygün Ş, Kulak Özkan Y. Zirconıa full ceramic restorations.J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni Supplement. 2012;5:132-41.
  11. Schmitter M, Lotze G, Bömicke W, Rues S. Influence of surface treatment on the in-vitro fracture resistance of zirconia-based all-ceramic anterior crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:1552-60.
  12. Guess PC, Schultheis S, Bonfante EA, Coelho PG, Ferencz JL, Silva NR. All-ceramic systems: laboratory and clinical performance. Dent Clin North Am 2011;55:333–52. Rojas-Vizcaya F. Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. J Prosthodont 2011;20:570–6.
  13. Lameira DP, Buarque e Silva WA, Andrade e Silva F, De Souza GM. Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns. Biomed Res Int. 2015;20