SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION METHOD FOR DEFORMATION OF RETENTIVE CAPS IN IMPLANT SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT

İMPLANT ÜSTÜ OVERDENTURE PROTEZLERDE TUTUCU BAŞLIK DEFORMASYONUNA ALTERNATİF BİR ÇÖZÜM YÖNTEMİ: BİR OLGU SUNUMU

Zeynep YEŞİL DUYMUŞ
Bilal HOLOĞLU
Pages
497–500
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this case report information was provided on an alternative method applied for the removal of the patient's complaints due to loss of retention of implant supported overdenture prosthesis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Nowadays implant supported overdenture dentures are accepted as a standard treatment protocol due to improving life quality of edentulous patients with their positive contribution on retention and stability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Some mechanisms such as ball attachment, locator attachment and magnet retained system might be used for providing retention of implant supported overdenture prosthesis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this case report information was provided on an alternative method applied for the removal of the patient's complaints due to loss of retention of implant supported overdenture prosthesis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Nowadays implant supported overdenture dentures are accepted as a standard treatment protocol due to improving life quality of edentulous patients with their positive contribution on retention and stability. Some mechanisms such as ball attachment, locator attachment and magnet retained system might be used for providing retention of implant supported overdenture prosthesis. Retainer caps are placed according to the retention mechanism used in the prosthesis. It is known that the most common mechanical problem was loss of retention due to deformation of the plastic structures when the longterm success of implant overdenture prosthesis evaluated. Generally the retention can be restored again with renovation of plastic structures. In this case report information was provided on an alternative method applied for the removal of the patient's complaints due to loss of retention of implant supported overdenture prosthesis.

Özet

İmplant üstü overdenture protezler retansiyon ve stabiliteye olumlu katkılarından dolayı tam dişsiz hastaların yaşam kalitelerini artırmakta ve günümüzde standart bir tedavi protokolü olarak kabul edilmektedir. İmplant üstü overdenture protezlerde implantların üzerine topuz başlı ataşman, locator ataşman, barlı eklem veya mıknatıs gibi mekanizmalar yerleştirilerek tutuculuk sağlanmaktadır. Protezin içine kullanılan bağlantı mekanizmasına göre tutucu başlıklar yerleştirilmektedir. İmplant üstü overdenture protezlerin uzun dönem başarıları değerlendirildiğinde en sık karşılaşılan mekanik problemin tutucu başlıkların plastik yapılarındaki deformasyona bağlı retansiyon kaybı olduğu bilinmektedir. Çoğunlukla lastik yapıların yenilenmesi ile tutuculuk yeniden sağlanabilmektedir. Bu olgu sunumunda implant üstü overdenture protezindeki tutuculuk kaybı nedeniyle kliniğimize başvuran bir hastanın şikayetlerinin giderilmesine yönelik uygulanan alternatif yöntem hakkında bilgi verilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

DUYMUŞ, Z. Y., HOLOĞLU, B. (2022). AN ALTERNATIVE SOLUTION METHOD FOR DEFORMATION OF RETENTIVE CAPS IN IMPLANT SUPPORTED OVERDENTURE PROSTHESIS: A CASE REPORT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 497–500. https://ajindex.com/articles/451821

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Cox JF, Zarb GA. The longitudinal clinical efficacy of osseointegrated dental implants: A 3 year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987;2: 91- 100. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGill.consensus statement on overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 601-2. Canay ġ, Güncü MB. Ġmplant destekli overdenture protezlerde ortaya çıkan sorunlar. Türkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont-Special Topics 2015;1:60-5.
  2. Van Kampen F., Cune M., van der Bilt A., Bosman F. Retention and postinsertion maintenance of bar-clip, ball and magnet attachments in mandibular implant overdenture treatment: an in vivo comparison after 3 months of function. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14: 720- 6. Cehreli MC, Karasoy D, Kökat AM, Akça K, Eckert S. A systematic review of marginal bone loss around implants retaining or supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2010; 25: 266-77.
  3. Payne AG, Solomons YF. The prosthodontic maintenance requirements of mandibular mucosa- and implant-supported overdentures: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:238-43.
  4. Öztük G, Çömlekoğlu MD, Sonugelen M. Ġmplant destekli hareketli protezlerde tutucu mekanizmaların klinik baĢarıya etkisi: Derleme. Ege Üniv DiĢ Hek Fak Derg 2013;34:11-6.
  5. Ünver S, Bankoğlu G, Karakoca Nemli S. Dental implantlarda protetik komplikasyonlar. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2012;6:1109-18.
  6. Kaptein ML, De Putter C, De Lange GL, Blijdorp PA. A clinical evaluation of 76 implant-supported superstructures in the composite grafted maxilla. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26: 619-23.
  7. Cakarer S, Can T, Yaltırık M, Keskin C. Comp-14. lications associated with the ball, bar and Locator attachments for implant-supported overdentures. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2011;1: 953-9.
  8. Mccabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials. 8th ed, U.K:Blackwell Science; 2000: 108-114.