SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3

ZIRCONIA DENTAL IMPLANTS: CLINICAL PARAMETERS, STRUCTURAL FEATURES, CURRENT SYSTEMS

ZİRKONYA DENTAL İMPLANTLAR: KLİNİK PARAMETRELER, YAPISAL ÖZELLİKLER, GÜNCEL SİSTEMLER

Perihan OYAR
Gonca DESTE
Rukiye DURKAN
Pages
526–533
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article describes the clinical parameters of single or two-pieces zirconia dental implant systems which is increasingly used in prosthetic dentistry and the advantages and disadvantages of zirconia implants, structural properties of them and current zirconia implant systems.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:All over the world zirconia dental implants are made as an alternative to biotechnology products of titanium implants by the advances in implant systems and material production industry.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Zirconia ceramic implant is one of the preferred methods for the construction of maxillary anterior region aesthetic implant prostheses.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article describes the clinical parameters of single or two-pieces zirconia dental implant systems which is increasingly used in prosthetic dentistry and the advantages and disadvantages of zirconia implants, structural properties of them and current zirconia implant systems.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

All over the world zirconia dental implants are made as an alternative to biotechnology products of titanium implants by the advances in implant systems and material production industry. Zirconia ceramic implant is one of the preferred methods for the construction of maxillary anterior region aesthetic implant prostheses. This article describes the clinical parameters of single or two-pieces zirconia dental implant systems which is increasingly used in prosthetic dentistry and the advantages and disadvantages of zirconia implants, structural properties of them and current zirconia implant systems.

Özet

Bütün dünyada implant sistemleri ve materyal üretimendüstrisindeki gelişmeler ile biyoteknoloji ürünleriolan titanyum implantlara alternatif olabilecek zirkonyadental implantlar üretilmiştir. Zirkonya seramikimplantlar özellikle üst çene anterior bölge estetikimplant protezlerinin yapımında tercih edilenyöntemlerden biridir. Bu makalede protetik dişhekimliğinde kullanımları giderek artan tek parça veyaiki parçalı sistemleri bulunan zirkonya dentalimplantlarda klinik parametreler, zirkonya implantlarınavantaj ve dezavantajları ile yapısal özellikleri vegüncel zirkonya implant sistemleri anlatılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

OYAR, P., DESTE, G., DURKAN, R. (2022). ZIRCONIA DENTAL IMPLANTS: CLINICAL PARAMETERS, STRUCTURAL FEATURES, CURRENT SYSTEMS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 3, 526–533. https://ajindex.com/articles/451790

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ananth H, Kundapur V, HS Mohammed, Anand M, GS. Amarnath, Mankar S. A Review on Biomaterials in Dental Implantology. Int J Biomed Sci 2015;11:113-20.
  2. Hashim D, Cionca N, Courvoisier DS, Mombelli A. A systematic review of the clinical survival of zirconia implants. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;1853-9
  3. Kohal RJ, Bächle M, Renz A, Butz F.Evaluation of alumina toughened zirconia implants with a sintered, moderately rough surface: An experiment in the rat. Dent Mater 2016;32:65-72.
  4. Wenz HJ, Bartsch J, Wolfart S, Kern M. Osseointegration and clinical success of zirconia dental implants: A systematic review. Int J Prosthodont. 2008;21:27-36.
  5. Regish KM, Sharma D, Prithviraj DR. An overview of immediate root analogue zirconia implants. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:225-33.
  6. Vanlıoğlu B, Özkan Y, Özkan YK. Estetik bölgede implant-üstü restorasyonlarda güçlendirilmiş seramik dayanaklar. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2012;5:58-64. Holländer J, Lorenz J, Stübinger S, Hölscher W, Heidemann D, Ghanaati S, Sader R. Zirconia dental implants: Investigation of clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2016;31:855-64.
  7. Akagawa Y, Ichikawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Interface histology of unloaded and early loaded partially stabilized zirconia endosseous implant in initial bone healing. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:599-604.
  8. Vohra F, Al-Kheraif AAA, Ghani SM, Hassan MIA, Alnassar T, Javed F. Crestal bone loss and peri implant inflammatory parameters around zirconia implants: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:351-7.
  9. Depprich R, Naujoks C, Ommerborn M, Schwarz F, Kubler NR, Handschel J. Current findings regarding zirconia implants. Clin Implant Dent Rel Res 2014;16:124-37.
  10. Coray R, Zeltner M, Özcan M. Fracture strength of implant abutments after fatigue testing: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2016;62:333-46.
  11. Osman RB, Swain MV A critical review of dental implant materials with an emphasis on titanium versus zirconia. Materials 2015;8:932-58.
  12. Andreiotelli M, Wenz HJ, Kohal RJ. Are ceramic implants a viable alternative to titanium implants? A systematic literature review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;4:32-47.
  13. Rohr N, Coldeab A, Zitzmannc NU, Fischera J.Loading capacity of zirconia implant supported hybrid ceramic crowns. Dent Mater 2015;31:279- 88. Pearce AI, Richards RG, Milz S, Schneider E, et al. Animal models for implant biomaterial research in bone: A review. Euro Cells Mater 2007;13:1-10. Pje