Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1

THIRD DIMENSION IN DENTAL DIGITAL IMAGING

DENTAL DİJİTAL GÖRÜNTÜLEMEDE ÜÇÜNCÜ BOYUT

Pages
133–142
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, the principles, technical features, indications, advantages and disadvantages of DVT systems are presented.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Dental volumetric tomography (DVT), which is developed uniquely for dentomaxillofacial imaging, appeared in the dental world concurrently with recent rapid developments in digital radiology technology, and is becoming more popular in dental practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:DVT devices that generate lower radiation doses and have lower cost when compared to medical CT enable acquirement of three dimensional data and reconstruction of these digital images on personal computers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, the principles, technical features, indications, advantages and disadvantages of DVT systems are presented.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Dental volumetric tomography (DVT), which is developed uniquely for dentomaxillofacial imaging, appeared in the dental world concurrently with recent rapid developments in digital radiology technology, and is becoming more popular in dental practice. DVT devices that generate lower radiation doses and have lower cost when compared to medical CT enable acquirement of three dimensional data and reconstruction of these digital images on personal computers. In this review, the principles, technical features, indications, advantages and disadvantages of DVT systems are presented.

Özet

Son yıllarda hızla ilerleyen dijital radyoloji teknolojisininürünü olan ve özellikle dentomaksillofasiyal yapılarıngörüntülenmesi amacıyla geliştirilen dental volumetriktomografi (DVT), diş hekimliği uygulamalarında hergeçen gün daha fazla kullanım alanı bulmaktadır.Medikal bilgisayarlı tomografi cihazlarına göre dahaucuz ve daha düşük radyasyon dozuna sahip olan DVTcihazları, diş hekimliğinde üç boyutlu verilerin eldeedilmesine ve görüntüler üzerinde rekonstrüksiyonişlemlerinin yapılabilmesine olanak sağlamaktadır. Buderlemede DVT görüntüleme sistemlerinin çalışmaprensipleri, teknik özellikleri, kullanım alanları, avantajve dezavantajları ile ilgili genel bilgiler sunulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNERİ, P., ERGÜN, S. (2022). THIRD DIMENSION IN DENTAL DIGITAL IMAGING. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 1, 133–142. https://ajindex.com/articles/451725

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: esence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J 2012;51:46-60.
  2. Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J 2009;207:23-8.
  3. Kamburoğlu K, Acar B, Yakar EN, Paksoy CS. Dentomaksillofasiyal konik ışın demetli bilgisayarlı tomografi bölüm 1: Temel prensipler. ADO Klinik Bilim Derg 2012;6:1125-36.
  4. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006;72:75- 80. Borahan MO, Dumlu A, Pekiner FN. Diş hekimliğinde yeni bir çağın başlangıcı: Dental volumetrik tomografi. İstanbul Dişhek Odası Derg 2012;143:32-5.
  5. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008;52: 707-30.
  6. Evlice BK, Öztunç H. Dijital radyografi ve diş hekimliğinde ileri görüntüleme yöntemleri. Arşiv Kaynak Tarama Dergisi 2013;22:230-8.
  7. Büyük SK, Ramoğlu Sİ. Ortodontik teşhiste konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi. Sağlık Bilim Derg 2011;20:227-34. Hounsfield GN. Nobel Lecture. Computed medical imaging. J Radiol 1980;61:459-68.
  8. Erdem T, Aydın KC. Diş hekimliğinde kullanılan ileri görüntüleme teknikleri. TDBD 2006;96:48-52.
  9. Kumar M, Shanavas M, Sidappa A, Kiran M. Cone beam computed tomography-Know its secrets. J Int Oral Health 2015;7:64-8.
  10. Angelopoulos C, Scarfe WC, Farman AG. A comparison of maxillofacial CBCT and medical CT. Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2012;20:1-17. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008;95:628-37.
  11. Pauwels R, Araki K, Siewerdsen JH, Thongvigitmanee SS. Technical aspects of dental CBCT: state of the art. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2015;44: 20140224. Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;40:265-73.
  12. Brown AA, Scarfe WC, Scheetz JP, Silveira AM, Farman AG. Linear accuracy of cone beam CT derived 3D images. Angle Orthod 2009;79:150-7. Sukovic P. Cone beam computed tomography in craniofacial imaging. Orthod Craniofac Res 2003;6:31-6.
  13. Sur J, Seki K, Koizumi H, Nakajima K, Okano T. Effects of tube current on cone-beam computerized tomography image quality for presurgical implant planning in vitro. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;110:e29-33. Barghan S, Tetradis S, Mallaya SM. Application of cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the temporamandibular joints. Aust Dent J 2012;57:109-18.