Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

THE EFFECT OF FINISHING PROCESSES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND CYTOTOXICITY IN RESTORATIONS OBTAINED FROM CAD/CAM BLOCKS

CAD/CAM BLOKLARDAN ELDE EDİLEN RESTORASYONLARDA BİTİM İŞLEMLERİNİN YÜZEY PÜRÜZLÜLÜĞÜNE VE SİTOTOKSİSİTEYE ETKİSİ

Pages
633–638
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The highest optical density values were observed in glaze treated samples obtained from feldspathic blocks (0.821±0.054 mg/ml).Conclusion;Within the limitations of this study, despite the aesthetically pleasure and sufficient durability, nanoseramic materials produce high roughness and cytotoxicity values after milling process.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim;Technological developments facilitate CAD / CAM systems and make widespread usage.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to examine the roughness of 4 different surfaces obtained from 2 different CAD/CAM blocks using a profilometer device and to evaluate the effects of these surfaces on the survival of fibroblast cells.Materials and Methods;Feldspathic and nanoseramic CAD/CAM blocks were cut with carbon disc to obtain a total of 40 samples.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The highest optical density values were observed in glaze treated samples obtained from feldspathic blocks (0.821±0.054 mg/ml).Conclusion;Within the limitations of this study, despite the aesthetically pleasure and sufficient durability, nanoseramic materials produce high roughness and cytotoxicity values after milling process.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:40 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim;Technological developments facilitate CAD / CAM systems and make widespread usage. The composition, surface properties and density of the blocks used for restorative purposes in CAD/CAM systems may cause them to exhibit different surface properties after the milling process. Cytotoxicity is a series of events that lead to permanent functional impairment or destruction in cells due to the structural composition and surface properties of materials in contact with tissues.Surface investigations and cytotoxicity assessments are still limited fabricated with CAD/CAM systems. The aim of this study is to examine the roughness of 4 different surfaces obtained from 2 different CAD/CAM blocks using a profilometer device and to evaluate the effects of these surfaces on the survival of fibroblast cells.Materials and Methods;Feldspathic and nanoseramic CAD/CAM blocks were cut with carbon disc to obtain a total of 40 samples. All samples were smooted by applying 300 and 600 grit sandpaper, respectively. Mechanical polishing, glazing and bonding processes were applied to 4 subgroups. Mouse fibroblast cells were cultured for cytotoxicity tests. The optical density of cell survival was measured by spectrophotometric method at 630 nm wavelength.Results;Thehighestroughnessvalueswereobservedinnon-bondedsamplesobtainedfromnanoseramicblocks (1,073±0,014 μ). The least roughness value was observed in glaze samples obtained from feldspathic blocks. The highest optical density values were observed in glaze treated samples obtained from feldspathic blocks (0.821±0.054 mg/ml).Conclusion;Within the limitations of this study, despite the aesthetically pleasure and sufficient durability, nanoseramic materials produce high roughness and cytotoxicity values after milling process.

Özet

Amaç;Günümüzde teknolojik gelişmeler CAD/CAM sistemlerine ulaşımı kolaylaştırmakta ve kullanımı yaygınlaştırmaktadır. CAD/CAM sistemlerinde restoratif amaçlı olarak kullanılan blokların kompozisyonları, yüzey özellikleri ve yoğunluğu restorasyonun işlenmesi sonrası farklı yüzey özellikleri sergilemelerine neden olabilir.Sitotoksisite, dokularla temas halindeki materyallerin yapısal bileşimi ve yüzey özellikleri nedeniyle hücrelerde kalıcı fonksiyonel bozukluğa veya yok oluşa yol açan bir dizi olaydır. CAD/CAM sistemleri kullanılarak elde edilen restorasyonlarda yüzey incelemeleri ve sitotoksisite değerlendirmeleri henüz kısıtlıdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı 2 farklı CAD/CAM bloktan elde edilen 4 farklı bitim yüzeyin pürüzlülüğünü profilometre cihazı kullanılarak incelemek ve bu yüzeylerin fibroblast hücrelerinin sağ kalımına etkisini değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntem;Feldspatik ve nanoseramik CAD/CAM bloklar, karbon separe ile kesilerek toplam 40 adet örnek elde edildi. Tüm örneklere sırasıyla 300 ve 600 grit partiküllü zımpara uygulanarak tesviye yapıldı. Elde edilen 10’arlı 4 alt gruba mekanik polisaj, glaze ve bond işlemleri uygulandı. Sitotoksisite testleri için kullanılan fare fibroblast hücreleri kültüre edildi. Hücre sağ kalımlarının optik yoğunluğu, 630 nm dalga boyunda spektrofotometrik yöntemle ölçüldü. Bulgular;En yüksek pürüzlülük değerleri nanoseramik bloklardan elde edilen bonding işlemi uygulanmamış örneklerde gözlemlendi (1,073±0,014 μ). En az pürüzlülük değeri feldspatik bloklardan elde edilen, glaze uygulanan örneklerde gözlemlendi. En yüksek Optik yoğunlukdeğerleri feldspatik bloklardan elde edilen glaze işlemi uygulanmış örneklerde gözlemlendi (0,821±0,054 mg/ml).Sonuç;Limitasyonlarıyla birlikte bu çalışmanın sonuçları, her ne kadar estetik ve yeterli derecede dayanıklı da olsa nanoseramik materyallerin preperasyon sonrası yüksek pürüzlülük ve sitotoksisite değerleri ortaya çıkardığını göstermektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, C., UZUN, G. (2022). THE EFFECT OF FINISHING PROCESSES ON SURFACE ROUGHNESS AND CYTOTOXICITY IN RESTORATIONS OBTAINED FROM CAD/CAM BLOCKS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 633–638. https://ajindex.com/articles/451695

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Rashid H. The effect of surface roughness on ceramics used in dentistry: A review of literature. Eur J Dent 2014;8:571-9
  2. Bui FQ, Almeida-da-Silva CLC, Huynh B, Trinh A, Liu J, Woodward J, et al. Association between periodontal pathogens and systemic disease. Biomed J 2019;42:27-35
  3. Stepanovska J, Matejka R, Rosina J, Bacakova L, Kolarova H. Treatments for enhancing the biocompatibility of titanium implants. Biomed Pap 2020;164:23-33
  4. McGinley EL, Coleman DC, Moran GP, Fleming GJP. Effects of surface finishing conditions on the biocompatibility of a nickel-chromium dental casting alloy. Dent Mater 2011;27:637-50
  5. Wang YX, Robertson JL, Spillman WB, Jr., Claus RO. Effects of the chemical structure and the surface properties of polymeric biomaterials on their biocompatibility. Pharm Res 2004;21:1362- 73
  6. Klausner LH, Cartwright CB, Charbeneau GT. Polished versus autoglazed porcelain surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:157-62
  7. Patterson CJ, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:402-6
  8. Rosenstiel SF, Baiker MA, Johnston WM. Comparison of glazed and polished dental porcelain. Int J Prosthodont 1989;2:524-9. 9. al-Wahadni A, Martin DM. Glazing and finishing dental porcelain: a literature review. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64:580-3
  9. Al-Marzok MI, Al-Azzawi HJ. The effect of the surface roughness of porcelain on the adhesion of oral Streptococcus mutans. J Contemp Dent Pract 2009;10:17-24
  10. Sarac D, Sarac YS, Yuzbasioglu E, Bal S. The effects of porcelain polishing systems on the color and surface texture of feldspathic porcelain. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:122-8
  11. Ferruzzi F, Ferrairo BM, Piras FF, Borges AFS, Rubo JH. Fatigue survival and damage modes of lithium disilicate and resin nanoceramic crowns. J Appl Oral Sci 2019;27:1-10 13. Scribante A, Bollardi M, Chiesa M, Poggio C, Colombo M. Flexural properties and elastic modulus of different esthetic restorative materials: evaluation after exposure to acidic drink. Biomed Res Int 2019;1:1-8 14. Najeeb S, Khurshid Z, Zafar MS, Khan AS, Zohaib S, Marti JMN, Saure S, Matinlinna Jp, Rehman IU. Modifications in glass ionomer cements: nanosized fillers and bioactive nanoceramics. Int J Mol Sci 2016;17:1-14 15. Spitznagel FA, Boldt J, Gierthmuehlen PC. CAD/CAM ceramic restorative materials for natural teeth. J Dent Res 2018;97:1082-91
  12. Gonulol N,