Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

APPROACHES AND ATTITUDES OF TURKISH DENTISTS IN CASES OF CONGENITAL PERMANENT TOOTH AGENESIS

TÜRKİYE’DEKİ DİŞ HEKİMLERİNİN KONJENİTAL DAİMİ DİŞ EKSİKLİĞİNDE TEDAVİ YAKLAŞIMI ve TUTUMU

Pages
579–585
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As the participants are deciding to treatment planning about congenital permanent tooth agenesis, they took into account the factors of function of the tooth (78.1%) and short period of time (0.6%) much more and less, respectively.Conclusion: Education in Turkey related to congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not enough and the dental practitioners need more practical and theoretical training on this subject.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Although the etiology of congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not known entirely, it is thought that it is due to genetic and environmental factors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 244 dentists who were reached via social media (facebook, instagram, e-mail) were included in our study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As the participants are deciding to treatment planning about congenital permanent tooth agenesis, they took into account the factors of function of the tooth (78.1%) and short period of time (0.6%) much more and less, respectively.Conclusion: Education in Turkey related to congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not enough and the dental practitioners need more practical and theoretical training on this subject.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Although the etiology of congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not known entirely, it is thought that it is due to genetic and environmental factors. It is known that tooth aganesis causes chewing, speech, nutrition, aesthetic and psychological problems. The purpose of this study was to assess the knowledge and behaviour of the dental practitioners working in Turkey about congenital permanenttooth agenesis; and to improve cognizance for the treatment. Materials and Methods: 244 dentists who were reached via social media (facebook, instagram, e-mail) were included in our study. The questionnaire which include 13 questions was sent to dental practitioners.In the first part, the demographical data were asked. In the second part, general approaches of dental practitioners about congenital permanent tooth agenesis were asked, too. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Chi-square test. Results: While 52.5% of the dental practitioners who participated in this cross-sectional study stated that they had sufficient information about congenital tooth deficiency, 47.5% thought that they did not have enough information. As the participants are deciding to treatment planning about congenital permanent tooth agenesis, they took into account the factors of function of the tooth (78.1%) and short period of time (0.6%) much more and less, respectively.Conclusion: Education in Turkey related to congenital permanent tooth agenesis is not enough and the dental practitioners need more practical and theoretical training on this subject.

Özet

Amaç: Konjenital daimi diş eksikliğinin etiyolojisi tam olarak bilinmemekle birlikte genetik ve çevresel faktörlerden kaynaklandığı düşünülmektedir. Diş eksikliğinin çiğneme, konuşma, beslenme, estetik ve psikolojik sorunlara yol açtığı bilinmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı Türkiye’de çalışan diş hekimlerinin konjenital daimi diş eksikliği konusunda bilgi ve tutumlarının değerlendirilmesi ve tedavi farkındalığının artırılmasıdır.Materyal ve Metot: Çalışmamıza sosyal medya üzerinden (facebook, instagram, e-mail) ulaşılan Türkiye’de çalışan 244 diş hekimi dahil edildi. 13 soruyu içeren anket formu diş hekimlerine gönderildi. Birinci bölümde demografik veriler soruldu. İkinci bölümde ise diş hekimlerine konjenital daimi diş eksikliği konusunda genel yaklaĢımları hakkında sorular soruldu. Veriler tanımlayıcı istatistikler ve Ki-kare testi ile analiz edildi.Bulgular: Bu kesitsel çalışmaya katılan diş hekimlerinin %52,5’i konjenital daimi diş eksikliği konusunda yeterli bilgiye sahip olduklarını belirtmişken, %47,5’i yeterli bilgiye sahip olmadıklarını düĢünmüĢtür. Çalışmaya katılanların konjenital daimi diş eksikliğinde tedavi planlamasını yaparken sırasıyla %78,1’i dişin fonksiyon görmesine ve %0,6’sı işlemin kısa sürmesine göre karar vermiştir.Sonuç: Türkiye’de diş hekimlerinin konjenital daimi diş eksikliğine ilişkin eğitimi yeterli olmayıp, diş hekimlerinin bu konuda daha fazla pratik ve teorik eğitime ihtiyacı vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

HATİPOĞLU, Ö., TEMUR, K. T., SOĞUKPINAR, A. (2022). APPROACHES AND ATTITUDES OF TURKISH DENTISTS IN CASES OF CONGENITAL PERMANENT TOOTH AGENESIS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 579–585. https://ajindex.com/articles/451677

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Küchler EC, Risso PA, Costa Mde C, Modesto A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a large group of scholl children. Arch Oral Biol 2008; 53: 941-6
  2. Borie E, Fuentes R, Beltran V. Multiple tooth agenesis in nonsyndromic patient: a rare case report. Int J Morphol 2012; 30:634- 6
  3. Sökücü O, Ünal M, Topcuoğlu T, ÖztaĢ N. Çocuklarda daimi dentisyonda hipodonti görülme sıklığı. G Ü DiĢ Hek Fak Derg 2009; 26:33-7
  4. Cunha AS, dos Santos LV, Marañón-Vásquez GA, et al. Genetic variants in tooth agenesis–related genes might be also involved in tooth size variations. Clin Oral Invest 2020. https://doi. org/10.1007/s00784-020-03437-8
  5. De Coster P, Marks L, Martens L, Huysseune A. Dental agenesis: genetic and clinical perspectives. J Oral Pathol Med 2009; 38:1-17
  6. Parkin N, Elcock C, Smith R, Griffin R, Brook A. The aetiology of hypodontia: the prevalence, severity and location of hypodontia within families. Arch Oral Biol 2009; 54:52-6
  7. Vieira AR, D’Souza RN, Mues G, Deeley K, Hsin H-Y, Küchler EC, et al. Candidate gene studies in hypodontia suggest role for FGF3. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2013; 14:405-10
  8. Creton MA, Cune MS, Verhoeven W. Patterns of missing teeth in a population of oligodontia patients. Int J Prosthodont 2007; 20:409-13
  9. Ponduri S, Birnie DJ, Sandy JR. Infraocclusion of secondary deciduous molars-an unusual outcome. J Orthod 2009; 36:186-9
  10. Sabri R. Management of congenitally missing second pemolars with orthodontics and singletooth implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004; 125:634-42
  11. Kokich VG, Kokich VO. Congenitally missing mandibular second premolars: clinical options Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006; 130:437-44
  12. Kokich VG. Early Management of Congenitally Missing Teeth. Semin Orthod 2005; 11:146-51
  13. Dhanrajani PJ. Hypodontia: etiology, clinical features, and management. Quintessence Int 2002; 33:294-302
  14. Kılınç DG, Sevinç N. Erken yaĢta tespit edilen iki oligodonti olgusu. Türkiye Klinikleri J Dent Sci 2012; 18:126-30
  15. Gambetta-Tessini K, Mariño R, Morgan M, Evans W, Anderson V. Stress and health-promoting attributes in Australian, New Zealand, and Chilean dental students. J Dent Educ 2013; 77:801-9
  16. Kılıçoğ lu H, Gümrü AD, Ġnal I. Ġstanbul ilinde serbest çalış an diş hekimlerin in koruyucu ve önleyici tedavi uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Türk Ortodonti Derg 2004; 17:312-22
  17. Öz E, Kırzıoğlu Z. Mezuniyet sonrası diĢ hekimlerinin pedodontik tedavilere yaklaĢımları. Balıkesir