Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Pages
167–173
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the recent spread of implant treatments has led to the use of CBCT for implant planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Recent researches provided an overview for advantages, disadvantages and indications/contraindicationsof Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as well as some thoughts on the current educational status of CBCT in dental schools.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of present study is to find out the indications and the most frequently used ones by reviewing the indications of CBCT at Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) clinic, which were referred by other clinics/departments of the hospital.Materials and Method:1590 CBCT indications defined from 1503 patients and their reports retrieved from the archieves of the DMFR clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the recent spread of implant treatments has led to the use of CBCT for implant planning.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Recent researches provided an overview for advantages, disadvantages and indications/contraindicationsof Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) as well as some thoughts on the current educational status of CBCT in dental schools. Reviews of recent publications reveal that CBCT is an important tool in the diagnostic process, even it plays an integral role intreatment planning and outcome assessment at different departments like maxillofacial surgery, orthodontics, periodontology and endodontics. The aim of present study is to find out the indications and the most frequently used ones by reviewing the indications of CBCT at Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) clinic, which were referred by other clinics/departments of the hospital.Materials and Method:1590 CBCT indications defined from 1503 patients and their reports retrieved from the archieves of the DMFR clinic. Besides; referral reports, and Field of View (FOV-region) were also noted. Results:CBCT imaging has mostly focused on applications for dental implant planning, impacted tooth extraction, orthodontic purposes and temporomandibular joint imaging. Conclusion:CBCT is a 3D diagnostic tool contributing additional information to the clinical situation if the appropriate indication is used with the right FOV selection. In addition, the recent spread of implant treatments has led to the use of CBCT for implant planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

ORHAN, K., EREN, H., İNCEOĞLU, B., BÜYÜKKOÇAK, B. K., EREN, İ. (2022). EVALUATION OF REFERRAL OF CONE-BEAM CT INVESTIGATIONS AT A DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY CLINIC OF UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 167–173. https://ajindex.com/articles/451667

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Park JB.The evaluation of digital panoramic radiographs taken for implant dentistry in the daily practice.Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal2010
  2. 663–6. 2.Rushton VE, Horner K, Worthington HV.The quality of panoramic radiographs in a sample of general dental practices.Br Dent J1999
  3. 630–3. 3.Mayil M, Keser G, Namdar Pekiner F. CBCT Images of Anatomic Landmarks in Maxillofacial Region MÜSBED 2014
  4. Shetty H, Hegde P, Shetty A, Hegde MN. CBCT Imaging-The Dentists Third Eye: A Literature Based Review.Indian J Stomatology2014
  5. Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry.J IstanbulUniv Fac Dent2017
  6. 102–21. 6.Krishnamoorthy B, Mamatha N, Kumar VA. TMJ imaging by CBCT: Current scenario.Ann Maxillofac Surg2013
  7. 80–3. 7.Schegerer A, Lechel U, Ritter M, Weisser G, Fink C, Brix G.Dose and Image Quality of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography as Compared With Conventional Multislice Computed Tomography in Abdominal Imaging. Investigative Radiology. 2014
  8. 675–84. 8.Jaju PP, Jaju SP. Clinical utility of dental cone-beam computed tomography: current perspectives.Clin Cosmet Investig Dent2014
  9. 29–43. 9.Adibi S, Zhang W, Servos T, O’Neill PN. Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Dentistry: What Dental Educators and Learners Should Know. J Dent Educ 2012
  10. Carter JB, Stone, Clark RS, Mercer JE. Applications of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: An Overview of Published Indications and Clinical Usage in United States Academic Centers and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Practices. J Oral Maxillofac Surg2016
  11. Temur KT, Hatipoglu O. Awareness And Use Of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Of Turkish Dentist. Atatürk ÜnivDiĢ Hek FakDerg 2019
  12. Stratemann SA, Huang JC, Maki K, et al. Comparison ofcone beam computed tomography imaging with physicalmeasures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol2008
  13. Eggers G, Klein J, Welzel T, et al. Geometric accuracy of digital volume tomography and conventional computed tomography. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg2008
  14. Stuck BA, Hulse R, Barth TJ. Intraoperative cone beamcomputed tomography in the management of facial fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012
  15. Tsapaki V,Radiation protectionin dental radiology -Recent advances and future directions. Phys Med2017 Dec
  16. European Commission. European Guidelines on Radiation Protection in Dental Radiology
  17. Radiation Protection, Luxembourg