Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

BIOLOGICAL FEATURES AND CLINICAL USE OF AUTOGENOUS TOOTH BONE GRAFT

OTOJEN DİŞ KEMİK GREFTİNİN BİYOLOJİK ÖZELLİKLERİ VE KLİNİK KULLANIMI

Pages
659–670
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review provides knowledge on autogenous tooth bone grafts that may serve as a better alternative to conventional bone graft materials.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The studies focus on new bone grafts which as an alternative of allograft, xenograft and synthetic bone graft and, have a similar bone regeneration capacity with autogenous bone grafts.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hydroxyapatite crystals, which make up a large percentage of the inorganic structure, give the tissue durability and provide new bone tissue formation withthe organic structure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review provides knowledge on autogenous tooth bone grafts that may serve as a better alternative to conventional bone graft materials.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The studies focus on new bone grafts which as an alternative of allograft, xenograft and synthetic bone graft and, have a similar bone regeneration capacity with autogenous bone grafts. Autogenous tooth bone grafts are materials whose physical and biological structure is similar that of the bone tissue. This graft has two components, inorganic and organic. Organic structure that includes bone morphogenetic proteins, collagen and non-collagen proteins act as a scaffold for the formation of the inorganic structure. Hydroxyapatite crystals, which make up a large percentage of the inorganic structure, give the tissue durability and provide new bone tissue formation withthe organic structure. This review provides knowledge on autogenous tooth bone grafts that may serve as a better alternative to conventional bone graft materials.

Özet

Kemik dokunun tamiri ve yenilenmesinde, allogreft, ksenogreft ve sentetik kemik greftlerinin eksikliklerinin üstesinden gelebilecek ve otojen kemik greftlerine benzer kemik rejenerasyon kapasitesine sahip yeni materyaller geliştirmek için çalışmalar devam etmektedir. Otojen diş kemik greftleri, fiziksel ve biyolojik yapısı kemik doku ile benzer olan bir materyaldir. Bu greft, inorganik ve organik olmak üzere iki bileşene sahiptir. Organik yapı içerisinde yer alan kemik morfogenetik proteinleri, kollajen ve kollajen olmayan proteinler ile inorganik yapının oluşumunda bir iskelet görevi görür. İnorganik yapının büyük bir yüzdesini oluşturan hidroksiapatit kristalleri dokuya dayanıklılık kazandırır veorganik yapı ile birlikte yeni kemik doku oluşumunu sağlar. Bu derleme, geleneksel kemik greft materyallerine göre daha iyi bir alternatif olarak hizmet edebileceği düşünülen otojen dişkemik greftleri hakkında bilgi sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, G., GÜNBAY, T., KOYUNCU, B. Ö., BECERİK, S. Ç. (2022). BIOLOGICAL FEATURES AND CLINICAL USE OF AUTOGENOUS TOOTH BONE GRAFT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 659–670. https://ajindex.com/articles/451664

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Bhatt RA, Rozental TD. Bone graft substitutes. Hand Clinic. 2012; 28: 457-68
  2. Köse Hİ, Özden B. Ağız ve çene cerrahisinde periosteumun greft olarak kullanımı: literatür derlemesi. Atatürk Uni Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016; 16: 137- 40
  3. Chiarello E, Cadossi M, Tedesco G, Capra P. Autograft, allograft and bone substitutes in reconstructive orthopedic surgery. Aging Clin Exp Res 2013; 25: 101-3
  4. Khan SN, Cammisa JFP, Sandhu HS, Diwan AD, Girardi FP, Lane JM. The biology of bone grafting. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2005; 13: 77-86
  5. Sukumar S, Drizhal I. Bone grafts in periodontal therapy. Acta Medica 2008; 51: 203-7
  6. Şençimen M, Gülses A, Varol A, Okçu KM, Bayar GR. Mandibuler simfiz bölgesinden kemik grefti alınmasına yönelik iki basit cerrahi teknik. J Dent Fac Atatürk Uni 2010; 3: 12-6
  7. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. The efficacy of horizontal and vertical ridge augmentation procedures for dental implants. a cochrane systematic review. Eur J Oral Implantol 2009; 2; 167-84
  8. Chiapasco M, Casentini P, Zaniboni M. Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009; 24: 237-59
  9. Kim YK, Kim SG, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Um IU, Lim SC, Kim SY. Development of a novel bone grafting material using autogenous teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 109: 496-503
  10. Buser D. 20 years of guided bone regeneration in implant dentistry. 2th. New Malden: Surrey: Quintessence Publishing; 2010. p.1-15
  11. White DJ. The application of in vitro models to research on demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Adv Dent Res 1995; 9: 175-93
  12. Jones SJ, Boyde A. Ultrastructure of dentin and dentinogenesis. In: Linde A. editor. Dentin and dentinogenesis. 2th. Boca Raton: Florida: CRC Press; 1984. p. 81-134
  13. Goldberg M, Kulkarni AB, Young M, Boskey A. Dentin: structure, composition and mineralization. Front Biosci (Elite ed.); 2011; 3: 711-35
  14. He L, Hao Y, Zhena L, Liu H, Shao M, Xua X, Liang K, Gao Y, Yuan H, Li J, Li J, Cheng L, van Loveren C. Biomineralization of dentin. J Struct Biol 2019; 207: 115-22
  15. Okamoto M, Takahashi Y, Komichi S, Ali M, Yoneda N, Ishimoto T, Nakano T, Hayashi M.Novel evaluation method of dentin repair by direct pulp capping using high-resolution micro-computed tomography. Clin Oral Investig 2018; 22: 2879-87
  16. Cao CY, Mei ML, Li QL, Lo EC, Chu CH. Methods for biomimetic remineralization of human dentine: a systematic