Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

SURFACE MICROHARDNESS AND ROUGHNESS PROPERTIES OF BIODENTINE FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH VARIOUS ENDODONTIC IRRIGANTS

Pages
242–246
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, in clinical situations, such as perforation repair with Biodentine, use of EDTA and ozonated water may be preferred.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim:Endodontic irrigants may be used during a second-visit treatment or retreatment of root canals with perforations requiring repair biomaterials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods:Fifty Biodentine specimens were prepared and randomly divided into five groups, with 10 samples in each group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, in clinical situations, such as perforation repair with Biodentine, use of EDTA and ozonated water may be preferred.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:10 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim:Endodontic irrigants may be used during a second-visit treatment or retreatment of root canals with perforations requiring repair biomaterials. After a final flushing with a chemical irrigant, some solution may remain in the root canal space, which can affect the surface of the biomaterial, altering its properties and roughness.The present study aimed to evaluatethe effect of various irrigating solutions on surface microhardness and roughness of Biodentine (Septodont, Saint Maur des Fosses, France). Materials and Methods:Fifty Biodentine specimens were prepared and randomly divided into five groups, with 10 samples in each group. The specimens were then stored in different solutions for 5 min: distilled water (control), 5.25%sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) solution, 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), or ozonated water. Surface microhardness (Vickers hardness number [VHN]) and surface roughness were evaluated using 2-D profilometry. The data were analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests. The significance level was set at P < 0.05. Results:The VHN of specimens exposed to NaOCl and CHX was significantly lower than the VHN of specimens exposed to distilled water and EDTA (p < 0.001, p = 0.003, p = 0.001, and p = 0.006, respectively). There was no so significant difference in the mean VHN of the EDTA-treated specimens versus that of the control samples (p = 0.999). Regarding the surface roughness of Biodentine, there were no significant differences between irrigation solutions (2 = 4.243; p = 0.374). Conclusions:Exposure to all the irrigation solutions, except EDTA and ozonated water had an adverse effect on surface microhardness of Biodentine, whereas none of the irrigation solutions significantly changed surface roughness. Therefore, in clinical situations, such as perforation repair with Biodentine, use of EDTA and ozonated water may be preferred.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİR, P., ÖZMEN, B., ERŞAHAN, Ş., YILDIRIM, C., AKGÜN, Ö. M., BAŞAK, F., TEKELİ, S. (2022). SURFACE MICROHARDNESS AND ROUGHNESS PROPERTIES OF BIODENTINE FOLLOWING TREATMENT WITH VARIOUS ENDODONTIC IRRIGANTS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 242–246. https://ajindex.com/articles/451647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ingle JI, Simon JH, Machtou P, Bogaerts P. Outcome of endodontic treatment and re- treatment. In: Ingle JI, Backland LK, editors. Endodontics, 5th ed. Hamilton, London; BC Decker Inc: 2002. p. 753–5
  2. Bryan EB, Wollard G, Mitchell WC. Nonsurgical repair of furcal perforations: a literature review. Gen Dent 1999;47:274–80
  3. Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review— part III: clinical applications, drawbacks, and mechanism of action. J Endod 2010;36:400–13
  4. Han L, Okiji T. Uptake of calcium and silicon released from calcium silicate-based endodontic materials into root canal dentine. Int Endod J 2011;44:1081–7
  5. Koubi G, Colon P, Franquin JC, Hartmann A, Richard G, Faure MO, Lamber G. Clinical evaluation of the performance and safety of a new dentine substitute, biodentine, in the restoration of posterior teeth — A prospective study. Clin Oral Investig 2013;17:243–9
  6. Laurent P, Camps J, About I. Biodentine(TM) induces TGF-ß1 release from human pulp cells and early dental pulp mineralization. Int Endod J 2012;45:439–48
  7. Ballester-Palacios ML, Berástegui-Jimeno EM, Parellada-Esquius N, Canalda-Sahli C. Interfero- metric microscopy study ofthe surface roughness of Portland cement under the actionof different irrigants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2013; 18:817-21
  8. Smith JB, Loushine RJ, Weller RN, Rueggeberg FA, Whitford GM, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Metrologic Evaluation of the Surface of White MTA After the Use of Two Endodontic Irrigants. J Endod 2007;33:463-7
  9. Nekoofar MH, Adusei G, Sheykhrezae MS, Hayes SJ, Bryant ST, Dummer PM. The effect of condensation pressure on selected physical properties of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2007;40:453–61
  10. Nekoofar MH, Aseeley Z, Dummer PM. The effect of various mixing techniques on the surface microhardness of mineral trioxide aggregate. Int Endod J 2010;43:312-20
  11. Lee YL, Lee BS, Lin FH, Yun Lin A, Lan WH, Lin CP. Effects of physiological environments on the hydration behavior of mineral trioxide aggregate. Biomaterials 2004;25:787–93
  12. Antonijević D, Milovanović P, Riedel C, Hahn M, Amling M, Busse B, Djurić M. Application of reference point indentation for micromechanical surface characterization of calcium silicate based dental materials. Biomed Microdevices 2016;18:25
  13. Aggarwal V, Jain A, Kabi D. In vitro evaluation of effect of various endodontic solutions on selected physical properties of white mineral trioxide aggregat