SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFET OF REMOVABLE RETAINERS ON TOOTH MOBILITY AFTER ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT

ORTODONTİK TEDAVİ SONRASI FARKLI HAREKETLİ RETANSİYON APAREYLERİNİN MOBİLİTE ÜZERİNE ETKİSİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Nur BALCI
Hilal USLU TOYGAR
Beyza KIRÇELLİ
Pages
175–181
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: The initial measurement, 2nd, 3rd and 6th months mobility levels of the Hawley group were statistically significantly higher than the Essix group(p 0.05) whereas there was a statistically significant decrease in the measurements of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In orthodontic tooth movement, significant physiological alterations in the periodontal ligament and underlying alveolar bone are frequently observed states.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Method: A total of 45 participants, 29 Hawley appliances used and 16 Essix appliance used, were included in this study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: The initial measurement, 2nd, 3rd and 6th months mobility levels of the Hawley group were statistically significantly higher than the Essix group(p 0.05) whereas there was a statistically significant decrease in the measurements of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: In orthodontic tooth movement, significant physiological alterations in the periodontal ligament and underlying alveolar bone are frequently observed states. Tooth mobility has been used as an important indicator in the assessment of biomechanical characteristics of the periodontium and the availability of periodontal support throughout orthodontic treatment. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of Hawley and Essix appliances used for orthodontic retention on tooth mobility over time and to evaluate their clinical efficacy. Materials and Method: A total of 45 participants, 29 Hawley appliances used and 16 Essix appliance used, were included in this study. For each subject, the mobility of teeth on both arches was measured immediately (initial measurement) after orthodontic treatment and during retention (1st week, 1st, 2nd, 3,6th, 9th and 12th months) by use of Periotest. Results: The initial measurement, 2nd, 3rd and 6th months mobility levels of the Hawley group were statistically significantly higher than the Essix group(p 0.05) whereas there was a statistically significant decrease in the measurements of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 9th and 12th months (p

Özet

Giriş: Ortodontik tedavideki diş hareketleri esnasında gerek periodontal ligamentte (PDL) gerekse PDL’ye komşu kemikduvarında önemli fizyolojik değişiklikler meydana gelmektedir. Diş mobilitesi hem ortodontik tedavi boyunca hem de retansiyondöneminde periodonsiyumun biyomekanik özelliklerinin ve periodontal desteğin mevcudiyetinin değerlendirilmesinde önemli birgösterge olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, ortodontik retansiyon amacı ile kullanılan Hawley ve Essix apareylerininmobilite üzerine etkisini zamana bağlı karşılaştırmalı olarak incelemek ve bu apareylerin klinik yararlanımlarını değerlendirmektir.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamıza sabit ortodontik tedavi sonrası retansiyon döneminde Hawley apareyi kullanan 29 ve Essixapareyi kullanan 16 olmak üzere toplam 45 (35 kadın,10 erkek) katılımcı dahil edilmiştir. Diş mobilite ölçümleri braketlersöküldükten hemen sonra (ilk ölçüm) ve sonrasında 1.hafta,1.,2.,3,6.,9, ve 12. aylarda olacak şekilde Periotest cihazınınüreticinin talimatlarına göre kullanılması ile yapılmıştır.Bulgular: Gruplar arası zamana bağlı Periotest değerleri karşılaştırıldığında Hawley grubunun ilk ölçüm, 2.ay, 3. ay ve 6. aymobilite düzeylerinin Essix grubuna göre istatistiksel olarak anlamlı düzeyde yüksek olduğu bulunmuştur (p0.05); ilk ölçüme göre 1. ay, 2. ay, 3. ay, 6. ay, 9. ay ve 12. ay ölçümlerinde görülendüşüşler istatistiksel olarak ileri düzeyde anlamlı bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

BALCI, N., TOYGAR, H. U., KIRÇELLİ, B. (2022). INVESTIGATION OF THE EFFET OF REMOVABLE RETAINERS ON TOOTH MOBILITY AFTER ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 175–181. https://ajindex.com/articles/451611

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Jumanca D, Gǎluşcan A, Podariu AC, Oancea R, Sava-Roşianu R, Popovici R. Assessing effectiveness of containment after fixed orthodontic treatment with periotest. Med Evoluat 2011;XVII:463-8
  2. Marakoğlu İ, Ataoğlu T, Doruk EC. Ortodontik Tedavide Periodontal Dokulardaki Değişiklikler ve Periodontal Hastalıklarda Ortodontik Girişimler. Cumhuriyet Dent J 1998;102-6
  3. Tanaka E, Ueki K, Kikuzaki M, Yamada E, Takeuchi M, Dalla- Bona D, Tanne K. Longitudinal measurements of tooth mobility during orthodontic treatment using a periotest. Angle Orthod 2005; 75:101–5
  4. Konermann A, Al-Malat R, Skupin J, Keilig L, Dirk C, Karanis R, Bourauel C, Jager A. In vivo determination of tooth mobility after fixed orthodontic appliance therapy with a novel intraoral measurement device. Clin Oral Investig 2017; 21:1283–9
  5. Tanne K, Yoshida S, Kawata T, Sasaki A, Knox J, Jones ML. An evaluation of the biomechanical response of the tooth and periodontium to orthodontic forces in adolescent and adult subjects. Br J Orthod 1998;25:109–15
  6. Tanne K, Inoue Y, Sakuda M. Biomechanical behavior of the periodontium before and after orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 1995; 65:123–8
  7. Degirmenci Z, Polat Ozsoy O. Sabit ortodontik tedavi sonrası retansiyon. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2009;12:83-90
  8. Joondeph DR. Orthodontics: Current principles and techniques. 4th ed. St Louis; CV Mosby: 2005. p. 1123-5 9. Blake M, Garvey MT. Rationale for retention following orthodontic treatment. J Can Dent Assoc 1998;64:640-3
  9. Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2007;132:730-7
  10. Kilic N, Oktay H, Ersoz M. Effects of force magnitude on relapse: an experimental study in rabbits. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2011;140:44–50
  11. Keilig L, Goedecke J, Bourauel C, Daratsianos N, Dirk C, Jager A, Konermann A. Increased tooth mobility after fixed orthodontic appliance treatment can be selectively utilized for case refinement via positioner therapy - a pilot study. BMC Oral Health 2020;20:114
  12. Yoshida N, Koga Y, Kobayashi K, Yamada Y, Yoneda T. A new method for qualitative and quantitative evaluation of tooth displacement under the application of orthodontic forces using magnetic sensors. Med Eng Phys 2000;22:293– 300 14. Proffit WR. Contemporary Orthodontics. 3 rd ed. St Louis; CV Mosby:2000.