Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED HYBRID PROSTHESES

İMPLANT DESTEKLİ HİBRİT PROTEZLERİN YAPIMINDA KULLANILAN MATERYALLER VE ÜRETİM YÖNTEMLERİ

Pages
305–315
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, following an evaluation, it was concluded that it is a type of prosthesis that should be approached with caution because of the long-term complications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this literature review was to analyze the literature on implant supported hybrid prostheses used for the patients cannot be treated by conventional methods or where intra-arch distance was not suitable for fixed prosthesis construction.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Moreover, evidence-based information on successful treatment of the methods and materials used for the fabrication of implant supported hybrid prostheses has been provided.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, following an evaluation, it was concluded that it is a type of prosthesis that should be approached with caution because of the long-term complications.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this literature review was to analyze the literature on implant supported hybrid prostheses used for the patients cannot be treated by conventional methods or where intra-arch distance was not suitable for fixed prosthesis construction. Moreover, evidence-based information on successful treatment of the methods and materials used for the fabrication of implant supported hybrid prostheses has been provided. The literature was searched for references to implant supported hybrid prosthesis treatment in Medline via PubMed. Hybrid implant prostheses are a good treatment alternative to conventional full prosthesis in terms of aesthetics and function when the articles reviewed were evaluated. However, following an evaluation, it was concluded that it is a type of prosthesis that should be approached with caution because of the long-term complications.

Özet

Bu derlemenin amacı, geleneksel yöntemle tedavi edilemeyen ya da interark mesafenin sabit protez yapımı için uygun olmadığıdurumlarda kullanılan implant destekli hibrit protezler, implant destekli hibrit protezlerin yapımında kullanılan materyaller,protezlerin üretim yöntemleri hakkında literatürlerin taranması ve başarılı bir tedavi için kanıta dayalı bilgi verilmesidir. Buçalışmada, implant destekli hibrit protezlerin tedavisinde kullanılan yöntem ve materyallerin değerlendirilebilmesi için PubMedaracılığı ile Medline veri tabanında literatür taraması yapılmıştır. İncelenen makaleler değerlendirildiğinde, implant destekli hibritprotezler ; estetik ve fonksiyon bakımından geleneksel tam protezlere iyi bir tedavi alternatifidir. Ancak değerlendirmeden sonrauzun dönem komplikasyonlarının fazla olması nedeniyle dikkatli yaklaşılması gereken bir protez türü olduğu sonucunaulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞ, N., EĞİLMEZ, F. (2022). METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF IMPLANT SUPPORTED HYBRID PROSTHESES. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 305–315. https://ajindex.com/articles/451602

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Karthigeyan S, Ali SA, Mohan K, Deivanai M. An organized start to implant-supported prosthesis. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:90-3
  2. Montero J, de Paula CM, Albaladejo A. The “Toronto prosthesis”, an appealing method for restoring patients candidates for hybrid overdentures: A case report. J Clin Exp Dent 2012;4:e309-12
  3. Steigmann M. Aesthetic flap design for correction of buccal fenestration defects. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2008;20:487-493; quiz 494
  4. Misch C. Contemporary implant dentistry, 3rd edn. St Louis, Missouri: Mosby Elsevier, 2008
  5. Özdoğan A, İncesu A. İmplant destekli hibrit protezler. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2016; 26: 366-9
  6. Thalji G, Bryington M, De Kok IJ, Cooper LF. Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dent Clin North Am 2014;58:207-25
  7. Hebel KS, Gajjar RC. Cement-retained versus screw-retained implant restorations: achieving optimal occlusion and esthetics in implant dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 1997;77:28-35
  8. Salenbauch NM, Langner J. New ways of designing suprastructures for fixed implant-supported prostheses. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 1998;18:604-12
  9. Balshi TJ. Preventing and resolving complications with osseointegrated implants. Dent Clin North Am 1989; 33:821-68
  10. Jain AR, Nallaswamy D, Padma Ariga JMP. Full mouth rehabilitation of a patient with mandibular implant screw retained Fp-3 prosthesis opposing maxillary acrylic removable over-denture. Contemp Clin Dent 2013;4:231-5
  11. Real-Osuna J, Almendros-Marqués N, Gay-Escoda C. Prevalence of complications after the oral rehabilitation with implant-supported hybrid prostheses. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2012; 17: e116-21
  12. Gonzalez J. The evolution of dental materials for hybrid prosthesis. Open Dent J 2014;8:85-94
  13. Bural C, Geçkili O. Hibrit Protezler. Turkiye Klinikleri J Prosthodont 2015;1:45-52
  14. Egilmez F, Ergun G, Cekic-Nagas I, Bozkaya S. Implant-supported hybrid prosthesis. Conventional treatment method for borderline cases. Eur J Dent 2015;9:442-8
  15. Gallucci GO, Doughtie CB, Hwang JW, Fiorellini JP, Weber HP. Five‐year results of fixed implant‐supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:601-7
  16. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses. The Toronto Study. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17:417-24
  17. Patzelt SB, Bahat O, Reynolds MA, Strub JR. The all‐on‐four treatment concept: a systematic re