Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

APICAL ROOT RESORPTION IN TEETH AFTER THE TREATMENT OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION WITH FORSUS FRD AND FIXED TECHNIQUE

SINIF 2 MALOKLÜZYONLARIN FORSUS FRD VE SABİT TEKNİK İLE TEDAVİSİ SONRASINDA DİŞLERDE GELİŞEN APİKAL KÖK REZORPSİYONU

Pages
188–195
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

ARR was mild (90≤rRCR

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To assess apical root resorption (ARR) after Class II malocclusion treatment with the Forsus FRD and fixed technique andto identify the possible risk factors retrospectively.Material and Methods: Seventy-three Class II patients (52 females, 21 males; mean age 14.26±1.28 years) treated withForsus FRD and fixed technique in the department of Orthodontics were included in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The crown and root lengths of1368 teeth were measured from the panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning and the end of the treatment from thesepatients.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:ARR was mild (90≤rRCR
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To assess apical root resorption (ARR) after Class II malocclusion treatment with the Forsus FRD and fixed technique andto identify the possible risk factors retrospectively.Material and Methods: Seventy-three Class II patients (52 females, 21 males; mean age 14.26±1.28 years) treated withForsus FRD and fixed technique in the department of Orthodontics were included in this study. The crown and root lengths of1368 teeth were measured from the panoramic radiographs taken at the beginning and the end of the treatment from thesepatients. ARR was calculated as the root-crown ratio (RCR) and relative changes of RCR (rRCR). Apical displacement of theincisors was assessed by the superimposition of the lateral cephalograms taken at the beginning and the end of the treatment.Besides, the effect of age, gender, treatment period, tooth type, and apical displacement on ARR was evaluated. Data werestatistically analyzed.Results: ARR was detected in 66 (90.41%) patients and 228 (16.67%) teeth. ARR was mild (90≤rRCR

Özet

Amaç: Forsus FRD ve sabit teknik ile tedavi edilen Sınıf 2 maloklüzyonlarda, tedavi sonrası apikal kök rezorpsiyonunun (AKR) incelenmesi ve olası risk faktörlerinin retrospektif olarak tanımlanmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışmaya Ortodonti Anabilim Dalı’nda Forsus FRD ve sabit teknik ile tedavi edilmiş olan Sınıf 2 maloklüzyona sahip 73 hasta (52 kadın; 21 erkek; yaş ortalaması 14.26±1.28) dahil edildi. Bu hastaların, tedavi öncesinde ve tedavi sonrasında çekilen panoramik radyograflarından 1368 dişin, kron ve kök uzunlukları ölçüldü. AKR, kök-kron oranı (RCR) ve RCR’nin bağıl değişkenleri (rRCR) olarak hesaplandı. Tedavi öncesi ve tedavi sonrasında alınan lateral sefalogramların çakıştırılması ile kesici dişlerin apikal yöndeki yer değiştirmesi değerlendirildi. Bunlara ilave olarak, yaş, cinsiyet, tedavi süresi, diş tipi ve apikal yer değiştirmenin AKR’ye etkisi incelendi. Veriler istatistiksel olarak analiz edildi. Bulgular: Altmış altı hastada (%90.41) ve 228 dişte (%16.67) AKR saptandı. AKR, 181 (%13.23) dişte hafif (90≤rRCR

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, B. I., AKARSLAN, Z., KARADAĞ, Ö. (2022). APICAL ROOT RESORPTION IN TEETH AFTER THE TREATMENT OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION WITH FORSUS FRD AND FIXED TECHNIQUE. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 188–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/451571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Kolcuoğlu K, Oz AZ. Comparison of orthodontic root resorption of root-filled and vital teeth using microcomputed tomography. Angle Orthod 2020;90:56- 62. 2.Yıldırım M, Akın M. Comparison of root resorption after bone-borne and tooth-borne rapid maxillary expansion evaluated with the use of microtomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2019;155:182-90. 3.Pamukçu H, Polat-Özsoy Ö, Gülşahi A, Özemre MÖ. External apical root resorption after nonextraction orthodontic treatment with labial vs. lingual fixed appliances. J Orofac Orthop 2020;81:41-51. 4. Lund H, Gröndahl K, Hansen K, Gröndahl HG. Apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. A prospective study using cone beam CT. Angle Orthod 2012;82:480-7. 5. Linge L, Linge BO. Patient characteristics and treatment variables associated with apical root resorption during orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1991;99:35–43. 6. Mirabella AD, Artun J. Risk factors for apical root resorption of maxillary anterior teeth in adult orthodontic patients. Am J Orthod 1995;108:48– 55. 7. Blake M, Woodside DG, Pharoah MJ. A radiographic comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with the edgewise and speed appliances. Am J Orthod 1995;108:76–84. 8. Weltman B, Vig KW, Fields HW, Shanker S, Kaizar EE. Root resorption associated with orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2010;137:462–76. 9. Sameshima GT, Sinclair PM. Predicting and preventing root resorption: Part I. Diagnostic factors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001; 119: 505–10. 10. Kaley J, PhillipsC. Factors related to root resorption in edgewise practice. Angle Orthod 1991; 61:125-32. 11. Maués CP, do Nascimento RR, Vilella Ode V. Severe root resorption resulting from orthodontic treatment: prevalence and risk factors. Dental Press J Orthod 2015;20:52-8. 12. Fox N. Longer orthodontic treatment may result in greater external apical root resorption. Evid Based Dent 2005;6:21. 13. Samandara A, Papageorgiou SN, IoannidouMarathiotou I, Kavvadia-Tsatala S, Papadopoulos MA.Evaluation of orthodontically induced external root resorption following orthodontic treatment using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod 2019; 23;41:67-79. 14. Lupi JE, Handelman CS, Sadowsky C. Prevalence and severity of apical root resorption and alveolar bone loss in orthodontically treated adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1996;109:28–37. 15. Kim KW, Kim SJ, Lee JY, Choi YJ,