Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

COMPARISON OF BONDING PROPERTIES AND QUALITY OF A NEW NON-LIGHT POLYMERIZING UNIVERSAL BOND WITH OTHER ÜNIVERSAL BONDS BY SHEAR AND FTIR METHODS

YENİ IŞIKSIZ SERTLEŞEN ÜNİVERSAL BONDUN DİĞER ÜNİVERSAL BONDLARLA BAĞLANMA ÖZELLİKLERİ VE KALİTELERİNİN MAKASLAMA VE FTIR YÖNTEMİYLE KARŞILAŞTIRILMASI

Pages
535–541
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results: Significant differences were found between different adhesives as a result of shear bond strength test (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Conservative dentistry has begun to develop with the preference of dental color restorative materials compared to other restorative materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In our study, FTIR analysis test was used to determine the infiltrations of the bonding agents and shear bond test was used to evaluate strength of the adhesive agents while bonding to the dentin. 110 samples were used for each test.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results: Significant differences were found between different adhesives as a result of shear bond strength test (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:110 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: Conservative dentistry has begun to develop with the preference of dental color restorative materials compared to other restorative materials. With the continuous development of conservative dentistry, adhesive technology has become even more important. Universal or multimodal adhesives are recent innovations in adhesive dentistry. These materials simplify the application by collecting all components in a single bottle. The aim of this study is to evaluate the quality of bonding of a new bonding agent, which has been recently introduced to the market, that offers less technical precision and less application time, compared to other universal bonding agents commonly used in clinics. Materials and Methods: In our study, FTIR analysis test was used to determine the infiltrations of the bonding agents and shear bond test was used to evaluate strength of the adhesive agents while bonding to the dentin. 110 samples were used for each test. Ten of them were sorted for the control group. The remaining 100 were equally divided into two groups for self etch and total etch modes. Each group was divided into 5 groups to apply 5 different bonding agents and each group was consisted of 10 samples. After adjusting the groups, shear bond strength and FTIR analysis tests were performed on dentin. One Way ANOVA (One Way Anova) was used to determine the difference between the data obtained from the shear test and FTIR analysis test. Duncan, Kruskall-Wallis and Mann-Whitney methods were used to compare the samples in each other. Spearman analysis was used to compare FTIR and shear bond strengths. Results: Significant differences were found between different adhesives as a result of shear bond strength test (p

Özet

Amaç: Konservatif diş hekimliğinde yapılan araştırmalar ve bunun sonucunda elde edilen bulgularla adezyon önem kazanmıştır. Üniversal veya multi-mod adezivler, adezyon konusunda son zamanlarda üzerine düşülen materyallerdir. Bu materyaller bütün komponentleri tek bir şişede toplayarak uygulamayı basitleştirmişlerdir. Bu çalışmanın amacı piyasaya yeni sürülmüş olan ışık kullanma süresini pas geçerek kendiliğinden polimerize olan üniversal bonding ajanın bağlanım kalitesini kliniklerde sıkça kullanılan diğer üniversal bonding ajanlarla makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi ve FTIR yöntemleriyle kıyaslayarak değerlendirilmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmamızda bonding ajanların dentin bağlanma dayanımı belirlemek için makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi, infiltrasyonlarını kıyaslamak için FTIR analiz testi yapıldı. Her test için 110 örnek kullanıldı. Bunların 10 tanesi kontrol grubu için ayrıldı. Kalan 100 tanesi self etch ve total etch asitleme modları için eşit olarak iki gruba ayrıldı. Her grup da kendi içinde n=10 olmak üzere 5 farklı bonding ajan uygulanmak üzere 5 gruba ayrıldı. Gruplar ayarlandıktan sonra dentin üzerinde makaslama bağlanma dayanımı ve FTIR analiz testleri yapıldı. Makaslama testi ve FTIR analiz testi sonucunda elde edilen verilerin arasındaki farklılığın belirlenmesi amacıyla tek yönlü varyans analizi (One Way Anova) yapıldı. Örneklerin kendi aralarında kıyaslanması için Duncan, Kruskall-Wallis ve Mann-Whitney yöntemleri kullanıldı. FTIR ve makaslama bağlanma dayanımlarını birbirleriyle karşılaştırmak için Spearman analizi kullanıldı. Bulgular: Makaslama bağlanma dayanımı testi sonucunda farklı adezivlerin arasında anlamlı farklar bulundu (p

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZATEŞ, M. E., YILDIZ, M. (2022). COMPARISON OF BONDING PROPERTIES AND QUALITY OF A NEW NON-LIGHT POLYMERIZING UNIVERSAL BOND WITH OTHER ÜNIVERSAL BONDS BY SHEAR AND FTIR METHODS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 535–541. https://ajindex.com/articles/451556

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Nguyen NT. Obturation of the root canal system. İn: Cohen S, Burns RC, eds. Pathways of the pulp. 6th ed. St. Louis; CV Mosby: 1998. p. 219-71
  2. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006;39:921-30
  3. Chandra BS, Gopıkrıshna V. Obturation of Radicular Space. Grossmans Endodontic Practice. 12th ed. New Delhi; Wolters kluwer: 2013. p. 278-300
  4. Petersson K, Petersson A, Olsson B, Hakansson J, Wennberg A. Technical quality of root fillings in an adult Swedish population. Endod Dent Traumatol 1986;2:99-102
  5. De Moor RJ, Hommez GM, De Boever JG, Delme KI, Martens GE. Periapical health related to the quality of root canal treatment in a Belgian population. Int Endod J 2000;33:113-20
  6. Boltacz-Rzepkowska E, Pawlicka H. Radiographic features and outcome of root canal treatment carried out in the Lodz region of Poland. Int Endod J 2003;36:27-32
  7. İlgüy D, İlgüy M, Fişekçioğlu E, Ersan N, Tanalp J, Dölekoğlu S. Assessment of root canal treatment outcomes performed by turkish dental students: results after two years. J Dent Ed 2013;77:502-50
  8. Kabak Y, Abbott PV. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and the quality of endodontic treatment in an adult Belarusian population. Int Endod J 2005;38:238-45
  9. Burke FM, Lynch CD, Ní Ríordáin R, Hannigan A. Technical quality of root canal fillings performed in a dental school and the associated retention of root-filled teeth: a clinical follow-up study over a 5- year period. J Oral Rehabil 2009;36:508-15
  10. Bhatt M, Coil J, Chehroudi B, Esteves A, Aleksejuniene J, MacDonald D. Clinical decisionmaking and importance of the AAE/AAOMR position statement for CBCT examination in endodontic cases. Int End J 2021;54:26-37
  11. MacDonald D. Cone‐beam computed tomography. In: D MacDonald, ed. Oral and Maxillofacial radiology: A Diagnostic Approach, 2nd ed. New jersey: Wiley Blackwell: 2020. p. 97‐ 100
  12. Hommez GM, Coppens CR, De Moor RJ. Periapical health related to the quality of coronal restorations and root fillings. Int Endod J 2002;35:680-9
  13. Buckley M, Spangberg LSW. The prevalence and technical quality of endodontic treatment in an American subpopulation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1995;79:92-100
  14. Mothanna K. AlRahabi. Technical quality assessment of root canal treatment performed by preclinical dental students at Taibah University. KSA J Taibah Univ Med Sci 2017; 12:2