Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

SCREW LOOSENING ON IMPLANT SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS

İMPLANT DESTEKLİ PROTEZLERDE VİDA GEVŞEMESİ

Pages
138–146
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, it is aimed to underline the importance of screw loosening in the implant supported prosthesis implementations, providing also the necessary information on the mechanism and the causes of this problem.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Implant-supported restoration is one of the most commonly used treatment procedures in the rehabilitation of missing teeth.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Due to its being a well-established procedure and high success rates, implant-supported restoration is gaining more attraction which also increased the rates of biological and mechanical complications in the implementations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, it is aimed to underline the importance of screw loosening in the implant supported prosthesis implementations, providing also the necessary information on the mechanism and the causes of this problem.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Implant-supported restoration is one of the most commonly used treatment procedures in the rehabilitation of missing teeth. Due to its being a well-established procedure and high success rates, implant-supported restoration is gaining more attraction which also increased the rates of biological and mechanical complications in the implementations. The mechanical complications are mostly related to the prosthetic superstructure and can be listed as abutment screw loosening, abutment screw fracture, substructure and implant fracture. Among these, it is known that the screw loosening is the most commonly encountered mechanical complications. In case undetected in clinical and/or radiographic examination, screw loosening can lead to the screw or implant fractures over time. The factors associated with the screw loosening problem are the preload, the settling effect, the type of implant-abutment connection, the type of restoration, parafunction and the existance of cantilever. In this review, it is aimed to underline the importance of screw loosening in the implant supported prosthesis implementations, providing also the necessary information on the mechanism and the causes of this problem.

Özet

Eksik dişlerin rehabilitasyonunda gün geçtikçe daha yaygın biçimde kullanılan tedavi prosedürlerinden biri de implant desteklirestorasyonlardır. Oldukça yüksek başarı oranları bulunan implant destekli restorasyonların kullanım sıklığı arttıkça meydanagelen biyolojik ve mekanik komplikasyon oranları da artmıştır. Meydana gelen mekanik komplikasyonlar daha çok protetik üstyapı ile ilgilidir ve abutment vidasının gevşemesi, abutment vida kırığı, altyapı ve implant kırığı gibi sıralanabilir. Yapılançalışmalarda en sık karşılaşılan mekanik komplikasyonlardan birinin ise vida gevşemesi olduğu belirtilmiştir. Meydana gelen vidagevşemesinin klinik ve radyografik olarak belirlenememesi ve bu sorunun giderilmemesi durumunda ise abutment vidasının veimplantın kırılması ile karşı karşıya kalınabilir. Abutment vidasının gevşemesinde; ön yük, yerleşme etkisi, implant abutmentbağlantı tipi, restorasyon tipi, parafonksiyon ve kantilever varlığı gibi faktörlerin etkili olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu derlemedeimplant destekli protezlerde meydana gelen vida gevşemesinin önemi, mekanizması ve nedenleri hakkında bilgi vermekamaçlanmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDOĞAN, H. G., YİĞİT, E. (2022). SCREW LOOSENING ON IMPLANT SUPPORTED PROSTHESIS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 138–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/451551

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms, J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 39–110
  2. Chang HS, Chen YC, Hsieh YD, Hsu ML. Stress distribution of two commercial dental implant systems: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Dent Sci 2013; 8: 261-71
  3. Prado CJ, Neves FD, Soares CJ, Dantas KA, Dantas TS, Naves LZ. Influence of abutment screw design and surface coating on the bending flexural strength of the implant set. J Oral Implantol 2014; 40:123–8
  4. Zembic A, Kim S, Zwahlen M, Kelly JR. Systematic review of the survival rate and incidence of biologic, technical, and esthetic complications of single implant abutments supporting fixed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014; 29:99–116
  5. Jung RE, Zembic A, Pjetursson BE, Zwahlen M, Thoma DS. Systematic review of the survival rate and the incidence of biological, technical, and aesthetic complications of single crowns on implants reported in longitudinal studies with a mean follow-up of 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:2–21
  6. Sailer I, Mühlemann S, Zwahlen M, Hämmerle CH, Schneider D. Cemented and screw retained implant reconstructions: a systematic review of the survival and complication rates. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012; 23:163–201
  7. Borie E, Orsi IA, de Araujo CP. The influence of the connection, length and diameter of an implant on bone biomechanics. Acta Odontol Scand 2015;73:321-9
  8. Krishnan V, Tony Thomas C, Sabu I. Management of abutment screw loosening: review of literatüre and report of a case. J Indian Prosthodont Soc 2014; 14:208-14
  9. Sailer I, Philipp A, Zembic A, et al. A systematic review of the performance of ceramic and metal implant abutments supporting fixed implant reconstructions. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009; 20:4–31
  10. Asvanund P, Cheepsathit L. Effect of different angulation angled abutment on screw loosening of implants under cyclic loading. M Dent J 2016;36:337–24
  11. Vetromilla BM, Brondani LP, Pereira-Cenci T, Bergoli CD. Influence of different implantabutment connection designs on the mechanical and biological behavior of single-tooth implants in the maxillary esthetic zone: A systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2019;121: 398-403
  12. Shin HM, Huh JB, Yun MJ, Jeon YC, Chang BM, Jeong CM. Influence of the implant-abutment connection design and diameter on the screw joint stability. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:126-32
  13. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:121