SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LIGHT-CURING UNITS ON THE MICROHARDNESS OF COLORED COMPOMERS

FARKLI IŞIK KAYNAKLARININ RENKLİ KOMPOMERLERİN MİKROSERTLİĞİ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Münevver KILIÇ
Gönül YETER
Pages
22–26
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Comparing the microhardness values of the compomers, the GC light curing unit was found to be statistically significantly lower than Valo unit (p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microhardness value of colored compomers polymerized by three light curing units.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: A2 glasiosite (Voco Germany), pink Twinky Star (Voco Germany), blue Twinky star (Voco Germany) branded compomers with a thickness of 5mm-2mm 72 samples were prepared.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Comparing the microhardness values of the compomers, the GC light curing unit was found to be statistically significantly lower than Valo unit (p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:72 samples
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this study was to compare the microhardness value of colored compomers polymerized by three light curing units. Material and Methods: A2 glasiosite (Voco Germany), pink Twinky Star (Voco Germany), blue Twinky star (Voco Germany) branded compomers with a thickness of 5mm-2mm 72 samples were prepared. Samples have been polymerized by light curing units by Valo Cordless (Ultradent – USA), D-Light Pro (GC – Germany) and Woodpecker (China). The hardness values of the samples have been measured by the Vickers microhardness device. Results: When assessing microhardness, there is no interaction between the colored compomer and light curing unit (p=0,104) (Univariate analysis, Two way ANOVA). Comparing the microhardness values of the compomers, the GC light curing unit was found to be statistically significantly lower than Valo unit (p

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı üç farklı ışık cihazı ile polimerize edilen renkli kompomerlerin yüzey sertlik değerini karşılaştırmaktır.Gereç ve yöntem: A2 glasiosite (Voco, Almanya), pembe Twinky Star (Voco, Almanya), mavi Twinky star (Voco Almanya)kullanılarak, 5mm-2mm kalınlığında 72 örnek hazırlanmıştır. Örnekler Valo Cordless (Ultradent – ABD), D-Light Pro (GC –Almanya) ve Woodpecker (Çin) ışık cihazları ile polimerize edilmiştir. Örneklerin yüzey sertlik değer ölçümleri Vickers mikrosertlikcihazı ile yapılmıştır.Bulgular: Yüzey sertliği değerlendirildiğinde kompomer rengi ve ışık cihazı arasında etkileşim bulunmamaktadır (p=0,104)(Univariate analysis, Two way anova). Kompomerlerin yüzey sertlik değerleri karşılaştırıldığında GC ışık cihazı Valo’danistatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede düşük bulunmuştur (p

🔖

Cite This Article

KILIÇ, M., YETER, G. (2022). THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT LIGHT-CURING UNITS ON THE MICROHARDNESS OF COLORED COMPOMERS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 22–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/451548

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Ehlers V, Gran K, Callaway A, Azrak B, Ernst C-P. One-year clinical performance of flowable bulk-fill composite vs. Conventional compomer restorations in primary molars. J Adhes Dent 2019; 21: 247-54
  2. Olegário IC, Hesse D, Mendes FM, Bonifácio CC, Raggio DP. Glass carbomer and compomer for art restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Invest 2019; 23: 1761-70
  3. Hugar SM, Kohli D, Badakar CM, Gokhale NS, Thakkar PJ, Mundada MV. An in vivo comparative evaluation of dental anxiety level and clinical success rate of composite and multicolored compomers in 6 to 12 years of children. International J Clin Pediatr Dent 2018, 11: 483
  4. Guler C, Keles A, Guler MS, Karagoz S, Cora ÖN, Keskin GJJOaB, Materials F. Thermal conductivity of different colored compomers. J Appl Biomater & Funct Mater 2017;15: e362-8
  5. Ruse ND. What is a" compomer"? J Canadian Dent Assoc 1999; 65: 500-4
  6. Hwang S-W, Kwon T-Y, Kim K-H, Kwon Y-H, Kim H, Lee J-B. Optical, mechanical and chemical properties of colored compomer. Biomed Res 2007, 11: 36-42
  7. Croll TP, Helpin ML, Donly KJ. Multi-colored dualcured compomer. Pediatr Dent 2004, 26: 273-6
  8. Behnaz E, Hengameh S, Assila V. Hardness evaluation of composite resins cured with qth and led. J Dent Rese Dent Clin Dent Prosp 2014; 4; 8: 40-4 9. Atabek D, Bodur H, Kalayci Ş, Tirali E. Conversion degrees of a colored compomer in different colors utilized by various curing times. J Dent Child 2011; 78: 83-7
  9. Salgado VE, Borba MM, Cavalcante LM, De Moraes RR, Schneider LF. Effect of photoinitiator combinations on hardness, depth of cure, and color of model resin composites. J Esthetic Res Dent 2015; 27: S41-8
  10. Lima RBW, Troconis CCM, Moreno MBP, Murillo‐Gómez F, De Goes MF. Depth of cure of bulk fill resin composites: A systematic review. J Esthetic Res Dent 2018; 30: 492-501
  11. Gan J, Yap A, Cheong J, Arista N, Tan C. Bulk-fill composites: Effectiveness of cure with poly-and monowave curing lights and modes. Oper Dent 2018; 43: 136-43
  12. Bakkal M, Yılmaz B, Durmus A, Durmus Z, Ozalp S. Polymerization characteristics of colored compomers cured with different led units. J Appl Biomater Func Mater 2019; 17:2280800019827805
  13. Gorken FN, Kuru S, Batu S, Guven Y, Sepet E. Compomers reinforced with bioactive glass and hydroxyapatite particles. Oral Health & Prev Dent 2018; 16: 431-8 15. Park S-H, Kim S-S, Cho Y-S, Lee S-Y, Noh B-D. Comparison of linear polymerization shrinkage and microhardne