Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2

BONDING STRENGTH TEST METHODS IN DENTISTRY

DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE KULLANILAN BAĞLANMA DAYANIMI TEST METOTLAR

Pages
283–288
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

When bonding strength test methods going to be used, tester should know and take care that standardization issue.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In today's dentistry, various methods have been developed to measure the amount of adhesive strength of materials.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Micro tensile and micro shear test can be more accurate but they have their disadvantage as they need more complicated testing setups and these testing methods have their weakness such as these tests hard to standardize.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:When bonding strength test methods going to be used, tester should know and take care that standardization issue.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In today's dentistry, various methods have been developed to measure the amount of adhesive strength of materials. Bonding strength test methods can be used for this commonly. There are many bonding strength test methods for evaluation. Each one of these methods have their advantages and disadvantages. Micro tensile and micro shear test can be more accurate but they have their disadvantage as they need more complicated testing setups and these testing methods have their weakness such as these tests hard to standardize. For this reason, it is diffucult to compare to bonding force between themselves. When bonding strength test methods going to be used, tester should know and take care that standardization issue.

Özet

Günümüz diş hekimliğinde, materyallerin yapışma kuvvetlerinin miktarını ölçmek için çeşitli metotlar geliştirilmiştir. Bağlanmadayanımı testleri bu amaç için yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Bununla birlikte birçok bağlanma dayanımı test metodu vardır. Buyöntemlerin her birinin avantajları ve dezavantajları vardır. Mikro çekme ve mikro makaslama testleri daha hassas sonuçlarverebilir, ancak daha karmaşık test kurulumlarına ihtiyaç duydukları için bazı dezavantajlar meydana gelmektedir ve bu testyöntemlerinde standardizasyonun sağlanması zordur. Bu nedenle bağlanma dayanım testlerinin kendi aralarında kıyaslanmasızordur. Bağlanma dayanımı test metotları kullanılırken, testi yapan kişinin test cihazlarının standardizasyonunu bilmesi vestandardizasyon sorunlarının çözümünü yapabilmesi gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELMAS, S., BAŞARAN, E. G., İZGİ, A. D. (2022). BONDING STRENGTH TEST METHODS IN DENTISTRY. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 2, 283–288. https://ajindex.com/articles/451543

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. David H. Pashley, Ricardo M, Carvalho, Hidehiko Sano, Masatosiii Nakajima, Masahiro Yoshiyama, YasuoSinono, Carios A. Fernandes, Franklin Tay. The microtensile bond test: a review. J Addesive Dent 1999; 1:299-309
  2. Choudhary K, Nandlal B. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of nano-hydroxyapatite incorporated glass ionomer cement and conventional glass ionomer cement on dense synthetic hydroxyapatite disk: An in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res 2015; 26:170-5
  3. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Shankar YR, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical review: Part I. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:305-11 4. Devatha AB, Lakshmi MN, Kumar NB, Erukala S, Valluri R, Ealla KKR. A comparative study of shear bond strength of direct bonding system with and without a liquid primer: an ın vitro study. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2019;11: 515-22
  4. Kansal R, Rani S, Kumar M, Kumar S, Issar G. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of newer resin cement (relyx ultimate and relyx u200) to lithium disilicate and zirconia ceramics as ınfluenced by thermocycling. Contemp Clin Dent 2018;9:601-6
  5. Technical specification ISO/TS 11405. Dental materials –testing of adhesion to tooth structure. Switzerland; 2003
  6. Inokoshi M, De Munck J, Minakuchi S, Van Meerbeek B. Meta-analysis of bonding effectiveness to zirconia ceramics. J Dent Res 2014; 93: 329-34
  7. Greig V. Craigs. Restorative dental materials. Br Dent J 2012; 213: 96-8
  8. Salz U, Bock T. Testing adhesion of direct restoratives to dental hard tissue - a review. J Adhes Dent 2010;12:343-71 10. Braga RR, Meira JB, Boaro LC, Xavier TA: Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of “macro” test methods. Dent Mater 2010; 26:38– 49
  9. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, et al: Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes, Dent Mater 2010; 26:100–21
  10. Sirisha K, Rambabu T, Ravishankar Y, Ravikumar P. Validity of bond strength tests: A critical reviewPart II. J Conserv Dent 2014;17:420-6 13. Drummond JL, Toepke TR, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999;107:220–4
  11. Otani A, Amaral M, May LG, Cesar PF, Valandro LF. A critical evaluation of bond strength tests for the assessment of bonding to Y-TZP. Dent Mater 2015; 31: 648-56
  12. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G. A critique of bond strength measurements. J Dent 1989; 17:61–7
  13. Kelly JR, Benetti P, Rungruanganunt P, Bona AD. The slippery slope: critical perspectives on in vitro re