SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELLA TURCICA BRIDGING AND MAXILLARY IMPACTED CANINES AND MAXILLARY PARAMETERS

SELLA TURSİKA KÖPRÜSÜ İLE ÜST GÖMÜLÜ KANİN VE MAKSİLLA ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Ahmet KARAMAN
Sanaz SADRY
Pages
515–521
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results were evaluated on the significance level of p

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the relationship between the cases of normal sella turcica, partial and total sella turcica bridging (STB) and unilaterally and bilaterally impacted canines and maxillary parameters.
📊
Key Findings & Data:A total of 260 patients (80 normal sella turcica,102 partial bridging and 78 total bridging cases) were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results were evaluated on the significance level of p
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the relationship between the cases of normal sella turcica, partial and total sella turcica bridging (STB) and unilaterally and bilaterally impacted canines and maxillary parameters. Material and Methods: The sample of the study was divided into three groups according to the calcification status of the sella turcica. A total of 260 patients (80 normal sella turcica,102 partial bridging and 78 total bridging cases) were included in the study. Maxillary cephalometric measurements were performed. The results were evaluated on the significance level of p

Özet

Amaç :Normal sella tursika, parsiyel ve tam sella tursika köprüsü (STB) ile tek taraflı ve bilateral üst gömülü kanin dişler ve maksilla arasındaki ilişkiyi değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışma sella tursikanın kalsifikasyon durumuna göre üç gruba ayrılmıştır. Çalışmaya toplam 260 hasta (80 normal sella tursika, 102 parsiyel ve 78 tam köprü) dahil edilmiştir. Maksiller sefalometrik ölçümler yapılmıştır. Sonuçlar p

🔖

Cite This Article

KARAMAN, A., SADRY, S. (2022). RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELLA TURCICA BRIDGING AND MAXILLARY IMPACTED CANINES AND MAXILLARY PARAMETERS. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 4, 515–521. https://ajindex.com/articles/451411

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Jones RM, Faqir A, Millett DT, Moos KF, McHugh S. Bridging and dimensions of Sella turcica in subjects treated by surgical-orthodontic means or orthodontics only. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:714–8
  2. Perez IE, Chavez KA, Ponce D. Frequency of sella turcica bridge and clinoid enlargement in lateral cephalometric plain film radiography from Peruvians. Int J Morphol. 2013;31:373–7
  3. Melsen B. The cranial base: the postnatal development of the cranial base studied histologically on human autopsy material. Acta Odontol Scand. 1974;32:9–126
  4. Sobuti F, Dadgar S, Seifi A, Musavi SJ, Hadian H. Relationship between bridging and dimensions of sella turcica with classification of craniofacial skeleton. Pol J Radiol. 2018;83:e120–6
  5. Divya S, Urala AS, Prasad GL, Pentapati KC. Sella turcica bridging a diagnostic marker for impacted canines and supernumerary teeth. J Int Oral Health 2018;10:94-8
  6. Scribante A, Sfondrini MF, Cassani M, Fraticelli D, Beccari S, Gandini P. Sella turcica bridging and dental anomalies: is there an association? Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017;27:568–73
  7. Yavuz M S, Aras M H, Büyükkurt M C, Tozoglu S. Impacted Mandibular Canines J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:78-85
  8. Manne R, Gandikota C, Juvvadi SR, Rama HR, Anche S. Impacted canines: Etiology, diagnosis, and orthodontic management. J Pharm Bioallied Sci 2012;4:S234–8
  9. Lindauer SJ, Rubenstein LK, Hang WM, Andersen WC, Isaacson RJ. Canine impaction identified early with panoramic radiographs. J Am Dent Assoc 1992; 123:91 10. Leonardi R, Barbato E, Vichi M, Caltabiano M. A sella turcica bridge in subjects with dental anomalies. Eur J Orthod 2006; 28:580–5
  10. Ponglertnapakorn A., Burak, MY., and Barrios, JC. Anteroposterior and vertical maxillary changes with facial mask use in patients with unilateral cleft lip palate sequelae from General Hospital «Dr. Manuel Gea González 2014;2:170-178
  11. Athanasiou AE. Orthodontic Cephalometry. London: Mosby-Wolfe publication; 1995. Anatomy, Radiographic anatomy and Cephalometric landmarks of craniofacial skeleton, soft tissue profile, dentition, pharynx and cervical vertebrae; pp. 21–62
  12. Chalipa J, Akhoundi MS, Shoshtarimoghaddam E, Nik TH, Imani M. Designing orthodontic craniofacial templates for 8-14 year-old Iranian girls based on cephalometric norms. J Dent (Tehran) 2013;10:64-73
  13. Kjaer I. Orthodontics and foetal pathology: a personal view on craniofacial patterning. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:140–7
  14. Cederberg R, Benson B, Nunn M, Englis