SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3

COMPLICATIONS ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT WITH THE HERBST APPLIANCE

HERBST APAREYİ İLE YAPILAN ORTODONTİK TEDAVİDE KARŞILAŞILAN KOMPLİKASYONLAR

Esra YÜKSEL COŞKUN
Elçin ESENLİK
Pages
471–480
Publication Date
2022-10-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However there is no evidence about its inducing root resorption and condylar resorption The aim of this review was to present the complications encountered during and after treatment with various designs of the Herbst appliance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Various orthopedic appliances are used for mandibular growth stimulation in patients with mandibular retrognathia.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Complications based on the design and application of the appliance such as band breakage, band loss, telescope breakage, splint loss, and splint breakage, screw loosening, piston deformation and acrylic fracture and soft tissue injuries can be encountered, whereas, excessive lower incisor protrusion and increased curve of spee can be seen at the end of treatment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However there is no evidence about its inducing root resorption and condylar resorption The aim of this review was to present the complications encountered during and after treatment with various designs of the Herbst appliance.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Various orthopedic appliances are used for mandibular growth stimulation in patients with mandibular retrognathia. Herbst appliance is one of the fixed functional orthopedic appliances used for this purpose and it can be used with different modifications. Different effects can be obtained depending on the patient's age and growth and development stages with this treatment. Complications based on the design and application of the appliance such as band breakage, band loss, telescope breakage, splint loss, and splint breakage, screw loosening, piston deformation and acrylic fracture and soft tissue injuries can be encountered, whereas, excessive lower incisor protrusion and increased curve of spee can be seen at the end of treatment. However there is no evidence about its inducing root resorption and condylar resorption The aim of this review was to present the complications encountered during and after treatment with various designs of the Herbst appliance.

Özet

Mandibular retrognatinin mevcut olduğu hastalarda, mandibular büyüme stimülasyonu için çeşitli ortopedik apareylerdenfaydalanılmaktadır. Herbst apareyi, bu amaçla kullanılan sabit fonksiyonel ortopedik apareylerden biridir ve farklı tasarımlarlakullanılabilmektedir. Bu tedavi yöntemi ile hastanın yaşına ve büyüme-gelişim dönemine göre farklı etkiler elde edilebilmektedir.Apareylerin tasarım ve uygulanmasına bağlı olarak tedavi süresince; bant kırılması, bandın kaybolması, teleskop parçasınınkırılması, splint kaybı ve splint kırılması, vida gevşemesi, piston deformasyonu ve akrilik parçanın kırılması ve yumuşak dokuyaralanmaları gibi komplikasyonlarla karşılaşılırken; tedavi sonunda ise aşırı alt kesici diş protrüzyonu ve spee eğrisinin artmasıgibi durumlarla da karşılaşılabilmektedir. Kök rezorpsiyonu ve kondiler rezorpsiyona yol açtığı konusunda ise bilimsel bir kanıthenüz bulunmamaktadır. Bu derlemenin amacı Herbst apareyinin çeşitli tasarımlarıyla yapılan tedavi sırasında ve sonrasındakarşılaşılan komplikasyonları sunmaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, E. Y., ESENLİK, E. (2022). COMPLICATIONS ENCOUNTERED IN ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT WITH THE HERBST APPLIANCE. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 3, 471–480. https://ajindex.com/articles/451304

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Pancherz H. History, Background and Development of the Herbst Appliance. Semin Orthod 2003;9:3- 11
  2. Pancherz H. The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment. A cephalometric investigation. Am J Orthod 1982;82:104-13
  3. Dagsuyu I.M., Baydas B. Sınıf II Bölüm 1 malokluzyonlu bireylerde fonksiyonel ortopedik tedavi etkilerinin aksiyografik ve sefalometrik yontemlerle incelenmesi. Atatürk Üniv Diş Hek Fak Derg 2011; 3: 196-212
  4. Zhang C. Herbst appliance anchored with miniscrews: Some unsettled questions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 2020;157:285-6
  5. Pancherz H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1979;76: 423-42
  6. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance-Its biologic effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1- 20
  7. Pancherz H, Hagg U. Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. Am J Orthod 1985;88:273-87
  8. Pancherz H, Hansen K. Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment. Eur J Orthod 1986;8:215- 28
  9. Wieslander L. Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentition. Am J Orthod 1984;86:1- 13
  10. Wong GW, So LL, Hägg U. A comparative study of sagittal correction with the Herbst appliance in two different ethnic groups. Eur J Orthod 1997;19:195- 204
  11. McNamara JA, Howe RP. Clinical management of the acrylic splint Herbst appliance. Am J Orthod 1988;94:142-9
  12. Konik M, Pancherz H, Hansen K. The mechanism of Class II correction in late Herbst treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;112:87-91
  13. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;115:607-18
  14. Ruf S, Pancherz H. Dentoskeletal effects and facial profile changes in young adults treated with the Herbst appliance. Angle Orthod 1999;69:239-46
  15. Martina S, Di Stefano ML, Paduano FP, Aiello D, Valletta R, Paduano S. Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance. Dent J (Basel) 2020; 8: 27
  16. Moresca AHK, de Moraes ND, Topolski F, FloresMir C, Moro A, Moresca RC, et al. Esthetic perception of facial profile changes in Class II patients treated with Herbst or Forsus appliances. Angle Orthod 2020;90:571-7
  17. Moro A, Janson G,