Journals / Acta Medica Alanya / 2019 / Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2

The Effects of The Artificial Tears Preparations on Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Individuals

Normal Bireylerde Suni Gözyaşı Preparatlarının Kontrast Duyarlılık Değerleri Üzerine Etkileri

Pages
116–123
Publication Date
2019-08-23
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: In the case of healthy individuals with tears film stability problems with the use of low viscosity artificial tears preparation in the form of drops, It could not be shown to decrease retinal image quality by applying CS test within retention times, even increased in some spatial frequencies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Determination of the change in contrast sensitivity (CS) values according to time after the use of artificial tears preparations with a different retention time (RT) and different viscosity in healthy individuals.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: From 120 healthy individuals, after a detailed ophthalmologic examination, fifteen were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: In the case of healthy individuals with tears film stability problems with the use of low viscosity artificial tears preparation in the form of drops, It could not be shown to decrease retinal image quality by applying CS test within retention times, even increased in some spatial frequencies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Suni gözyaşı preparatı · Kontrast duyarlılık · Kalıcılık süresi

Abstract

Aim: Determination of the change in contrast sensitivity (CS) values according to time after the use of artificial tears preparations with a different retention time (RT) and different viscosity in healthy individuals. Methods: From 120 healthy individuals, after a detailed ophthalmologic examination, fifteen were included in the study. Low viscosity Hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC)+Dextran 70 (Drug A), low viscosity Polyvinyl prolidone (Drug B) and high viscosity Polyacrylic acid gel (Drug C) artificial tears preparations were used. First Drug A was used, followed one week later by Drug B, and lastly by Drug C. One eye of the individuals were selected randomly and one drop was added after 1-5, 15, 30, 60, 90 minutes; CS values were measured with Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT). Results: With Drug A, at 6 cycles per degree (cpd) spatial frequency, the values of CS at 30th,60th,90th min. significantly increased compared to the values at base (0 min) and 1st-5th min. (p<0,05). With Drug B, at 12 cpd frequency, the values at 30th min. significantly increased, compared to the values at 1st-5th min. (p<0.05). With medication C, at 3 cpd frequency, the values at 1st-5th min. significantly decreased, compared to the values at base (0th min.), 15th, 30th ,60th ,90th min. (p<0,05). With C, at 6 cpd frequency, the values at 1st-5th min. significantly decreased compared to the values at base (0th minute), 30th, 60th ,90th min. (p<0,01). Also at 15th min., we noted a significant decrease in the values compared to values at 30th, 90th min. (p<0,05). Again with C at 12 cpd frequency, the values at 1st-5th min. significantly decreased compared to values at base (0th min), 60th, 90th min. (p<0,05). Conclusion: In the case of healthy individuals with tears film stability problems with the use of low viscosity artificial tears preparation in the form of drops, It could not be shown to decrease retinal image quality by applying CS test within retention times, even increased in some spatial frequencies.

Özet

Amaç: Normal bireylerde farklı kalıcılık süreli (KS) ve farklı viskoziteli suni gözyaşı preparatlarının kullanımı sonrası zamana göre kontrast duyarlılık (KD) değerlerindeki değişikliğin tespit edilmesi. Yöntemler: 120 sağlıklı bireyden detaylı oftalmolojik muayene sonrası 15’i çalışmaya dâhil edildi. Düşük viskoziteli Hidroksipropil metilsellüloz (HPMC)+Dekstran 70 (İlaç A), düşük viskoziteli Polivinil prolidon (İlaç B) ve yüksek viskoziteli Poliakrilik asit jel (İlaç C) suni gözyaşı preparatları kullanıldı. İlk İlaç A, bir hafta sonra B ve en son C kullanıldı. Bireylerin rastgele bir gözü seçilip 1 damla dam-latıldıktan sonraki 1-5, 15, 30, 60, 90. dk’da KD değerleri Functional Acuity Contrast Test (FACT) ile ölçüldü. Bulgular: A ilacıyla, zaman içindeki KD değerlerinin karşılaştırılmasında, 6 cpd uzaysal frekansta bazal ve 1-5. dk’ya göre 30, 60, 90. dk’da ölçülen değerlerde anlamlı artış görüldü (p<0,05). B ilacıyla 12 cpd frekansta, 1-5. dk’ya göre 30. dk’da anlamlı artış bulundu (p<0,05). C ilacıyla 3 cpd frekansta bazal, 15, 30, 60, 90. dk’lara göre 1-5. dk’da (p<0,05), ile 6 cpd uzaysal frekansta bazal, 30, 60, 90. dk’lara göre 1-5. dk’da (p<0,001) ve 30, 90. dk’lara göre 15. dk’da (p<0,05) anlamlı azalma görüldü. Sonuç: Damla formundaki düşük viskoziteli suni gözyaşı preparatı kullanımı ile gözyaşı film stabilite problemi olmayan normal bireylerde, KD testi uygulanarak KS içinde retinal görüntü kalitesinde azalma yaptığı gösterilemedi, hatta bazı uzaysal frekanslarda arttığı görüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜK, M. F. (2019). The Effects of The Artificial Tears Preparations on Contrast Sensitivity in Healthy Individuals. Acta Medica Alanya, Cilt: 3 - Sayı: 2, 116–123. https://ajindex.com/articles/449823

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Rieger G. The importance of the precorneal tear film for the quality of optical imaging. Br J Ophthalmol 1992
  2. PMID: 1540559 2. Tutt R, Bradley A, Begley C, Thibos LN. Optical and visual impact of tear break-up in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000
  3. PMID: 11095604 3. Rieger G. Contrast sensitivity in patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca before and after artificial tear application. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1993
  4. PMID: 8224932 4. Huang F, Tseng S, Shih M, Chen F. Effect of artificial tears on corneal surface regularity, contrast sensitivity, and glare disability in dry eyes. Ophthalmology 2002
  5. PMID: 12359618 5. Rolando M, Iester M, Macrı A, Calabria G. Low spatial-contrast sensitivity in dry eyes. Cornea 1998
  6. 17(4): 376-379. PMID: 9676908 6. Kamış Ü, Okka M, Küçükçelik H. Kontrast duarlılık ve renk görme. T Oft. Gaz. 2001
  7. 737 7. Altuğ M, Gözüm N, Gücükoğlu A. Steroid kataraktının kontrast duyarlılık ve kamaşma üzerine olan etkileri. T. Oft. Gaz. 1999
  8. Zhu H, Chaunan A. A mathematical model for tear drainage through the canaliculi. Curr. Eye Res. 2005
  9. PMID: 16109641 9. King-Smith PE, Fink BA, Hill RM, Koelling KW, Tiffany JM. The tickness of tear film. Curr. Eye Res. 2004
  10. PMID: 15590483 10. Nichols JJ, Mitchell GL, King-Smith PE, Thinking rate of the precorneal and prelens tear films. Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2005
  11. PMID: 15980222 11. Braun RJ, King-Smith PE, Begley CG, Li L, Gewecke NR. Dynamics and function of the tear film in relation to the blink cycle. Progress in Retinal and Eye Research, 2015
  12. 132–164. PMID: 25479602 12. Cerretani CF, Radke CJ. Tear dynamics in healthy and dry eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2014 Jun
  13. 39(6): 580-95. PMID: 24502301 13. Simmons PA, Vehige JG. Clinical performance of a midviscosity artificial tear for dry eye treatment. Cornae 2007
  14. PMID: 17413956 14. Oğurel T, Oğurel R, Özer MA, Onaran Z. Evaluatıon Of Ocular Surface Disease In Glaucoma Patients Using Topıcal Antiglaucomatous Agents. Acta Med. Alanya 2017
  15. 1(3): 9-14. Doi: 10.30565/medalanya.342369 15. Pavlopoulos G P, Horn J, FeldmanS T. The effect of artificial tears on computer-assisted corneal topography in normal eyes end after penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1995
  16. PMID: 7785684 16. Palakuru JR, Wrong J, Aquavella JV. Effect of blinking on Tear Dynamics. Invest Ophthalmol Vis. Sci. 2007