SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2010 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 135

Tripartite plan its usage in domestic and public architecture ( 5800-3100 BC )

Tripartite plan evsel ve kamusal mimaride kullanımı (M.Ö. 5800-3100)

Alev ERARSLAN
Pages
11–22
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This article is an attempt to analyze the roots and evolutionary stages of this plan scheme.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Tripartite plan is a very prevalent plan type used both in domestic and in public architecture in Mesopotamia throughout V-IV. millennium BC.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This layout, that is used firstly in the Ubaid Period, is certainly pre-planned and has extended families.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This article is an attempt to analyze the roots and evolutionary stages of this plan scheme.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Tripartite plan is a very prevalent plan type used both in domestic and in public architecture in Mesopotamia throughout V-IV. millennium BC. This layout, that is used firstly in the Ubaid Period, is certainly pre-planned and has extended families. In its simplest form, it consists of a long rectangular main room (salon) and several other rooms arranged both longer side of this salon. Tripartite plan appears to have developed and gone through a process of spatial evolution the periods of Ubaid and Uruk, which are the cultural periods survived throughout V-IV. millennium BC in Mesopotamia. Thus, it constitutes several sub-types. Although displaying some differences in the development process, it reveals a decidedly common tradition in terms of general concept. This plan is also proto-type of the central courtyard plan. This article is an attempt to analyze the roots and evolutionary stages of this plan scheme.

Özet

Türkçe'ye "Üç Bölümlü Plan" olarak çevrilen tripartite plan Mezopotamya mimarisinde M.Ö. V-IV. bin yıllar boyunca evsel ve kamusal mimarlıkta yaygın olarak kullanılmış bir plan tipidir. Adını Güney Mezopotamya Bölgesi'ndeki Tell-al Ubaid yerleşmesinden alan Ubaid Kültürü (M.Ö. 5800-4200) ile birlikte görülmeye başlayan bu plan en basit şekliyle, dikey dikdörtgen şeklindeki bir merkezi odanın (avlu ) 2 uzun kenarı boyunca uzanan çeşitli yön ve ebatlardaki bir sıra oda dizisinden oluşur. Bu plan M.Ö.V-IV. bin yıllar boyunca konut mimarisi ve kamusal mimaride genel kuruluş ilkeleri aynı kalmakla birlikte, merkezî odanın (avlu) şekli ve bu oda etrafındaki oda dizileri ile düzenlemeleri açısından farklı uygulamalar gerçekleştirilerek, çeşitli alt tipler oluşturarak ve mekansal evrim geçirerek kullanılmaya devam eder.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERARSLAN, A. (2022). Tripartite plan its usage in domestic and public architecture ( 5800-3100 BC ). Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 135, 11–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/448825

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. ADAMS, R. Mc C. 1981, Heartland of Cities: Surveys of Ancient Settlement and Land Use on the Central Floodplain of the Euphrates, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  2. ADAMS, R. Mc C. 1960, "Factors Influencing the Rise of Civilization in the Alluvium: Illustrated by Mesopotamia", City Invincible. A Symposium on Urbanization and Cultural Development in the Near East, (eds). C. H. Kraeling - R. Mcc. Adams, Chicago, University of Chicago, ss. 24-46.
  3. AKKERMANS, P. M. M. G. 1989, "Tradition and Social Change in Northern Mesopotamia during Later Fifth and Fourth Millennium B.C.", Upon This Foundation: The Ubaid Reconsidered, (eds). E. F. Henrickson, I. Thuesen - Copenhagen, CNI Publications, ss. 339-69.
  4. ALGAZE, G. 1993, The Uruk World System: The Dynamics of Expansion of Early Mesopo-tamian Civilisation, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  5. ALGAZE, G. 2005, "The Sumerian Takeoff', Structure and Dynamics: efournal of Anthropological and Related Sciences, vol: 1, Issue:, ss. 1-41.
  6. AURENCHE, O. 1980, "Mesopotamian Architecture from the 7th to the 4th Millennium", Sumer XLII, ss. 71-80.
  7. BRENIQUET, C. 1989, "Les Origines de la Culture d'Obeid en Mesopotamie du Nord", Upon this Foundation. The Ubaid Reconsidered, (eds). E. F. Henrickson - I. Thuesen, Copenhagen, CNI Publications, ss. 325-338.
  8. DRIEL, G. V. 2002, "Jebel Aruda: Variations on a Late Uruk Domestic Theme", Artefacts of Complexity: Tracking the Uruk in the Near East, (ed). J. N. Postgate, Archaeological Reports vol. 5. Warminster: Aris & Philips, ss. 191-209.
  9. DRIEL, G. V. - D.C.V. MURRAY. 1979, "Jebel Aruda 1977-78", Akkadica 12, ss. 2-29.
  10. DRIEL, G. V. - D.C.V. MURRAY. 1983, "Jebel Aruda, The 1982 Seasons of Excavations Interim Report", Akkadica 33, ss. 1-27.
  11. ERARSLAN, A. 1996, Mezopotamya Bölgesi'nde Tarihi Çağlarda Görülen Konut Mimarisi Tipolojisi, Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi.
  12. ERARSLAN, A. 2008, "The Ubaid Period in the Urbanisation Process; The Birth of Urbanism in the Near East (5500-3800 BC)", Belleten, Sayı 264, ss. 395-412.
  13. ESİN, U. 1998, "Die Tempel von Değirmentepe wahrend der Chalkolithischen Obedperiode", Rencontre Assyriologique Internationale XXXIV, ss. 659-677.
  14. FOREST, J. D. 1987, "La Grande Architecture Obeidienne: Sa Forme et sa Fonction", Prehis-toire de la Mesopotamie, (eds). J. L. Huot, Paris, CNRS Publications, ss. 385-425.
  15. FOREST, J. D. 1996, "Queili et les origines de l'architecture obeidienne", Queili, Travaux de 1987 et 1989, (ed). J. D. Huot, Par