SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2012 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 141

BYZANTINE MONASTERIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEOLOGY, LITURGY AND ICONOGRAPHY

Teoloji, Liturji ve İkonografi İlişkisi Ba¤laminda Bizans Manastirlari

Ferda BARUT
Pages
111–120
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Byzantine monasteries, as being the centers which shape the theology and the liturgy and as being the production centers and/or donors of the religious buildings and objects, affected the typology and the iconography of the Byzantine art.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The political and the social existence of the Byzantine Empire was substantially related with Orthodox theology and liturgy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The iconography of the Byzantine religious objects and the decoration of the churches were connected with Orthodox theology and liturgy.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Byzantine monasteries, as being the centers which shape the theology and the liturgy and as being the production centers and/or donors of the religious buildings and objects, affected the typology and the iconography of the Byzantine art.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The political and the social existence of the Byzantine Empire was substantially related with Orthodox theology and liturgy. The iconography of the Byzantine religious objects and the decoration of the churches were connected with Orthodox theology and liturgy. Byzantine monasteries, as being the centers which shape the theology and the liturgy and as being the production centers and/or donors of the religious buildings and objects, affected the typology and the iconography of the Byzantine art.

Özet

Siyasi ve toplumsal varlığını dine özgüleyen Bizans İmparatorluğunun temelini oluşturan Ortodoks teolojisi ve teolojiyle bağlantılı ayinler bütünü olarak liturji, Bizans dini sanatı örneklerinin ikonografisiyle ilişkilidir. Bizans manastırları ise teolojinin ve teolojiyle etkileşim içindeki dini liturjinin biçimlendiği merkezler olmalarının yanı sıra, kullanıcısı oldukları dini yapıların ve dini işlevli objelerin kimi zaman üretim merkezleri kimi zaman da banileri olarak tipolojilerini ve ikonografilerini etkilemişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BARUT, F. (2022). BYZANTINE MONASTERIES IN THE CONTEXT OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEOLOGY, LITURGY AND ICONOGRAPHY. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 141, 111–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/448776

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Acara, M. 1998, “Bizans Ortodoks Kilisesinde Liturji ve Liturjik Eserler”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:15, Sayı:1, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları,
  2. Ankara.
  3. Akyürek, E. 1996, Bizans’ta Sanat ve Ritüel: Kariye Güney fiapelinin İkonografisi ve İşlevi, Kabalcı Yayınları,
  4. İstanbul.
  5. Baldwin, B. 1991, “Cappadocian Fathers”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Cilt:1, Oxford University Press,
  6. Oxford-New York. Belting, H. 1994, Likeness and Presence: A History of the Image before the Era of Art, University of Chicago Press,
  7. Chicago. Boyd, S. – M. Mango (yay.), 1993, Ecclesiastical Silver Plate in Sixth-Century Byzantium, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington. Cameron, A. 1991, “Acheiropoieta”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Cilt:1, Oxford University Press,
  8. Oxford-New York. Cormack, R. 1983, “Byzantine Art”, The Encyclopedia of Visual Art, Cilt: 3, Encyclopaedia Britannica International. Doğan, S. 2003, “Ortaçağ Manastır Sistemi: Doğu ve Batı Manastırları”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt 20, Sayı 2, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Yayınları,
  9. Ankara.
  10. Epstein, A. W. 1981, “Formulas for Salvation: A Comparison of Two Byzantine Monasteries and Their Founders”, Church History, Vol. 50, No. 4, Cambridge University Press,
  11. Cambridge. Haldon, J. 2006, Bizans Tarih Atlası, (çev. A. Özdamar), Kitap Yayınevi,
  12. İstanbul.
  13. Haussig, H. W. 1971,
  14. A History of Byzantine Civilization, E. J. Brill, Leiden. Hetherington, P. (yay.), 1996, The ‘Painter’s Manual’ of Dionysius of Fourna, Oakwood Publications, California. İpşiroğlu, N. – M. İpşiroğlu, 1977,
  15. Oluşum Sürecinde Sanatın Tarihi, Cem Yayınevi, İstanbul. Jolivet-Lévy, C. 1991, Les Eglises Byzantines de Cappadoce: Le Programme Iconographique de l’abside et de ses Abords, Presses du CNRS, Paris. Kartsonis, A. 2002, “The Responding Icon”, Heaven on Earth: Art and the Church in Byzantium, L. Safran (yay.), The Pennsylvania University Press,
  16. Pennsylvania. Kazdhan, A. 1991, “Maximos the Confessor”, The Oxford Dictionary of Byzantium, Cilt:2, Oxford University Press,
  17. Oxford-New York. Kazdhan, A. – H. Maguire, 1991, “Byzantine Hagiographical Texts as Sources on Art”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Vol. 45, Dumbarton Oaks, Washington. Louth, A. 2008, “Byzantine Theology”, The Oxford Handbook of Byzantine Studies, E. Jeffrey, J. Haldon – R. Cormack (yay.), Oxford University Press,
  18. Oxford-New York. Manafis, K. A. (yay.), 1990, Sinai: Treasures of the Monastery of Saint Catheri