Journals / Arkeoloji ve Sanat / 2014 / Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 146

HACILAR I TEKRAR DEĞERLENDİRME

Revisiting Hacılar

Pages
13–28
Publication Date
2022-10-11
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Part of the Hacılar collection held in Burdur, including a large number of as yet unpublished artefacts, is presented here.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Over half a century ago, James Mellaart, the then assistant director of the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, conducted excavation at Hacılar, in the Southwest Anatolian Lake District.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This article examines the situation of the site, by recounting a visit to the archaeological ruins and to the regional Museum of Burdur in 2010.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Part of the Hacılar collection held in Burdur, including a large number of as yet unpublished artefacts, is presented here.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Over half a century ago, James Mellaart, the then assistant director of the British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, conducted excavation at Hacılar, in the Southwest Anatolian Lake District. Alongside Çatalhöyük, Hacılar played a pivotal role in the development of Neolithic archaeology in Turkey. Yet, despite its significance for the discipline, Hacılar has not received the level of international attention that Çatalhöyük has, at least in recent literature. This article examines the situation of the site, by recounting a visit to the archaeological ruins and to the regional Museum of Burdur in 2010. Part of the Hacılar collection held in Burdur, including a large number of as yet unpublished artefacts, is presented here.

Özet

Yarım asır önce zamanın Ankara İngiliz Arkeoloji Enstitüsü müdür muavini James Mellaart, Anadolu Göller Yöresinin güneybatı tarafında yer alan Hacılarda bir kazı gerçekleştirmişti. Çatalhöyükle birlikte Türkiyedeki Neolitik arkeolojinin gelişmesinde mihver olan Hacılar, alandaki değerine karşın, uluslararası camiada Çatalhöyükün kazandığı ilgiyien azından son zamanların makalelerine kadarpek çekmedi. Bu makale arkeolojik harabelere ve Burdur Belediye Müzesine yapılan ziyaretlerin (2010) anlatılması suretiyle kazı alanının durumunu incelemektedir. Burdur Hacılar koleksiyonunun bir kısmı, henüz yayınlanmamış hatırı sayılır sayıda eseri de içererek burada sunulacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BRAMİ, M. (2022). HACILAR I TEKRAR DEĞERLENDİRME. Arkeoloji ve Sanat, Cilt: 0 - Sayı: 146, 13–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/448706

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Demirkaya, H., Inel, Y. 2008: ‘The effects of the Yazıköy-epicentred Burdur earthquake (12 May 1971) on the residents of the village’ Journal of Beliefs and Values 29(3): 243-252.
  2. Duru, R. 1989: ‘Were the earliest cultures at Hacılar really aceramic ?’ in K. Emre, M. Mellink, B. Hronda, N. Özgüç (eds), Anatolia and the Ancient Near East (Studies in Honor of Tahsin Özgüç). Ankara: 99-105. – 1999: ‘The Neolithic of the Lake District’ in M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen (eds), Neolithic in Turkey. The Cradle of Civilization. New Discoveries (Ancient Civilization series 3). Istanbul: 165-191. – 2007: ‘Göller Bölgesi Neolitiği: Hacılar – Kuruçay Höyüğü – Höyücek – Bademağacı Höyüğü’ in M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen (eds), Anadolu’da Uygarlığın Doğuşu ve Avrupa’ya Yayılımı. Türkiye’de Neolitik Dönem. Yeni kazılar-yeni bulgular. Istanbul: 331-360. – 2008: From 8000 BC to 2000 BC. Six thousand years of the Burdur-Antalya Region (Monography Series 4). Antalya. – 2010: Elli yıllık bir arkeoloji öyküsü. Hacılar (Monografi Dizisi 6). Antalya. – 2012: The Neolithic of the Lakes Region. Hacılar – Kuruçay Höyük – Höyücek – Bademağacı Höyük in M. Özdoğan, N. Başgelen, P. Kuniholm (eds), The Neolithic in Turkey. New Excavations & New Research. Volume 4. Western Turkey, Istanbul: 1-65.
  3. Mellaart, J. 1958: ‘Excavations at Hacılar: First Preliminary Report’ Anatolian Studies 8:127- 156. – 1970: Excavations at Hacılar (British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Occasional Publications 10). Edinburgh. – 1978: The Archaeology of Ancient Turkey. London. Orton, C., Tyers, P., Vince, A., 1993: Pottery in archaeology. Cambridge. Özdoğan, M. 1999: ‘Northwestern Turkey: Neolithic Cultures in Between the Balkans and Anatolia’ in M. Özdoğan and N. Başgelen (eds), Neolithic in Turkey. The Cradle of Civilization. New Discoveries (Ancient Civilization series 3). Istanbul: 203-224.
  4. Schoop, U.D. 2005: ‘The Late Escape of the Neolithic from the Central Anatolian Plain’ in C. Lichter (ed), How did Farming reach Europe? Anatolian-European Relations from the second half of the 7th through the first half of the 6th Millennium cal BC. Proceedings of the International Workshop, Istanbul 20-22 may 2004 (Byzas 2). Istanbul: 41-58.
  5. Smoor, B. (1976): ‘Bone Tools’ in M. Gimbutas (ed.), Neolithic Macedonia. As reflected by Excavation at Anza, Southeast Yougoslavia. (Monumenta Archaeologica, volume 1) Los Angeles: 189-197.
  6. Vermoere, M. 2004: Holocene Vegetation History in the Territory of Sagalassos (Southwest Turkey).